Philadelphia's citywide WiFi close to shutting down


Recommended Posts

Philadelphia's citywide WiFi close to shutting down

It'd be absolutely spectacular to actually see one of these admittedly ambitious municipal WiFi projects actually work out every now and then, but instead, we're seeing the nails start to sink into yet another citywide WiFi coffin.

This go 'round, the network blanketing most of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is on the verge of sending out its last signals unless the city can devise a plan in short order to take it over from EarthLink, who unsurprisingly wants out on the double. Unfortunately, we don't have a great feeling about the system's future -- history has a way of forecasting, you know?

Source: Engadget

Edited by peachey

Of course it is on the verge of shutting down... The city implemented this in the wrong fashion!

When the plan was first announced the city said it would cost around $10 million to roll out city based WiFi and everything was going well. Then they changed their tune out of no where and said Earthlink was doing it for free. I knew then that the system wouldn't last as they had given it a doomed for failure business model.

The primary focus and measure for Muni WiFi shouldn't be in how many residential or private sector customers it can land, but in how it can help city government run more efficiently. It could have been used to give city workers fast access to data for a lot less cost than Cell access. It could have been used to enable Septa to accept credit cards on buses and provide real time bus tracking to customers. The list of government improvements are endless. The side benefit could have been giving disadvantaged people or the public free access to the Internet.

It is a shame city hall screwed this one up by trying to penny pinch far too hard.

Seriously, why does everyone think Google is some kinda Saviour or something? Someday they will show their true colors... and it's most likely not red, blue, green and yellow...

uhh... Because didn't they build the network for San Francisco? Or was it Sunnyville? meh, it was one of those. Either way, If they did, I wouldn't be surprised by the news.

I live in Philadelphia and I gotta admit I have not used the Metro-Fi access at all. I'm more than paranoid about my computer's information but at the same time I do not own a laptop. I hope that as a previous user suggested, that Septa along with another company turns this City Wi-Fi into something useful.

I live in Philadelphia and I gotta admit I have not used the Metro-Fi access at all. I'm more than paranoid about my computer's information but at the same time I do not own a laptop. I hope that as a previous user suggested, that Septa along with another company turns this City Wi-Fi into something useful.

I do consulting for the Philadelphia area, I havn't run into anyone who uses or wants to use the city wide wireless. Most people have Blackberries or Windows Mobile smart phones, and others use a cellular card for their laptops.

As for the comment about Septa... yeah that would be great, they can have another reason to hike their fairs and every 2 years or so threaten to put the wireless on strike and hold the customers hostage... I hate Septa, bunch of money grub'in $&%^#s.

You wanted one to work. Well ours works, I work in Port Huron, MI. and I work to maintain the wireless also. It covers all of our downtown. And it has been there for a few years now. So, I'm not sure how long you want it to last to say "it worked out" but here is an example.

I'm not going to say how many people actually use it tho. Because I don't really know anyone who actually uses it. I don't even use it. But I don't live there and when I work we have our own network that I have to connect to to get access to our servers.

Free Wi-Fi is incredibly slow, though, at least at all the hotspots that I've used. Usually paying a small fee will get you decent speeds.

I was once a fan of citywide Wi-Fi, but then I realized in this day and edge, between cell phone towers and 3G cell service, there's little need for slow public Wi-Fi.

Free Wi-Fi is incredibly slow, though, at least at all the hotspots that I've used. Usually paying a small fee will get you decent speeds.

I was once a fan of citywide Wi-Fi, but then I realized in this day and edge, between cell phone towers and 3G cell service, there's little need for slow public Wi-Fi.

There is a great need and use for it, but making it primarily for consumers isn't a good idea or useful.

Philadelphia citywide WiFi officially shut down

We knew it was coming, but Philadelphia's citywide WiFi is now officially being turned off, and Earthlink is planning on pulling down all of its access points.

Like basically every other municipal WiFi project, it seems like the cost of keeping the system going outweighed the benefits, and Earthlink couldn't find a buyer willing to take things over.

Current Earthlink customers will get 30 more days of service, until June 12, and then it's lights bytes out. Here's hoping Philly coffee shops are ready for an influx of urban warriors.

Source: Engadget (VIA: Philebrity)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!