RIAA moves to the dark side


Recommended Posts

if they make and release malware, then they can be and should sued like everyone else, they are no protection for no one regarding this type of practice and it is illigal even for the goverment themself for making odes if they do. And are subject to the same type of treatment that we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is illegal P2P software? Do they mean P2P file sharing programs, or music downloaded via P2P programs?

I'm pretty sure there is no such thing as illegal P2P software. Can't wait to see the counter-suit when the RIAA software screws up an important computer somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely despise the RIAA but did anyone read this article? First of all it was IFPI that released this software, and it is not malware, its software that you can install on your system to remove any file sharing software etc. There is no mention of it being installed maliciously or anything. It's total propaganda but its not malware, as I can see how a parent might use this on their kid's computer if they weren't tech savvy and were afraid of getting sued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see this, personally, as fighting an illegal action with another illegal action. Infecting computers with the equivalent of a virus to search for such things *should be* completely illegal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not being released as Malware and even if it was the same people who made p2p possible and cracked all the attempts to keep cd's from being ripped will take this, eat it up and spit it right back out and have a big laugh.

The RIAA needs to wake up and realize there's nothing they can do to stop this. They can try all they want. Even if they find a way to stop cd's from being played on PC's, you can always just plug a line into the Line In jack on the sound card and record it.

The RIAA is WASTING more money than it's losing in P2P file sharing

The artists barely make any money of the sell of a CD anyway. The artist makes there money doing concerts. They barely see a dime from CD sales. You can sell a couple million cd's and only get like 50,000 to 100,000 when the record company gets millions. This is why a lot of artists don't really give a damn about file sharing. It helps them more than anything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no, youre wrong, the RIAA could stop this: lower the prices.

586564139[/snapback]

Why pay when you can get it absolutly free? Some people have feelings for the billion-dollar executives, so they'll pay for it. There is too many people that would just simply not buy CD's, ever again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmfao @ The RIAA , They Have Issues ... No way They Will get to me tho...What idioits They are. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Illegal file sharing does not negatively affect record sales in my opinion. It may even have a positive impact.

There is crippleware (as most of us here are aware) that is included with many audio CDs these days. I think that keeping users from making back up copies of their music is mostly just a major pain to the average honest buyer. I bought a cd recently and I couldn't rip it to my computer to be able to play it on my MP3 player. This is unfair, I paid for the music, I should be able to listen to it any way I want to. I will think twice before I buy from that label again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ROFL bring it on I say I can imagine all the spyware that is shipped in the P2P software will make some anti RIAA stuff lol. Wont something like this be classed as illegal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.