main
Report a problem

OPTi Initiates Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Apple

Slimy   on 19 January 2007 - 04:08 · 20 comments & 6951 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Apple is hiring. You don't need any knowledge in computers or technology. A law degree is required however.

Apple is in court fairly often; I'm sure almost everyone is aware of the recent Cisco case. Most people are not so aware of this one though. OPTi Inc. announced today that it had filed a lawsuit on January 16 against Apple Inc. for infringing on three of OPTi’s patents (U.S. Patent No. 5,710,906, Patent No. 5,813,036 and Patent No. 6,405, 291). All three patents are part of what OPTi refers to as "Predictive Snooping of Cache Memory for Master-Initiated Accesses." According to OPTi, Apple utilizes the Predictive Snooping technology in its line of Mac servers, desktops and laptop computers. OPTi isn't suing just Apple; the small Mountain View, California-based company is pursuing patent infringement lawsuits with other "unnamed companies" as well.

I'd like to mention that OPTi has a very elaborate website, check it out below.

Link: OPTi
News source: DailyTech

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 20 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 b@nned on 19 Jan 2007 - 04:15
LMAO @ their website
#1.1 +stifler6478 on 19 Jan 2007 - 04:22
I actually lol'd

-Spenser
(1 reply) #2 guylaroche on 19 Jan 2007 - 04:29
Wow.... That website is pathetic. Is this another one of those patent-holding companies that don't actually do anything with their patents? Like the company that sued RIM?
#2.1 Sp3ctranova on 19 Jan 2007 - 07:27
That case was such BS.
What good is a patent if you don't make something cool using it?

Oh, right. A lawsuit. Well that's freakin' pathetic.
#3 david13lt on 19 Jan 2007 - 04:36
Yeah, "WoW", really amazing website... I don't think their are going to use win anything at all. Apple is Apple. Microsoft had a lot of problems and still haves and Apple has them too. Just Apple is smaller for now, and most of the companies will try to "kill" it before it becomes too big like ex. Microsoft.
#4 not_cool on 19 Jan 2007 - 05:06
Ditto the wow, also just looked at the source out of curiosity (since it looked like crap) and they don't even have a DTD, I'm guessing they've never updated it.
#5 invalidbuffalo on 19 Jan 2007 - 05:10
http://www.opti.com/ <-- DAAANG! I wish I could make my website that awesome!

Who knows... Maybe they'll strike an agreement: Apple makes a site for opti, and opti drops the case!

............nawwwt!
(2 replies) #6 Hak Foo on 19 Jan 2007 - 05:12
Didn't they used to make chipsets a LONG time ago? Back before it really mattered whose chipset you had on your board?
#6.1 GreyWolfSC on 19 Jan 2007 - 05:22
Quote - (Hak Foo said @ #1)
Didn't they used to make chipsets a LONG time ago? Back before it really mattered whose chipset you had on your board?


They still make chipsets... and it still matters who made the one on your board... ask anyone with one of the buggy nForce boards, or someone with a VIA board that has USB problems...
#6.2 Hak Foo on 19 Jan 2007 - 05:44
Quote - (GreyWolfSC said @ #6.1)
Quote - (Hak Foo said @ #1)
Didn't they used to make chipsets a LONG time ago? Back before it really mattered whose chipset you had on your board?


They still make chipsets... and it still matters who made the one on your board... ask anyone with one of the buggy nForce boards, or someone with a VIA board that has USB problems...


No I said "Before it mattered".

It seems like chipsets became less of a commodity in the mid-Pentium 1 era, when Intel's chipsets became the 'name brand' of the market, and everyone started aping them (remember "TX Pro" boards?) They've been since.

so says the irritated ULI M1695/1697 board owner who will never see a driver update again.
#7 Izlude on 19 Jan 2007 - 05:30
OMG OPTi!!!!

Does anyone remember back in the Pentium 1 era the OPTi 82C861 sound chipset? The drivers on this thing were almost impossible to install. You had to go through DOS and then later in windows replace 2 files that corrupt themselves. God it was hell!

I wonder what'll happen here.
#8 Robgig1088 on 19 Jan 2007 - 05:36
I hate it when companies do this. What I hate more is when people file for patents on DNA. Ya know.. America really sucks at this patent thing.
(1 reply) #9 Eis on 19 Jan 2007 - 05:48
If you read the source you can see the mistake. They wrote half of the website as a comment. The actual products and stuff are here. -- http://www.opti-inc.com/index4.html
#9.1 not_cool on 19 Jan 2007 - 06:29
Quote - (Eis said @ #9)
If you read the source you can see the mistake. They wrote half of the website as a comment. The actual products and stuff are here. -- http://www.opti-inc.com/index4.html
And yet if you look at the real site it still looks horrible, plus one of the four main links in broken and two others are pages under construction (copyright 2003 or earlier also).
#10 colpax on 19 Jan 2007 - 05:54
I had a quick look at the opti web site source, hmmm all the links have been commented out. To see their main site look here:

www.opti-inc.com

sorry to disappoint anyone thinking something dodge going on but the change was made between 15+24th June 2004 according to my friends at www.archive.com
(1 reply) #11 lammmetak on 19 Jan 2007 - 07:43
Lol what a loosers. Like we hate apple so we are suing them. the rest is ok.
#11.1 +Dakkaroth on 19 Jan 2007 - 11:04
You obviously can't read or write, can you? I'm.. I'm so sorry.
#12 GM_Axis on 19 Jan 2007 - 12:06
Don't make use of your patents? Good luck suing people over them. Apple isn't in a lick of trouble.
(1 reply) #13 TRC on 19 Jan 2007 - 13:51
"Predictive Snooping of Cache Memory for Master-Initiated Accesses."

I have no idea what that means.
#13.1 TurboTuna on 19 Jan 2007 - 15:47
Quote - (TRC said @ #13)
"Predictive Snooping of Cache Memory for Master-Initiated Accesses."

I have no idea what that means.

+1

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)