gamers

Graphics Patent Holder Sues Entire Gaming Industry

WishX   on 03 November 2004 - 22:14 · 26 comments & 3975 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A new lawsuit states that if you make a game with 3D action (like, say, Quake or Halo) and display it on a 2D monitor, you could be violating a patent.

The patent, number 4,734,690 is owned by one-time printing and graphics specialist Tektronix and covers the display of a 3D image in 2D. It was filed in April, 1987 and granted almost a year later.

US legal firm, Dallas, Texas-based McKool Smith, has been retained to file lawsuits against a large number of major game makers including Electronic Arts, Activision, Take Two, Ubisoft, Atari, THQ, Vivendi Universal, Sega, Square Enix, Tecmo, Lucasarts and Namco. Some smaller firms will also have lawsuits filed against them in the near future.

Theoretically, everything from CAD renderings to 3D vector-based web appliactions to Flash animation and more could fall under the patent infringement. If it's three-dimensional and displayed on a two-dimensional display, it's open ground for this lawsuit.

View: More Information


Please note, this is not the place to discuss whether or not you like the bands mentioned in this article. The article is about CD/DVD Hybrid discs making their way into the public market. Thank you.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 26 additional comments
#1 jerzdawg on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:20
anything to make a buck...
#2 yert* on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:20
...
(1 reply) #3 L3onheart on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:21
Ofcourse. Bush wins, Kerry loses, and stupidity is back in the good old US of A
#3.1 theh0g on 04 Nov 2004 - 07:47
Exactly, there is only one country with people retarded enough for something like this.
#4 Xtremz on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:22
Dang...
#5 moeburn on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:23
F*cking patents, they're to reward ingenuity, not to hoard money.
#6 RaWShadow on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:23
WTF
#7 altermind on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:25
I love how they wait for it to take off then try and enforce the patiant.... I think that should be illigel
#8 CTLA on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:26
There's always an angle!!!!!
(1 reply) #9 bangbang023 on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:26
Technically, wouldn't a film fall in to this. Afterall, our world is 3D and the screen is only 2D.

Some people
#9.1 WishX on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:35
No, it wouldn't.

According to the patent itself, "The present invention relates to graphics terminals and particularly to graphics terminals providing the user with the ability to alter the apparent viewing direction of a display derived from locally stored data."

It doesn't apply to projection and/or film.
#10 [X]-bYtE on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:32
Stupid! 15 years too late also
(1 reply) #11 tom5 on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:37
What a stupidity Another US patent. Can I also patent in the US the way I'm pissing?
#11.1 deiong15 on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:49
thats about how pathetic its come to. im sure soon enough someone will try then try to sue everyone for pissing in his patented way lol or sue people who make urinals if that hasnt been locked down yet. .

(1 reply) #12 steppas on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:37
Seeing as there were prior art at the time, i donīt understand why it was granted in the first place. But i am sure they will lose big time...
#12.1 WishX on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:43
That's exactly it. There was prior art and something like this will almost certainly get thrown out of court or, if won, overturned later.

There are too many huge corporate lawyers backing these game makers to ever have this successfully work out for the lawsuit filer.
(1 reply) #13 deiong15 on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:46
well then why arent they sueing microsoft for making direct x which is what is used to display teh games nto the actual game makers or the people who making opengl ?? since those are the actual two components that show games on the monitor not the game makers they just use direct x and opengl api to show it. but whats really displayign it is open gl an direct x. go fi gure. there idiots trying to make a buck and they cant even figure out who the real display makers are.
#13.1 CodeGuru on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:57
Exactly if they were to sue Microsoft this could almost make sense. The thing about this patent is that it describes the way that anyone with even limited knowledge in the realm of 3d rendering will figure out. As well it is based on math and derived from math equations which have been proven to be unpatentable before. I say this will fall through pretty quickly if they get a judge who has any logical sense.

It is possible they are trying to sue people like the publishers so that they can get enough money to try and sue Microsoft. It is either that or they are just trying to get some people to settle out of court in order to make some extra cash.
#14 DirtyLarry on 03 Nov 2004 - 22:56
Thats it, finally the motivation I needed to sue Sierra over Leisure Suit Larry.

My name is Larry, I have often thought what it would be like to wear a Leisure Suit, and although I do not look anything like a younger Larry from 3's Company TV Show like the character in the game does, I still think I have a damn good chance of winning the suit.
#15 Salluas on 03 Nov 2004 - 23:11
I KNEW I forgot to patent something in '87.. Oh well.. perhaps I should patent walking or somesuch.. Maybe a patent for procreation? Moronic suits indeed.. I'll sue the WORLD! People that sue over a 15 year old patent make me unhappy.
#16 paulhaskew on 03 Nov 2004 - 23:51
ok... patients just need to fooking die... this is annoying...
#17 tacheon on 04 Nov 2004 - 00:04
i think i would like to patent the registering of trademarking a copywrite
#18 Kushan on 04 Nov 2004 - 00:38
I'm gonna go patent displaying 2D graphics in a 3D environment, wait about 50 years then sue the Entire VR business.

EDIT: Oh and I'll Probably get sued by infiniumlabs after I do that, since it will infringe on something they've designed their super new, soon to be released at the time, console, the Phantom.
#19 jkinzer on 04 Nov 2004 - 02:18
OMG that's so pathetic. How can you get a patent for that?
#20 metro on 04 Nov 2004 - 03:28
Tektronix is pretty much right down the road from where I live. At least, their corporate headquarters. I can also vouch for saying that most of the people I have talked to that work there are complete dicks. This lawsuit is not suprising to me in the least bit...
#21 Soviet on 06 Nov 2004 - 16:35
I'm gunna patent the human breathing process than charge you all on your air usage.... i'll make trillions in a day!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)