Spotted this over at Bit-Tech earlier today:
"A Microsoft spokesman... told us that Windows Vista will not require a system re-activation unless the hard drive and one other component is changed. This means that enthusiasts will be able to swap CPUs, memory and graphics cards out without any worry about having to re-activate with MS, either on the internet or by phone.
Should you change the hard drive and another piece of hardware - for example for a major upgrade such as a motherboard change that requires a re-installation - Microsoft will allow you to re-activate up to 10 times. You will not, however, be able to have more than one machine activated concurrently."
This could pose some serious problems for enthusiasts that are constantly switching rigs or components around. Although Microsoft reserves the right to allow more than 10 activations per copy, the bit-tech folks believe keeping a base 'activated' image of Vista might save some headaches down the road.
Update: Yes, the article is rather vague but does raise some interesting issues. Most importantly, what does Microsoft consider a re-activation to be? According to the article you wont have to 're-activate' a copy of Vista unless you change the hard drive and an additional component. If I simply reformat my existing Vista PC and run the activation wizard, will I have used up one of my ten activations?
View: Bit-Tech
"A Microsoft spokesman... told us that Windows Vista will not require a system re-activation unless the hard drive and one other component is changed. This means that enthusiasts will be able to swap CPUs, memory and graphics cards out without any worry about having to re-activate with MS, either on the internet or by phone.
Should you change the hard drive and another piece of hardware - for example for a major upgrade such as a motherboard change that requires a re-installation - Microsoft will allow you to re-activate up to 10 times. You will not, however, be able to have more than one machine activated concurrently."
This could pose some serious problems for enthusiasts that are constantly switching rigs or components around. Although Microsoft reserves the right to allow more than 10 activations per copy, the bit-tech folks believe keeping a base 'activated' image of Vista might save some headaches down the road.
Update: Yes, the article is rather vague but does raise some interesting issues. Most importantly, what does Microsoft consider a re-activation to be? According to the article you wont have to 're-activate' a copy of Vista unless you change the hard drive and an additional component. If I simply reformat my existing Vista PC and run the activation wizard, will I have used up one of my ten activations?
















Regardless, if someone is upgrading their hard drive so often, I think the cost of Vista is the least of their concerns.
Regardless, if someone is upgrading their hard drive so often, I think the cost of Vista is the least of their concerns.
There are so many 'combinations' of things that can go wrong - doesn't just have to be the hard drive. Say you had a hard drive failure, motherboard replacement, a new hard drive and a reformat all in a year from a virus or whatever - thats 4 gone already.
My point is - who has actually said "oh dear - I need to buy a new windows copy" due to activation? Not many I bet - and not many will. The people who actually want to get past it will pirate it anyway, so its an unneccessary restriction put into place for the sake of it.
Regardless, if someone is upgrading their hard drive so often, I think the cost of Vista is the least of their concerns.
There are so many 'combinations' of things that can go wrong - doesn't just have to be the hard drive. Say you had a hard drive failure, motherboard replacement, a new hard drive and a reformat all in a year from a virus or whatever - thats 4 gone already.
My point is - who has actually said "oh dear - I need to buy a new windows copy" due to activation? Not many I bet - and not many will. The people who actually want to get past it will pirate it anyway, so its an unneccessary restriction put into place for the sake of it.
and that's only for ONE YEAR. If Microsoft keeps on pace of releasing OS's every 5 years... you'll definitely go over the 10 times.
Not quite:
- One may install a RAID system (0+1) so that's 4x HDDs;
- You may upgrade all the HDD's;
- They may fail;
- Motherboard might fail;
- May wanna' get a new motherboard;
- May wanna' test a motherboard off a friend before purchasing your own;
- Hardware enthusiasts running benchmarks on a monthly basis.
So many different reasons why one may require 'change' (20 years huh? um...okay, I'm going to remain with solid-state hard drives for that long).
Hardware enthusiasts usually get the test hardware free (permanent or temporary), but they still have to shell out for the O/S. And despite that, people are always cost conscious - I couldn't justify the extra costs of the O/S license.
I understand that as a worldwide percentage, the numbers are low (but we're still talking about a LOT of people) - but the target audience for the 'Ultimate Edition' is hardware and game enthusiasts (aka upgrade freaks for testing and/or pleasure).
But it is good to hear that it's 10 and not the rumoured 2.
