main
Report a problem

AMD unveils strategy to 'Bulldoze' the competition

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 27 July 2007 - 10:14 · 7 comments & 3395 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Executives at AMD are pursuing a new strategy to combine CPUs and graphics processors into one unit and put them into everything from workstations to HDTVs to wireless phones. At a meeting of industry analysts and journalists Thursday at AMD's headquarters in Sunnyvale, California, AMD outlined its two-pronged approach of continuing to sell to the server and desktop computer markets while also pursuing the growing market for multifunction cell phones and consumer electronics like gaming consoles and Web-connected TV set-top boxes.

The strategy is intended to leverage AMD's 2006 acquisition of graphics processor ATI Technologies and expand beyond AMD's core server and PC market to the growing home entertainment and mobile device markets. While intended to enhance AMD's stance against chip rival Intel, one analyst said it would pit AMD against new challengers already in the mobile space. AMD calls it the "Bulldozer and Bobcat" strategy, said Phil Hester, corporate vice president and chief technology officer for AMD. The Bulldozer line represents the server, workstation, and PC market, while Bobcat, a reference to a smaller type of construction vehicle that is about the size of a fork-lift, represents smaller handheld devices and consumer electronics.

View: The full story
News source: InfoWorld

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 7 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 Soham on 27 Jul 2007 - 10:19
I knew this going happen
#1.1 Unplugged on 27 Jul 2007 - 10:32
It makes sence in certain integrated systems which is what there proposing though.

I seriously dount you going to one day buy a CPU with twin SLi graphics on-chip but then again who knows.
#2 C++ on 27 Jul 2007 - 13:28
'Bulldoze,' huh? That is some fine ****-talking. But then again, ****-talking is the only department where AMD still has the lead.

I think I'll wait until they actually have a product to show before believing it. Especially during these times of net losses of up to $600 million for AMD.

Neither AMD nor ATI are market leaders right now. And they don't have anything but trash talk up their sleeve because if they did, they would show it.

Oh and correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Intel developing their own dedicated graphics chips as we speak, and even working towards improving their current IGPs?

I'm quite positive that if CPUs and GPUs molded together is the way of the future, then other companies will make their own and not sit by idle while AMD 'bulldozes' them.

Yea...
(3 replies) #3 MvT Cracker on 27 Jul 2007 - 14:01
ati just delayed direct x 10 cards till next years its stock is tanking = the companies going down the toilet

amd dose not have 45nm yes on its quad core chips

they have been keeping quiet about the quad cores fsb=less than intels

and intel beat them to quad core cut prices and amd still has no commercial users of amd quad and have made almost no sales

more promises and more failed promises
#3.1 tkyoshi on 27 Jul 2007 - 17:34
Just a correction, AMD does not use an FSB.

The memory controller is integrated into the CPU, they use the HyperTransport bus to communicate with other components on the motherboard.
#3.2 Croquant on 27 Jul 2007 - 17:55
Quote - (tkyoshi said @ #3.1)
Just a correction, AMD does not use an FSB.

The memory controller is integrated into the CPU, they use the HyperTransport bus to communicate with other components on the motherboard.

Just because the memory controller is integrated into the CPU doesn't mean that there's no Front Side Bus speed. It just means that it applies differently than it does on a machine with an Intel CPU.
#3.3 tkyoshi on 28 Jul 2007 - 03:38
Quote - (Croquant said @ #3.2)
Quote - (tkyoshi said @ #3.1)
Just a correction, AMD does not use an FSB.

The memory controller is integrated into the CPU, they use the HyperTransport bus to communicate with other components on the motherboard.

Just because the memory controller is integrated into the CPU doesn't mean that there's no Front Side Bus speed. It just means that it applies differently than it does on a machine with an Intel CPU.


Well AMD uses the HyperTransport Bus. HyperTransport is used as a replacement of the Front Side Bus.

In technical terms the term "front-side-bus" is not applicable to AMD's newer processors, but yes there is a bus. The FSB interconnect from the CPU to Northbridge (Memory Controller) has been removed. Furthermore HyperTransport allows direct communication to other components on the board.

Quote -
the frontside bus is the physical pathway between the CPU and the RAM controller. AMD64 (Athlon 64, Opteron, and Athlon 64-FX) processors have integrated memory controllers, meaning that there is no FSB, technically. Instead, AMD64 processors are measured by their bus speed, which is determined by the number of HyperTransport links that they employ

http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/133/

Quote -
HyperTransport
AMD Athlon64, AthlonFX, and Opteron CPU's utilize the HyperTransport Bus.

These CPU's move the memory controller into the CPU, effectively eliminating the Front Side Bus.

http://www.tech-faq.com/front-side-bus.shtml

Quote -
The memory controller is no longer on the northbridge chipset. Instead, AMD has taken control of this aspect of the system and has integrated the controller onto the CPU die itself. Latency has been reduced significantly due to this, so this certainly comes as a very welcome change. Because the memory controller is located on the processor die, the memory subsystem traffic no longer has to go through the chipset for CPU-to-memory calls. Hence, the old term "front-side bus" isn't really applicable any longer. With AMD64 processors, the speed at which the CPU and memory controller interface is at full processor frequency.

http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTI0

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)