What Windows 7 SP1 or Internet Explorer 9 should have?


Recommended Posts

First, IE 9 should be called IE 2010 instead, sounds cooler what you all think?

1) Alright, I have always wanted a "Breaking News" Alert system on Windows, or IE. Whenever there is a Breaking News, I get an Alarm on my computer waking me up! Maybe there is already a 3rd party software that can do this?

Or Any news, that you are very very interested in, even personal events!

2) Smarter system, period. I am not impressed Windows 7 still can NOT do this. :|

Whatever is slowing down the computer, making the computer slow there should be a 'Doctor' in Taskbar notification area WHAT is causing it - File name or process name. And see what solutions are available.

If it's because computer needs to be defragmented. It should tell you that. Or if IE has a bug, tell you that...

First, IE 9 should be called IE 2010 instead, sounds cooler what you all think?

1) Alright, I have always wanted a "Breaking News" Alert system on Windows, or IE. Whenever there is a Breaking News, I get an Alarm on my computer waking me up! Maybe there is already a 3rd party software that can do this?

2) Smarter system, period. I am not impressed Windows 7 still can NOT do this. :|

Whatever is slowing down the computer, making the computer slow there should be a 'Doctor' in Taskbar notification area WHAT is causing it - File name or process name. And see what solutions are available.

If it's because computer needs to be defragmented. It should tell you that. Or if IE has a bug, tell you that...

1. sounds cool, but could be annoying since there is breaking news every minute of the day

2. kinda lame but i know what you're insisting.

3. IE 2010? ick! IE 9.0 sounds fine

First, IE 9 should be called IE 2010 instead, sounds cooler what you all think?

Ick, god no. The only excuse for software to be named after a year is if it has a regular, yearly release. Even then, many pieces of software suffer from "year inflation" (eg. Autodesk products). It annoys me that it's 2009, and the latest stable MS Office suite is "MS Office 2007". Now, if a new version of IE is released every year, on schedule, then maybe. I still prefer version numbers.

1) Alright, I have always wanted a "Breaking News" Alert system on Windows, or IE. Whenever there is a Breaking News, I get an Alarm on my computer waking me up! Maybe there is already a 3rd party software that can do this?

Or Any news, that you are very very interested in, even personal events!

This is interesting. Though, "breaking" is subjective here. What kinds of things do you consider breaking? I'm sure that what you want is possible now, somehow through RSS feeds and third party programs/services. If you let us know specifically what you want, I'm sure you can get this working now.

2) Smarter system, period. I am not impressed Windows 7 still can NOT do this. :|

Whatever is slowing down the computer, making the computer slow there should be a 'Doctor' in Taskbar notification area WHAT is causing it - File name or process name. And see what solutions are available.

If it's because computer needs to be defragmented. It should tell you that. Or if IE has a bug, tell you that...

Well... Windows kind of already does this. It's called the task manager. It lists all of your processes, and their respective resource consumptions. It also gives you an opportunity to end tasks that are causing problems.

I mean, defrag problems? These are minor at most, and are automatically resolved by default through the built-in use of scheduled defrags. IE bugs? Once a bug is confirmed and fixed, Microsoft automatically pushes an update through Windows Update.

What additional functionality are you looking for?

----------

My requests:

Win7 SP1: It's just a service pack, so minor performance improvements, maybe? I'm not expecting much, and anything significant should be held for Windows 8+.

IE9: Better standards compliance? Better page loading times? More customization over the UI? A larger collection of add-ons to rival Firefox's? Any of these would do. That said, I don't really care because I rarely use IE.

Mine is simple. More options for auto arrange desktop icons. I've always wondered why auto arrange only arranges to the left. They should add an option to change which direction the icons are arranged (left, right, top or bottom of screen).

First, IE 9 should be called IE 2010 instead, sounds cooler what you all think?

1) Alright, I have always wanted a "Breaking News" Alert system on Windows, or IE. Whenever there is a Breaking News, I get an Alarm on my computer waking me up! Maybe there is already a 3rd party software that can do this?

Or Any news, that you are very very interested in, even personal events!

2) Smarter system, period. I am not impressed Windows 7 still can NOT do this. :|

Whatever is slowing down the computer, making the computer slow there should be a 'Doctor' in Taskbar notification area WHAT is causing it - File name or process name. And see what solutions are available.