Not quite:
Ok, fine. I neglected RAID arrays. Still:
1 reactivation, not 4
1 reactivation
1 reactivation
No reactivation necessary (HDD(s) are the same)
No reactivation necessary (HDD(s) are the same)
No reactivation necessary (HDD(s) are the same)
No reactivation necessary if the HDD(s) don't change
I didn't say 20 years on the same HDD. I said it would take the average user 20 years to go through all 10 activations...
Regardless, if someone is upgrading their hard drive so often, I think the cost of Vista is the least of their concerns.
There are so many 'combinations' of things that can go wrong - doesn't just have to be the hard drive. Say you had a hard drive failure, motherboard replacement, a new hard drive and a reformat all in a year from a virus or whatever - thats 4 gone already.
My point is - who has actually said "oh dear - I need to buy a new windows copy" due to activation? Not many I bet - and not many will. The people who actually want to get past it will pirate it anyway, so its an unneccessary restriction put into place for the sake of it.
Again, as the article states, reactivation is only necessary when you swap out a HDD and one additional component. If your motherboard fails, you don't need to reactivate.
The scenario you presented would only require 1 re-activation:
- HDD failure : no reactivation
- Motherboard replacement : reactivate
- new HDD : no reactivation
- reformat : no reactivation
i was just thinking that. if you test a component, say a new hd and mobo, you dont need to reactivate for 30 days, so you can go ahead and test it out. also, if something fails, and you reformat the hard drive, you dont need to reactivate, because it said replacing HDD and one other component. or, contrary to reactivation, you can just do a system restore right to when you first installed windows (or another stable time)
The whole activation system is flawed. They should just make a USB dongle (or other physical copy protection device), which could be installed internally for OEM machines, that is registered to a specific person or institution. It would allow you to reinstall as many times as you want and if it gets stolen then the user could report it as such, with it being disabled next time someone tries to activate Windows online. The current system basically treats all users as thieves, with Microsoft carefully watching over and imposing absurd restrictions. The current system is disgusting - if they had a system that worked properly they wouldn't these stupid restrictions.
Since 2000, I've been through four. And I'm not a storage freak.
There are also other reasons you'd hook in a new drive even without strict replacement.
I tried to test if a system problem was software by hooking up a new drive and installing clean to it. That avoided any possibility of upsetting the original configuration.
Why not a USB dongle instead? New PCs have 8 billion USB ports, no need for remote approval, and it effectively enforces "only one system can use a given licence at a time" without playing games with "what's a new system?"
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2006/10/26/Mi...on_to_bit-tech/
"Windows Vista will not require a system re-activation unless the hard drive and one other component is changed. This means that enthusiasts will be able to swap CPUs, memory and graphics cards out without any worry about having to re-activate with MS, either on the internet or by phone."
So you can install Vista infinite times on the same Hard Disk because your hardware is not changed i.e. when you format the Hard Disk you don't change the hard disk hardware!!
And you can change CPU or Mem or Graphics cards or Hard Disk infinite times.
Is it so difficult to understand this???!!
I find stupid that Neowin asks: "If I simply reformat my existing Vista PC and run the activation wizard, will I have used up one of my ten activations?"
Last edited by franzon on 27 Oct 2006 - 17:57
Windows XP had 10 activations and then you had to speak to MS to get the OS reactivated again so what's the problem with that. Anybody who reinstalls their OS all the time shouldn't own a computer in the first place.
And if you installed a new motherboard, what's that image going to do for you?
Last edited by lardiop on 26 Oct 2006 - 16:49
And if you installed a new motherboard, what's that image going to do for you?
True Image with Universal Restore works wonders.
call me stupid but if i buy something id like to keep control of it , maybe im just expecting too much these days from people who only care about money heh
i know that but tbh i find it rather stupid that they have to limit their customers like this , you buy something and are limited , you get a free linux distro and there's no limit to how many times you can install it , hell you can even get a pirated version of xp and there is no limit , i just fail to see how this is good for the legit user in the long run ? just like i fail to see how it benefits the legit user with all this wga malarky , but like i said i guess i expect too much from people who all they care about these days is money heh
call me stupid but if i buy something id like to keep control of it , maybe im just expecting too much these days from people who only care about money heh
In the super-edge cases where you run out of activations - all you have to do is call MS support and they're extremely accomodating.
Last edited by Lasker on 26 Oct 2006 - 16:45
"A Microsoft spokesman... told us that Windows Vista will not require a system re-activation unless the hard drive and one other component is changed."
If no hardware changes and you're just doing a format/reinstall, then no re-activation is necessary.
As long as your HDD serial number doesn't change (which it never will regardless of formatting) - it's the same HDD as far as activation is concerned.
