hardware
Report a problem

Intel Launching New 45nm CPU Lineup Monday

Slimy   on 15 November 2007 - 01:47 · 17 comments & 14139 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Intel Corp. plans to roll out its newest generation of processors Monday, flexing its manufacturing muscle with a sophisticated new process that crams up to 40 percent more transistors onto the company's chips. The world's largest semiconductor company expects to start shipping 16 new microprocessors — which also boast inventive new materials to stanch electricity loss — for use in servers and high-end gaming PCs. The most complex chips being launched Monday have 820 million transistors, compared with the 582 million transistors on the same chips built using the current standard technology. Intel's first chips, introduced in the early 1970s, had just 2,300 transistors.

Advances in chip technology occur as smaller and smaller lines are etched onto the chips. Intel's new chips shrink the width of those lines to an average of 45 nanometers, or 45 billionths of a meter, compared to 65 nanometers on the previous generation of chips. The smaller circuitry allows Intel to squeeze more transistors — the building blocks of computer chips — onto the same slice of silicon. That accelerates performance and drives down manufacturing costs. The transistors on the new chips are so small that more than 30 million of them can fit onto the head of a pin. Performance zooms ahead with smaller transistors because more of them are available, they twitch faster to process data and less energy is required to power them.

View: Full Story @ MSNBC

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 17 additional comments
#1 Tantawi on 15 Nov 2007 - 01:56
Go Intel Go!
(4 replies) #2 RAID 0 on 15 Nov 2007 - 01:59
All these goodies, so little money to spend on more computers.

My fist PC was a Packard-Bell 386 SX-15. It came with a whopping two megs of RAM and a 80 Meg hard drive. Now, the processors have 12 megs on the CPU it-self. Just think, in twenty years what we're gonna be playing with. BRING ON QUANTUM COMPUTING!
#2.1 Tantawi on 15 Nov 2007 - 02:16
Unless we die by then? lol
#2.2 RAID 0 on 15 Nov 2007 - 02:16
Quote - (Tantawi said @ #2.1)
Unless we die by then? lol


We can only hope.
#2.3 Tikitiki on 15 Nov 2007 - 02:17
Quote - (Tantawi said @ #2.1)
Unless we die by then? lol


Depends on the generation I think I'll be safe for at least another 50 years
#2.4 +Dakkaroth on 15 Nov 2007 - 10:25
Quote - (Tikitiki said @ #2.3)
Quote - (Tantawi said @ #2.1)
Unless we die by then? lol


Depends on the generation I think I'll be safe for at least another 50 years


50 years? Hrm.. 69 I'll be. Great number too.
#3 MioTheGreat on 15 Nov 2007 - 03:52
Mmm. High-k dielectrics....
#4 nX07 on 15 Nov 2007 - 04:53
Very intense, bring it on!
(2 replies) #5 balupton on 15 Nov 2007 - 05:37
So how do they know how to build these things, surely no mind would be able to know where 820 million transistors are, and the patterns they need to follow...
#5.1 MioTheGreat on 15 Nov 2007 - 06:10
Intel probably has their own high level language for describing the layout, which is then converted into the actual CMOS design by a computer. That, or they provide actual schematics for it, which the computer then physically lays out. I'm not sure what they do on that kind of scale....I mean, obviously on the very low end, you can design them by hand (We had to design a CMOS adder in an EE class), but for anything with more than like 10 FETs (Transistors), no one does that.

Then, there's about 500 steps of various photoetches, and depositing layers of interconnects and laser boring holes for interconnects, ion implantation, etc.

It's a pretty complex procedure.
#5.2 kouhii00 on 15 Nov 2007 - 08:29
you have 30+ years experience design engineers, 30+ years experience process design engineers, 30+ years experience layout design engineers. They create block diagram models to break down each parts of the processor then connect together using lines.

Anyways, just think of it this way, layers after layers of masked patterns are placed on top of each other like hamburgers and connected togther on the z-plane. How do they make these things so small? Look up plasma etching a.k.a. dry etch and MOSFET.
#6 Croquant on 15 Nov 2007 - 08:26
Great, but all we'll see Monday will be the 45nm Xeons and the new Core 2 Extreme chip. For those of us who don't have money to burn, we'll have to wait a while yet, I'm afraid.
#7 Mr.ed on 15 Nov 2007 - 11:57
So.... any pricecuts associated with the new models introduction into the market?

That would be sweet....

Mr.Ed
#8 Naveen on 15 Nov 2007 - 13:19
SSE 4.1 and architectural changes make these chips noticably faster then previous Core 2 labelled processors.

Look out for more processors based on these new processes and designs (....!....) in future as buyers will want to be aware of the extra facility afforded by these newer chips. Sometimes these kind of changes dont really get noticed by the end user as the brand labelling is not changed much (say like Northwood and Prescott used to be, or 25mhz FSB vs 40 )

This is probably deliberate on the part of companies like Intel but I can't see why it would happen to be honest Maybe they are banking on the interestingness of their future products?
(2 replies) #9 ECEGatorTuro on 15 Nov 2007 - 21:43
My wife and I are engineers at Intel in Chandler, AZ and to this day, the 45nm process still blows my mind away. It's amazing what they have done with the gate stack and how the Oregon R&D folks managed to get everything to work in high volume.

Most people don't realize that there are several prototypes of the latest type of transistors in labs all over the world but the trick is how do you get it to work in high volumen manufacturing... this is what Intel is very good at doing!
#9.1 carmatic on 16 Nov 2007 - 00:59
so do you know stuff like, oh i dunnoe, which batches happen to be the best overclocking ones?
#9.2 ECEGatorTuro on 16 Nov 2007 - 18:27
Quote - (carmatic said @ #9.1)
so do you know stuff like, oh i dunnoe, which batches happen to be the best overclocking ones?


Maybe...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)