main
Report a problem

Lenovo tops eco-friendly ranking

Slimy   on 04 April 2007 - 23:34 · 15 comments & 6530 views

Advertisement (Why?)
According to Greenpeace, Chinese computer maker Lenovo is the world's most eco-friendly electronics firm (scoring 8 out of 10) while Apple is last (scoring 2.7 out of 10) of the 14 profiled. The quarterly report ranks firms by how green their production processes are and what they do to recycle hardware they sell. Lenovo, which bought IBM's consumer electronics division in 2005, offers takeback services for any broken or obsolete merchandise in all the nations where its products are sold. Lenovo lost marks for still using some of the most toxic substances to make its products. Greenpeace criticised Apple for not setting a deadline for eliminating some toxic chemicals from its production processes.

The study, which was first compiled in 2006, looks at how big electronics firms make their hardware to see if they use toxic chemicals in the production process and scrutinises what they do to recycle goods when customers have stopped using them. The campaigning group said that overall scores for the hi-tech firms it profiled had improved (nine out of 14 now score more than five out of 10) but it shied away from describing any hardware maker as "green". Iza Kruszewska, Greenpeace international toxics campaigner, noted that in the last 12 months, firms have started to act rather than just issue statements of intent.

Link: Forum Discussion (Thanks Hum)
News source: BBC News

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 15 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 bibutteryboy on 04 Apr 2007 - 23:36
Quote -
while Apple is last (scoring 2.7 out of 10)

but damn. Don't they look pretty
#1.1 h3xis on 05 Apr 2007 - 00:00
Quote - (bibutteryboy said @ #1)
Quote -
while Apple is last (scoring 2.7 out of 10)

but damn. Don't they look pretty

Are you saying the ThinkPad isn't pretty?
#1.2 Magallanes on 05 Apr 2007 - 21:13
Quote - (h3xis said @ #1.1)
Quote - (bibutteryboy said @ #1)
Quote -
while Apple is last (scoring 2.7 out of 10)

but damn. Don't they look pretty

Are you saying the ThinkPad isn't pretty?


Apple looks fine if you like the gayness style, a black notebook suit better for machos ;-)

#2 Gary_Player on 05 Apr 2007 - 00:03
Yea, apple does need to work on that... I don't know what they're doing WRONG per-say, but something they need to be doing RIGHT is offering Recycling of old computers when you buy a new one.

Just offer. Noone will do it because resale on macs is so good
(1 reply) #3 Nose Nuggets on 05 Apr 2007 - 00:05
does that classify as ironic? the hippy/artsy computer manufacture has the lowest 'green' rating while it has a respectable market share of individuals who make a point to be extra 'green'?

#3.1 antaris on 05 Apr 2007 - 07:37
I think they might be more interested in maintaining market share then being RoHS compliant...
(1 reply) #4 bluep3ace on 05 Apr 2007 - 00:09
i remember Lenovo used to be near the bottom with Apple. nice to know they've improved.
#4.1 +Dakkaroth on 05 Apr 2007 - 08:42
That's exactly what I was thinking. They were looking pretty bad, but I'm really glad to see they shaped up. I guess they really didn't want to sit next to Apple. (rotten maybe?)
#5 SniperX on 05 Apr 2007 - 09:47
Quote -
Greenpeace criticised Apple for not setting a deadline for eliminating some toxic chemicals from its production processes.

That must really hurt -- being criticised by a legally toothless organisation of idealists (who don't mind breaking the law from time to time, or sailing their ships around the world, which, I presume, must run on fresh air) who are unable to realise that we're not going to return to the days of living in caves, just to appease their really quite bizarre agendas.

Last edited by SniperX on 05 Apr 2007 - 09:57
(1 reply) #6 wctaiwan on 05 Apr 2007 - 11:49
I don't know... But Greenpeace seems to hate Apple for not doing exactly what it's asking for

http://www.apple.com/environment/

Apple HAS done things to make their products eco-friendly and stuff, according to them, but they just aren't doing what Greenpeace wants.

wctaiwan
#6.1 plastikaa on 05 Apr 2007 - 13:10
Just because they have a pretty page explaining stuff they are doing - it doesnt mean they are good at it. It simply means they are doing "something".

A company doesnt need a page explaining what you are doing to be eco, you should just do it anyway. Its just Apple trying to look good on their site.

Apple people might hate PC (Windows mainly) users, and visa versa. But at the end of the day, its Apple who are destroying the planet the most out of these companies.

(1 reply) #7 betasp on 05 Apr 2007 - 18:53
I don't think I have ever made a decision based on how eco-friendly a company is. I have owned both Leveno and Apple products. But I will say this...


Quote -
Greenpeace criticized Apple for not setting a deadline for eliminating some toxic chemicals from its production processes.
Apple does not own factories, they outsource system building. Using "its" implies ownership.
#7.1 teriba on 05 Apr 2007 - 19:19
Quote - (betasp said @ #7)
I don't think I have ever made a decision based on how eco-friendly a company is. I have owned both Leveno and Apple products. But I will say this...


Quote -
Greenpeace criticized Apple for not setting a deadline for eliminating some toxic chemicals from its production processes.
Apple does not own factories, they outsource system building. Using "its" implies ownership.


No, using "its" implies control. They have control over which companies perform the manufacturing and they can influence how they build their products.
#8 Lare2 on 06 Apr 2007 - 00:45
Who cares if apple is last. Their machines looks so cool...... oh and three times faster than previous models
#9 Beastage on 06 Apr 2007 - 09:41
From hippy to ultra capitalism.... how legends fall - if you would tell to Steve Jobs and Steven Wozniak back in the 70's or 80's that their company will become a giant monopolistic (itunes content) and a major pollution creator, they'd prolly freak out ...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)