A reformat would juts check the hardware list up against the one stored at their server, same hardware, they just dwonload yoru existign activation. it's not ac "actual" re-activation as such. or rather it's a re-activation, but not an activation but...
If your doing a reformat you should be to save the activation file so you don't need to reactivate, like xp. Least I hope so.
Well actually you ARE allowed to sell/transfer Vista once, but no such thign existed for XP.
Well actually you ARE allowed to sell/transfer Vista once, but no such thign existed for XP.
Wrong, it depends on your country. There are a lot of UK people that sell Windows licences. It was recently tested in the courts and found to be legal.
In practice, people sell their copy of XP irrespective of whether it is OEM or not.
In practice, people sell their copy of XP irrespective of whether it is OEM or not.
OEM is NOT tied to a machine.. OEM software can only be supplied with a hardware purchase.
whether that hardware be a complete Pc or just a graphics card is irrelevant.
uk courts ruled that selling the license with the CD is legal. but you must also once you have sold that cd/license remove any copy of that cd/license from your system.. ie.. you sell your cd/license to a friend.. you must remove that license from your PC as you have sold it, so essentially it is not your property anymore.. you must use a new license..
To all the people bitching, this only counts if you replace the hard drive AND something else, get a clue. New hard drives, reformatting, new RAID arrays etc. DO NOT COUNT.
I'm not even sure if replacing the entire motherboard would count, providing that's all that's replaced.
But the point is, as long as you don't swap out your hard drive each time you buy or install a new component, then this wont be a problem and even at that, how many of you have replaced a hard drive AND something else at the same time 10 times since XP was released?
That is what my situation is. I have reinstalled XP on my machine so many times, that activating over the net doesn't work anymore. I always have to call in and do it over the phone. I never had any problems with that aspect. Is Vista going to be the same way. If you activate 10 times over the net and need to do it again, just call in and give them the installation ID and they give you a code back?
Also, how would Vista know that the hard drive hasn't been changed if you completely wipe the drive and repartition/reformat. With XP, I wipe my drive and reinstall XP and it has me reactivate everytime. How is Vista going to do this differently?
then say u move vista to a secondary HD
i have an 80 and a 160 gig drive..currently windows is on the 80
if i moved to the 160..is that a reactivation?
If the system goes 'tits up', you have a working, activated ISO ready to restore.
But after some thinking, it kinda makes sense it is the hard drive the thing you have to change for vista to be suspicious. After all, it's the HD where the installation phisically resides. You can move your HD anywhere and that installation will still be the same.
Plus, if it is "the HD AND something else", you can change the HD first, without changing anything else, and after a while, change the other thing (the mobo, the CPU, whatever). You change two things, but not at the same time. That still keeps the same "activation" right?
/slippery slope
/slippery slope
Think that up all by your loner self? Go back to class, the bell has rung.
don't you have 15 days to activate...and isn't there only 7 days in a week
Even easier and 100% legal!
I think that going to the warez way its less problematic... waiting for cracked version or corporate.... or otherwise i stick with XP, sorry i dont feel that all this its right they should focus more on dropped vista features than crap like wga and activation that no one likes and only affect legit users.
1. viruses
2. adware/spyware
3. a combination of the above
4. 'experimenting' with system options/files
5. unexplained 'acts of god'
6. "hackers" (big emphasis on the ""
10 activations is insane. its not a question of weather or not i will need 10 or 1000, i bought your damn software i should not be limited to how many times i install it. for god sakes apples don't even have cirts of authenticity let alone an activation process.
what are you talking about? after you use up all your free instant activations (usually 4-8 on a retail copy or 1-3 on an OEM builder installed copy) all you do is use the phone authentication (1800-571-2048 ) and spend the 8 minutes reading off and typing in codes. its not that big of a deal.
what are you talking about? after you use up all your free instant activations (usually 4-8 on a retail copy or 1-3 on an OEM builder installed copy) all you do is use the phone authentication (1800-571-2048 ) and spend the 8 minutes reading off and typing in codes. its not that big of a deal.
I've NEVER had that happen.... I've activated a retail copy of XP Pro probably 40 times on the same system and never once had to call them
Change any one component other than the HDD constitutes as the "one other device" - and if at any time you change the HDD you must re-activate.
- Build your machine and put everything together - HDD and non-HDD hash code is generated based on the hardware - 1 activation and both hash codes uploaded to MS.
- Re-build the entire machine except the hard drive - Non-HDD hash code mutates - no activation, but mutated hash code uploaded to MS.
- Change the main HDD - HDD hash code has mutated - 1 activation, and both hash codes are uploaded to MS.