If it's because computer needs to be defragmented. It should tell you that. Or if IE has a bug, tell you that...

1)FAIL.. There is nothing that ****es me off more than when movies/games/products go from numbering to quirky names to years and back. IE Windows 1,2,3,95,98, ME, XP, Vista, and back to numbering with 7

2) try task manager. it will tell you what is lockedup. how much memory programs are using and what %cpu

IE9? Dump the Trident engine and use Webkit. IE is the slowest mainstream browser and has the least innovative features. Let's not even talk about HTML5 (though it's still a draft, other browsers have at least started implementing a nice portion of it)... :( They should just dump the Trident engine in its entirety. It's not going to happen, even though it'd be the best thing for the consumer in the long run...

W7 is already great, any changes in SP1 will just be icing. :)

You do realise that a service pack will contain virtually no UI changes and certainly no major features (that you'd notice anyway) XP SP2 was the exception and it's unlike MS will ever do anything like that again.

you are absolutely correct. after the blaster and sasser virus' microsoft was forced to redouble it's efforts on security. What was released i would have actually called a free copy of Windows 2004. As necessary as it was it took too many resources from Longhorn. I still think the original vision for longhorn is far better than Vista or 7

As for an IE name change, I prefer version numbers myself. I think it's more accurate. I have IE 9.0.1.234, cool. I have IE 2010, O.K., but what version?

As for new stuff. I don't expect much, but it would definitely be cool. I would love an update to the desktop, but maybe we'll see that in Windows 8...

first of all SP1 would be a "service Pack" & not "feature pack",

IE9?? : No, i don't need any more IE, happy with FF & Chrome.

"Breaking News": yes a cool idea.

that doesnt mean that no one use it

Microsoft should abandon the Trident engine and adopt another one. Webkit would be nice, but I wouldn't complain if Microsoft went with Gecko either.

nah , why would they? just because everyone is doing that doesn't mean that they should

First: I think windows 7 should warn the user that there hardware is to old and that they should upgrage for better performance...This way it will stop the complainers from complaining about speed and file transfers issues. It's not always the hardware, it could actually be the OS or just the user causing the issues.

Second: I would like a feature that would make it easy to be able to move the icons in the task bar towards the center of the task bar.

third: IE just needs improvement in loading pages more fast and smoothly and render pages better

I like OPs idea of the taskbar doctor. Although we have something allready 'i.e. - (Action Center) - It could be improved to display an alert to what is slowing down the system, giving you one click access to the process that is running, and give you the option to kill it, along with not responding applications.

Other then that, for skinning - change the graphics for explorer.exe and put it back in the mssystles file for so we dont have to mess with replacing the explorer.exe file. Other then that, im more than happy with Windows 7, so anything that gets done on top of them two requests would be welcomed, specially performance wise :)

The only thing stopping my from using IE full time is ad-blocking that also collapses elements and an editable context menu. I hate having a bazillion context menu entries. At least in Windows I can regedit the ones I don't want out or hide them (SHIFT + RIGHT CLICK to view).

All I want from SP1 is the damned annoying bugs of explorer fixed. How some of those bugs ever got past Q&A, I'll never understand.

It should get download manager too.

It'd be in the EU courts before it was ever released.

IE9? Dump the Trident engine and use Webkit. IE is the slowest mainstream browser and has the least innovative features. Let's not even talk about HTML5 (though it's still a draft, other browsers have at least started implementing a nice portion of it)... :( They should just dump the Trident engine in its entirety. It's not going to happen, even though it'd be the best thing for the consumer in the long run...

...

HTML5 is going to be a draft for a long time, but that doesn't mean browser makers shouldn't be implementing features from it. The important thing to remember is that they all are implementing features from HTML5, even MS.

Although, MS would never drop Trident for WebKit (WebKit is controlled by Apple and Google).

But, they could do some work on the JS engine (brining it up to par with other browsers in speed and spec compliance), and adding some much needed features to the rendering engine (like the CSS3 modules that are done or near done)

I agree that IE9 should be based on WebKit, MS develops Trident too slowly to compete with other browser engines. It should get download manager too.

There is a webkit plugin for Internet Explorer which replaces trident with webkit when a certain HTML tag is present in the document. Hopefully Internet Explorer 8 is the beginning of some major changes given that Internet Explorer 8 was a major clean up which hopefully will lay the road for new features being added a lot quicker.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!