microsoft

MS wins Patent Suit over tech that improves XP Boot Time

Slimy   on 16 November 2007 - 04:06 · 13 comments & 7737 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Acacia, a company that buys patents and sues other companies, bought U.S. patent 5933639, which was issued in 1999 to Acceleration Software International Corporation, and formed a company called Computer Acceleration Corporation, which then took Microsoft to court. The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, charged Microsoft with infringing on the patent and asked for US$2.50 per copy of Windows XP sold in the U.S. By Microsoft's account, that could have amounted to anywhere between $600 and $900 million. Late in the case, the plaintiff sought to add a claim against Vista but the court denied the request.

Microsoft argued that there are many ways to improve the boot speed of PCs and that XP uses different technology than that in the patent. The jury found that Microsoft did not infringe on the patent and that the patent is invalid because it was obvious and because the technology already existed. In addition, the judge is still considering Microsoft's assertion that the patent holder wrongfully withheld information about the existing technology when filing for the patent. This is the fourth suit that Acacia or its subsidiary companies have brought against Microsoft: one was settled, another Microsoft won during a summary judgment, and another was just filed on Monday.

News source: PC World

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 13 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 X'tyfe on 16 Nov 2007 - 04:20
Quote -
Acacia, a company that buys patents and sues other companies


lawl
#1.1 vetSlimy on 16 Nov 2007 - 04:23
Glad you like the way I put it
#1.2 X'tyfe on 16 Nov 2007 - 04:25
Quote - (Slimy said @ #1.1)
Glad you like the way I put it


hey, atleast there going up against MS, i like um alot
#1.3 t i stone on 16 Nov 2007 - 08:12
I found that line quite amusing too
#1.4 darkpuma on 16 Nov 2007 - 12:29
haha i was going to comment on that line too
#2 Foub on 16 Nov 2007 - 10:56
Someone should sue this company for wasting the court's time and resources.
(1 reply) #3 +mrbester on 16 Nov 2007 - 12:32
Next time, Microsoft should just bury them with extended and protracted methods in order to bankrupt them. I'm all for people protecting their work (except in the ridiculous case of software patents) but this vulture attitude of picking over the bones of defunct companies and attempting to profit from their legacies needs to be curtailed eliminated.
#3.1 yakumo on 16 Nov 2007 - 21:20
That will be exactly why they set up 'Computer Acceleration Corporation' and it's the Computer Acceleration Corporation that sued microsoft, so only they would be likely to be sued into oblivion, at basically no loss to Acacia.
(1 reply) #4 ThePitt on 16 Nov 2007 - 15:03
No wonder. In that country the national sport is suing. No wonder that a complete company do that and nothing more.
#4.1 Lucas on 16 Nov 2007 - 15:06
Quote - (ThePitt said @ #4)
No wonder. In that country the national sport is suing. No wonder that a complete company do that and nothing more.

Haha so true! It's a sport! =p
#5 C_Guy on 16 Nov 2007 - 15:48
"This is the fourth suit that Acacia or its subsidiary companies have brought against Microsoft: one was settled, another Microsoft won during a summary judgment, and another was just filed on Monday."

So, of the three that have reached a conclusion, Acacia settled one and lost 2. A little desperate for cash aren't we? Find some other company's time to waste.
#6 Tzimisce on 16 Nov 2007 - 20:50
there are a lot of these companies, and think to yourselves - Microsoft unfortunately is one of them too!
#7 Foxxx428 on 16 Nov 2007 - 21:41
Wait a minute... Improves XP Boot Time??? I agree that after the logon screen XP boots faster than Vista but why in the hell does the boot screen show me the scrolling bars 9 to 13 times when Vista shows me 2 or 3? Freaking prefetch is crappy at best in either OS.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)