apple
Report a problem

Apple Inc. & Beatles Apple Corps. Ltd. Reach Legal Agreement

Shane Pitman   on 05 February 2007 - 18:27 · 17 comments & 9285 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Apple Inc. and The Beatles’ company Apple Corps Ltd. are pleased to announce the parties have entered into a new agreement concerning the use of the name “Apple” and apple logos which replaces their 1991 Agreement. Under this new agreement, Apple Inc. will own all of the trademarks related to “Apple” and will license certain of those trademarks back to Apple Corps for their continued use. In addition, the ongoing trademark lawsuit between the companies will end, with each party bearing its own legal costs, and Apple Inc. will continue using its name and logos on iTunes®. The terms of settlement are confidential.

Commenting on the settlement, Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO said, “We love the Beatles, and it has been painful being at odds with them over these trademarks. It feels great to resolve this in a positive manner, and in a way that should remove the potential of further disagreements in the future.”

Commenting on the settlement on behalf of the shareholders of Apple Corps, Neil Aspinall, manager of Apple Corps said, “It is great to put this dispute behind us and move on. The years ahead are going to be very exciting times for us. We wish Apple Inc. every success and look forward to many years of peaceful co-operation with them.”

News source: Apple

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 17 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 drygnfyre on 05 Feb 2007 - 18:41
I wonder if this means that the Beatles will soon be available on iTunes for download?
#1.1 Shane Pitman on 05 Feb 2007 - 18:46
That's what's going around the rumor mill. iTunes members who are Beatles fans will finally be able to get their favorite tunes.
(1 reply) #2 vetnw_raptor on 05 Feb 2007 - 18:54
"News source: Apple"

which apple? sorry, couldn't help it...
#2.1 cantstopwontstop on 05 Feb 2007 - 20:02
That was stupid.
#3 Ash on 05 Feb 2007 - 18:59
Now if the band The Doors can settle their lawsuit against MS for Windows over using names of parts of a house that can open, then the world would be at peace!

Thats a joke, by the way, albeit a bad one!
#4 shift4 on 05 Feb 2007 - 18:59
Apple seems to have a lot of issues with trademarks, don't they?

Not sure which side they're on this time however.. lol
#5 Co_Co on 05 Feb 2007 - 19:18
Can't wait for the remastered beatles albums
#6 Galley on 05 Feb 2007 - 19:45
Perhaps this means we'll soon see a Special Edition Beatles iPod. I only hope they offer an 80GB version.
#7 hotdog963al on 05 Feb 2007 - 20:01
Whey!
(2 replies) #8 fergiej on 05 Feb 2007 - 20:05
Yea, this certainly does look positive. For Apple Computers. Apple Corps will now have to license the Apple logo for use with their label? So now they have to pay for their own logo? How is this positive? Like I said in another thread, Apple has become way to arrogant.
#8.1 MrCobra on 06 Feb 2007 - 01:20
Steve Jobs will probably go around saying that he created that logo and owns the rights to it. They seem to be claiming they make more than they actually did - the mouse for instance.
#8.2 Glassed Silver on 06 Feb 2007 - 22:51
do you know apple forced apple corps to aggree to this?
NO...
So what are you complaining about... if apple corps aggreed its ok.

-fm
(2 replies) #9 RaisinCain on 05 Feb 2007 - 21:40
Who the hell doesn't own at least 1 Beatles album (if not all of them) already?
#9.1 +Smigit on 06 Feb 2007 - 02:15
I don't
#9.2 Glassed Silver on 06 Feb 2007 - 22:53
neither do i and a lot of young people who maybe like their music, but just dont own an album...

-fm
#10 studio57lie on 06 Feb 2007 - 05:16
"Let It Be"
#11 Glassed Silver on 06 Feb 2007 - 22:49
I love peace...
this is a perfect end.
thanks for not making it a muddy fight...

-fm

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)