Major record labels have been snooping onto the world's peer-to-peer song-sharing networks in a bid to measure which artists are proving popular among file-sharers. Media tracking company BigChampagne has been monitoring P2P services since 2000, and has sold the data it collates to some of the industry's biggest names, the company claims in an AP report. Disney, Dreamworks, and Warner Music Group subsidiaries Atlantic, Warner Bros. and Madonna's label, Maverick, are all BigChampagne clients. Company chief Eric Garland claims to have worked with all the major labels during the past three years.
Garland's organisation measures how frequently clients' artists are listed in searches conducted on the P2P networks, including Kazaa and Altnet. It also tracks how often clients' songs are downloaded. The company's actions have led to accusations that it is infringing P2P users' privacy - though how anyone illegally distributing copyright material can complain about that is hard to see. BigChampagne denies the allegation. It also states that it hasn't helped the Recording Industry Ass. of America (RIAA) identify file-sharers for the purpose of suing them.
That hasn't stopped Altnet threatening to take legal action of its own. It alleges that BigChampagne's snooping system violates its own intellectual property. The irony of the allegation can't have been lost on any of the parties concerned.
View: The full story
News source: The Reg
Garland's organisation measures how frequently clients' artists are listed in searches conducted on the P2P networks, including Kazaa and Altnet. It also tracks how often clients' songs are downloaded. The company's actions have led to accusations that it is infringing P2P users' privacy - though how anyone illegally distributing copyright material can complain about that is hard to see. BigChampagne denies the allegation. It also states that it hasn't helped the Recording Industry Ass. of America (RIAA) identify file-sharers for the purpose of suing them.
That hasn't stopped Altnet threatening to take legal action of its own. It alleges that BigChampagne's snooping system violates its own intellectual property. The irony of the allegation can't have been lost on any of the parties concerned.
View: The full story News source: The Reg
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.