The Home Office held a private meeting with Phorm in August last year, but BT's interception and profiling partner did not disclose that it had completed an allegedly illegal trial of its technology on tens of thousands of unwitting broadband subscribers just weeks earlier.Senior civil servant Andrew Knight revealed the meeting had taken place in a response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOI) request from a member of the public, passed to The Register. Today, the Home Office said it had no knowledge of the secret interceptions until we revealed the 2007 trial on 27 February and the 2006 trial on 1 April this year. BT reps were not present, Knight's note implied. The Home Office refused to disclose further details of who was present at the August 2007 meeting with Phorm, how it was arranged, or what was discussed, saying that the information remained the subject of an ongoing FOI inquiry.
View: The full story @ The Reg
I've never really understood why BT, Talk Talk and Virgin would want to get in bed with a man who was responsible for one of the worst rootkits in history (Apropos).
Members who don't know about who BT are wanting to do business with may want to read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorm
In other words, they're trying to find some excuse for not disclosing details because they know what they did was illegal and are hoping to shroud the whole thing in secrecy (such as claim it was for "security reasons" ) to encourage people to not bother their little heads with such things as gross invasion of privacy.
Just tell your non-tech friends to visit Do Not trust Webwise, it's a simple warning about all this rubbish.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.