This could easily happen in 1 month, so 10 activations could easily be used in a single year... of course you would really have to try to do this, but it is do able.The only logical step for enthusiasts is to start building machines with more than 1 HDD, so Windows ties itself to a single HDD and users can swap the others... which we do already.
Microsoft is targeting the users who purchase their machine instead of building it...
I don't like the "Big brother" feel, but MS has 95% of the market and it won't change anytime soon.
The odds of you replacing 10 hard drives with another piece of major hardware before the next time you want to buy a new OS are slim to none. If you do manage to go thru 10 hard drives, you should consider killing yourself.
The odds of you replacing 10 hard drives with another piece of major hardware before the next time you want to buy a new OS are slim to none. If you do manage to go thru 10 hard drives, you should consider killing yourself.
its not JUST swapping hardware. its anytime you want/need to reinstall the os as well.
mr know it all
The odds of you replacing 10 hard drives with another piece of major hardware before the next time you want to buy a new OS are slim to none. If you do manage to go thru 10 hard drives, you should consider killing yourself.
its not JUST swapping hardware. its anytime you want/need to reinstall the os as well.
mr know it all
Actually, no. If you don't change any hardware, you won't have to activate anew, but simply re-activate via a rememberence of your first, initial activation which Microsoft has/knows of. So reformating is fine. I see no problem with this at all. Why are your motherboards and hard-drives all failing anyway you computer 'enthusiasts'? Aren't you supposed to be more intelligent than the average computer user; for whom they won't fail often enough for these 10 activations to go away for a LONG time? Secondly, just buy one SATA 2 HDD for any OS installations, present and future and use that for Vista; always. Stop making up stupid sh*t to bash Microsoft's licensing terms. These news are perfectly fine.
Last edited by daniel_rh on 27 Oct 2006 - 11:39
However, what an article of this Bit-Tech can say
- Activation is the hardware certification with an HDD and another computer part
- Activation being possible to ten times again
It is written that concern of an enthusiast is removed by these 2.
It is the article which it does not write definitely which sale form this depends on.
It is the argument that depended on a totally untrustworthy article in this, and this is really meaningless.
It is for Microsoft to interfere it about constitution of our computer virtually to prescribe the number of times of activation.
It is synonymous with helping you for a future plan of Microsoft to argue about such a license.
Should not we insist that there should be a right to use a software license for regardless of a change of constitution of a part definitely if for a normal product?
I take treatment same as a criminal by an illegal copy and why must pay expense of that purpose more?
A criminal should judge it by a law. I cannot understand why we must obey a personal law of Microsoft
If it says without being afraid of misunderstanding, it is often important to think fundamentally and radically.
A user of we Japan continues a much basic argument from the country of the Far East.
【An agent】Part 7 that Vista limits transfer of the OS【Haunting】
http://pc7.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/jisaku/1161787670/l50
"Vista limits transfer of the OS"
http://wiki.nothing.sh/964.html
I watched a company on a network-affiliated note article, the user of we Japan always repulsed the anonymous fingers of the intentional company which I guided.
We repeat such an experience and repeat an argument in "2ch".
Our society made wiki in a very reason with a little interest to a computer. However, a so detailed thing is not lacking in wiki.
Because detailed information is discharged from prison by an all person and a flow of money, and understand it entirely; is because social.
I want you go over a border if it gets used freely to go over a border and Japanese to argue.
On the other hand, some of we "2ch"er may contribute to you.
Last edited by maxmini1978 on 27 Oct 2006 - 04:36
When was XP first released? I know "whistler" was being tested throughout 2000 and into 01, and XP was released late in 01.
When I first got XP, I was installed on an 800mhz P3 with a voodoo3. I think I had an 8 GB hd. That system was old then, but it was still good enough to play games.
1600xp, OCed, 60gb drive. a couple years later 1900XP OCed. I have 2 30gbs, 2 80gbs, 2 160s, and just recently a few months ago, 2 300s. To this day, I still will pop in my 80s or 120s, to see if I can find some old files from a few years ago. There is just no way possible I can plug 8HDs at a time.
Im still on a 1900xp, and have been since 04 which is ions ago. I know people who had systems simmilar to mine, then wentout and got a Amd 64 on that 754 pin in 04, who later maybe later last year or during sometime this year, are now on that 90nm new 940 pin, or the pentium EEs.
How many video cards have come through since then?
