main

SED Televisions to Enter Production in 2008

Christopher Vendemio   on 04 October 2006 - 02:19 · 11 comments & 7014 views

Advertisement (Why?)
It's the technology that Canon and Toshiba have been touting as the ultimate combination of flat panel size with CRT image quality. SED (Surface-conduction Electron emitter Display) replaces the one large cathode ray tube found in large bulky CRT televisions with tiny electron emitters in the number of one for every pixel. When will this miracle technology be available for the public to buy en masse? Well, the first model, a 55" 1080p display, has finally been announced and will enter mass production in the first quarter of 2008. I know, I know, you guys want the numbers. Well, as stated, the display will be full on 1080p resolution and will sport a brightness level of 450cd/m2 and a contrast ratio of 50,000:1. Combine those specs with a 1ms response time and you have the early makings of an amazing display.

News source: Engadget

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 11 additional comments
#1 Express on 04 Oct 2006 - 02:36
How much xray is thing going to throw out?
(1 reply) #2 slimy on 04 Oct 2006 - 02:45
price?
#2.1 Burnz316 on 04 Oct 2006 - 03:08
im guessing alot of $$$ are needed for this badboy..
#3 Croquant on 04 Oct 2006 - 02:51
Sounds good, but I'll believe it when I see it.
(4 replies) #4 rIaHc3 on 04 Oct 2006 - 03:08
OLED > SED
#4.1 Liquid on 04 Oct 2006 - 03:43
Umm no. OLED has a way to slow refresh rate.
#4.2 lodgepole on 04 Oct 2006 - 04:46
My intitial reaction was to the 1ms refresh. Sports should look good so long as the encoding is decent as well.

Quote -
OLED has a way to slow refresh rate.

I agree. My understanding was OLED is biologically based which in my book means slow = horrible refresh rate.

Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of OLED and if it requires less power and no loud 60 cycle hum of the plasma's I welcome it with open arms!
#4.3 kronik on 04 Oct 2006 - 05:20
OLED also has a much shorter life span
#4.4 rIaHc3 on 04 Oct 2006 - 13:26
Umm no. OLED has a way to slow refresh rate.
OLED also has a much shorter life span

Overtime, these issues will be fixed.


Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of OLED and if it requires less power and no loud 60 cycle hum of the plasma's I welcome it with open arms!

Exactly and its cheaper compared to both LCD and SED.
(1 reply) #5 Qoogirl on 04 Oct 2006 - 04:43
By 2008, most of us who are too poor/too disinterested/don't even care that much about TV, let alone TV in HiDef will probably already still be loving our SDs or have LCDs and Plasmas in our homes for less than $700 for a 40" (I hope).

SED needs to come in with a competitive price point, cablecard capabilities (if that's still an issue in '0, at least 3 HDMI, and some other boom-bang features for me to turn my head...
#5.1 acrophile on 04 Oct 2006 - 05:07
Quote - Qoogirl said @ #5
at least 3 HDMI


If you're going to buy a high-end tv, you probably have a decent a/v receiver which should be the one doing the hdmi switching. This also means you probably don't use the craptacular speakers found in most tv's so that's even more of a reason to keep your hdmi in your a/v receiver where the audio portion of hdmi will be routed correctly.

or whatever.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)