main
Report a problem

Google to buy Doubleclick for $3.1 Billion

Slimy   on 13 April 2007 - 23:18 · 25 comments & 12192 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Search engine leader Google has announced it will buy top digital marketing services firm DoubleClick for $3.1 billion from private equity firm Hellman & Friedman, which bought DoubleClick for $1.1 billion in 2005. The deal, Google’s largest to date, will likely help boost Google’s presence in the area of Internet display advertising, not that it doesn’t already dominate the market. DoubleClick specializes on placing and serving banners and other display ads on prominent Web sites. Google CEO Eric Schmidt noted that the addition of DoubleClick to Google's business would strengthen Google's position with large brand-name advertisers, who tend to rely more on display ads than the search ads that Google specializes in.

The companies added in the statement that the deal, which should close by the end of the year, will lead to more relevant ads for consumers and a more efficient ad buying and selling process for online publishers and advertisers. Google's deal for DoubleClick is both a blow to Yahoo and Microsoft, which were also interested in buying DoubleClick. DoubleClick also announced earlier this month that it was setting up an auction-based online exchange for buying and selling Internet ads, making it even more attractive to the bidders. When asked about why Google felt the need to pay as much as it will for DoubleClick, Schmidt responded: "When we looked at DoubleClick, we felt after a very detailed financial analysis that we could afford to pay this and that it would be a good deal for us and our shareholders." Google has more than $11 billion in cash on its balance sheet.

Link: Forum Discussion (Thanks AthleticTrainer1981)
News source: CNN

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 25 additional comments
#1 cardg on 13 Apr 2007 - 23:25
Hope this doesnt means less profit on adsense for us
#2 +Rappy on 13 Apr 2007 - 23:53
Interesting purchase...
(5 replies) #3 MaceX on 14 Apr 2007 - 00:21
Google is becoming a monopoly by buying up the competition
#3.1 MrCobra on 14 Apr 2007 - 00:48
Yep. I can't wait to see them being raked over the coals by the US and EU antitrust people.
#3.2 cybershark on 14 Apr 2007 - 01:26
The competition includes Yahoo and Microsoft.

But seriously though, they may eventually get to the monopoly percentage.
The antitrust people will say sorry Google you must give some of your search/advertising clients to your competitors.
What do you think Google's clients will say/do?
#3.3 faraaz on 14 Apr 2007 - 02:02
Quote - (MrCobra said @ #3.1)
Yep. I can't wait to see them being raked over the coals by the US and EU antitrust people.


i dont think google is using anticompetitive practices tho, they are just spending their money because they have too much
#3.4 Aleck79 on 14 Apr 2007 - 08:16
Quote - (cybershark said @ #3.2)
The competition includes Yahoo and Microsoft.

But seriously though, they may eventually get to the monopoly percentage.
The antitrust people will say sorry Google you must give some of your search/advertising clients to your competitors.
What do you think Google's clients will say/do?


having a monopoly is not illegal...however using anti-competitive practices to obtain/keep a monopoly is illegal. As faraaz said, I don't think google is using anti-competitive practices.
#3.5 brent3000 on 14 Apr 2007 - 10:10
as long as there is MS and Yahoo and all the smaller ones i dont think there going to get hammered much..
#4 Amano on 14 Apr 2007 - 00:24
A new world record after Youtube last purchase
(5 replies) #5 SHOTT3R on 14 Apr 2007 - 01:43
So long as the AdblockPlus lists continue to update, I can continue not to care.

It's amazingly jarring when I use others' machines, realizing just how much advertising I'm not seeing. Unreal.
#5.1 Matt Zander on 14 Apr 2007 - 02:20
Isn't it just. When I jump on another PC without ad-blocking, I think "How do people surf like this?"
#5.2 jim87654 on 14 Apr 2007 - 04:27
Quote - (Matt Zander said @ #5.1)
Isn't it just. When I jump on another PC without ad-blocking, I think "How do people surf like this?"
Yet the vast majority of people don't use ad blocking of any kind.

Atlas, the biggest competitor to DoubleClick will likely have MS, Yahoo et al. bidding for it.
#5.3 MrCobra on 14 Apr 2007 - 06:07
I couldn't ever use another PC without (good) ad-blocking software. Since December 26th (reinstall) I've save 76gig of bandwidth and had a clean viewing experience.
#5.4 shade88 on 14 Apr 2007 - 07:26
Quote - (MrCobra said @ #5.3)
I couldn't ever use another PC without (good) ad-blocking software. Since December 26th (reinstall) I've save 76gig of bandwidth and had a clean viewing experience.


You sure about that figure? Seems extremely high for a few months of surfing, they don't put uncompressed MPEG2 into ads you know.

But yes, I share the same sentiments. But, that's why I carry a version of portable firefox on my usb equipped with the adblockplus extension (among others). I don't ever use other people's browsers.
#5.5 tsutton on 14 Apr 2007 - 14:15
Quote - (MrCobra said @ #5.3)
I couldn't ever use another PC without (good) ad-blocking software. Since December 26th (reinstall) I've save 76gig of bandwidth and had a clean viewing experience.


I feel sorry for you... reinstalling on a Boxing Day (unless specific reasons like not celebrating Xmas due to religion)
(1 reply) #6 astrokat on 14 Apr 2007 - 04:16
3.1 Billion Dollars?? Thats lunch money for Bill ... he could still buy it if he wanted.
#6.1 chris4 on 14 Apr 2007 - 15:09
Just what I was thinking. Microsoft can easily buy DoubleClick if they want.
(1 reply) #7 guruparan on 14 Apr 2007 - 06:06
Most said innovation of google in areas other than search & ads seems to fail over...so, they dont want to get into trouble by lossing there name & brand..so, they are sticking into the search & ad field itself..

But 3 billion dollars is really a waste...


And as for the Online services offered, Microsoft's Ray Ozzie is blowing up the google with his ideas on online stuffs...we will be getting those services this year end..need to see whether google will be another netscape :-)
#7.1 Aleck79 on 14 Apr 2007 - 08:21
Quote - (guruparan said @ #7)
Most said innovation of google in areas other than search & ads seems to fail over...so, they dont want to get into trouble by lossing there name & brand..so, they are sticking into the search & ad field itself..

But 3 billion dollars is really a waste...


And as for the Online services offered, Microsoft's Ray Ozzie is blowing up the google with his ideas on online stuffs...we will be getting those services this year end..need to see whether google will be another netscape :-)


Your dreaming...

Microsoft has a big fight on their hands, they are going to have to fight an uphill battle if they want to get anywhere in the online advertising biz. Although there is room for Microsoft to take a share, its highly unlikely that Microsoft will just come in take the crown away from Google.
(1 reply) #8 Sniper101 on 14 Apr 2007 - 08:36
>.< o dear not doubleclick there the worst for spyware and adware
#8.1 Yuxi on 14 Apr 2007 - 11:49
I'm hoping that will change after this...
#9 Angel Blue01 on 14 Apr 2007 - 13:37
As long as this changes Doubleclick's annoying policies this is good.
#10 Fred Derf on 14 Apr 2007 - 15:34
So then who would be the main competitor against Google+Doubleclick?

It does smell of a monopoly.
#11 xpablo on 14 Apr 2007 - 16:30
still wont stop me from blocking their ads, with my host file
#12 Samboini on 15 Apr 2007 - 10:15
As long as everything is legal Google's monopoly will be non-problematic.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)