Well to make a long story short, Ill just list some of the componets ive bought since then, ive had geforce 2, geforce 3, and a radeon 9800. My radeon 9800 is beyond old. I got in in nov of 03, and it was old [like 4-5 months old yet still one of the top cards] when i got it. I said to myself I would get a new card/system last year but I have yet too.
I consider myself an "enthusiast," but not having the extra cash to freequently get new stuff, I have managed to change major componets more than 10 times, let alone the reinstalling windows. I usually go about 12-18 months between windows instillations, which is ions for some people.
The bottom line, anyone who thinks this 10 "major" hardware changes is alot, or will be sufficient for "enthusiast" is not thinking long term. If I can get 2 major componets upgraded within a year, I consider myself doing good, but compared to some people who may 6-8 months before turning over their entire system or CPU-mobo and/or vid card between upgrades, im archaic.
I think this 10 reactivations wont work. MS will weither scrap it, or change it, because for the 5 years or so between New OS, 10 wont be enough unless you pay for another license, which is what MS is trying to make people do.
you can buy a cheap IDE controller PCI card. You can connect 4/8/?16 HDDs to it, and it has built-in hardware RAID. All for the price of about 30$
you can buy a cheap IDE controller PCI card. You can connect 4/8/?16 HDDs to it, and it has built-in hardware RAID. All for the price of about 30$
first, why would someone get an IDE controller card - old technology... Second, you can't get an "affordable" 4, 8 or 16 IDE or SATA controller card that has true hardware raid. A true hardware raid controller card (has on-board processor and memory to handle the throughput - which is going to start at $300+) -- see what I mean?
ok... maybe you weren't meaning true-hardware raid, but still - an 8 or 16 controller without raid support is going to need considerably more power and processing cycles so guess what... you're gonna need an on-board cpu and memory... which costs money.
2-4 connections w/ pseduo-raid is about all you're gonna get with 30 bucks - don't post drivel
Isn't it obvious? to connect his IDE drives he cannot connect.
I mentioned RAID. I didn't say onything about your vague "truE Raid".
He doesn't need RAID anyways.
I meant something like this or this
Don't think so. Whe I was buying 4controller IDE card they asked if I want 8, and it was not much more expensive.
maybe. But isn't that enough?
Don't post when you have really bad mood :-)
Seriously you run out of liscenses all you have to do is call up Microsoft like you did with XP and they are very leinant.
Now I know for sure I want to buy this edition of Windows and not deal with the bs WGA like in Vista.
This is just a scam.
Will linux get DirectX 10?
We are even now.
I don't anticipate doing that with gold, however.
I can see the motherboard as being the key to requiring activation but not the HD.
Last edited by oscarntommy on 27 Oct 2006 - 13:38
It costs the same as far as I know.
some years ago people were saying they'll stick to Win98 because it's more stable.
Last edited by RealFduch on 27 Oct 2006 - 20:44
THINK ABOUT IT. YOUR COPY OF WINDOWS COULD LAST 100 YEARS OR MALWARE COULD RIP YOU OFF ENTIRELY IN DAY. MICROSOFT IS WAY TO ACCOMADATING TO VERY CROOKED RETAILERS.
BEST IDEA OF ALL IS TAKE WALK & THEN PUT EQUIPMENT INTO BASEMENT FOR 3 YEARS, THEN TRY AGAIN WITH ENTIRELY NEW SYSTEM. OR BETTER YET, GO LINEUX.
Signed
that article isn't 100% accurate though as i've 'ghosted' my system drive between a 320, 200, 120, 400 and a couple times in between and i can tell all of you without a mustard seed's size of doubt that changing the hdd alone will warrant a reactivation. as soon as you run the repair option on the dvd (not a full re-install, just to fix bcd) the system tells you that you have 3 days to reactivate windows to keep using it.
btw it will also screw-up VSC (unless someone can recommend a utility that can 'ghost' without messing things like that up).
1. Allow user to easily backup the activation file and restore it when we need to reinstall it. as we know that most people need to reinstall the windows many times.
do not force the user to reactivating after reinstallation.
2. Do not asking for re activations when user; Adding the memory, changing the video cards, adding new hardware such as network cards, adding harddisk, upgrading the processor.
and the Full pack/ FPP must be able to works as now without the re activation trouble
I suggest reactivations need to be done when user change the harddisk or motherboard. and user can have few times.
3. It is better to detect if the serial number used single or multiple times when it is online. and shut down the system or warn it first it it is pirated.
for OEM also microsoft need to soften little bit. do not make user difficult with reactivation many times.
Please microsoft listen what user wants. I know microsoft need to reduce the pirated.
check the numbers... i'm sure they also point to this conclusion.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.