microsoft
Report a problem

Office 2010 optimized for Windows 7

Andrew Fairbairn   on 16 May 2009 - 20:16 · 76 comments & 34761 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Since a technical preview version of Office 2010 leaked barely a day ago it seems to have spread to anyone and everyone, despite a limited official technical preview scheduled for July. We already knew that Office 2010 will ship in both 32-bit and 64-bit versions (and the technical preview was leaked in both these flavours) and earlier this week it was confirmed that it will run on Windows XP SP3, Windows Vista and Windows 7 as well.

Robert McLaws is one of the many who has downloaded and installed the leaked build on Windows 7, and has discovered that parts of the Office suite have been optimised for Windows 7 by utilising the new jump lists feature. Here you can see Outlook 2010 taking advantage of it by using a jump list to provide a list of useful tasks.


[Image source: Robert McLaws]

The jump list will surely come in handy by providing quick links to Outlook's four main functions - your email, calendar, contacts and tasks - and to create a new message or entry for each of these tools. By dragging a file from the jump list of another application onto the navigation pane in Outlook it automatically opens the compose email window with that file as an attachment. The taskbar icon for Outlook also shows you when you have have a new email message as you can see in this image, taken recently at the TechEd 2009 keynote.

[Image source: TechRadar]

From what we can tell, the jump lists of other programs in the Office 2010 will offer the usual list of recent and pinned files. If you are tempted to try out the leaked Office 2010 Technical Preview version then be aware: we've been tipped off that the build won't run as well as it should as it is still an earlier version of the code that will be used in the official Technical Preview which should be available in July.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 76 additional comments
(5 replies) #1 gamestargrinder on 16 May 2009 - 21:53
Definably a added bonus, I hope other apps like Windows Live Mail will eventually be using jump lists like outlook
#1.1 Rev. on 16 May 2009 - 22:00
+1 Will other apps besides MS apps be able to take advantage of the jump list?
#1.2 Sam Symons on 16 May 2009 - 22:07
Rev. said,
+1 Will other apps besides MS apps be able to take advantage of the jump list?

They should be able to. Otherwise I'm sure developers will kick up a storm about it :p I'm sure I heard something about an API being available, though I'm not 100% on that, sorry.
#1.3 nekrosoft13 on 16 May 2009 - 22:36
gamestargrinder said,
Definably a added bonus, I hope other apps like Windows Live Mail will eventually be using jump lists like outlook

windows live messenger already does, just the added "menu" is in start menu hover over it to see it
#1.4 GP007 on 16 May 2009 - 22:52
The jump list API is open and documented, all you have to hope for is that devs aren't lazy about it and use them when win7 is out.
#1.5 Jugalator on 17 May 2009 - 10:05
Rev. said,
+1 Will other apps besides MS apps be able to take advantage of the jump list?

Yes. Microsoft has even developed "helper code" for .NET to assist in this:
http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/WindowsAPICodePack
(4 replies) #2 Anaron on 16 May 2009 - 21:59
It's no surprise that Office 2010 is optimized for Windows 7. In fact, I would've been surprised if Microsoft didn't optimize it. I'm sure we'll see more software taking advantage of the new features in Windows 7.
#2.1 Radiance_Wes on 16 May 2009 - 22:05
Anaron said,
It's no surprise that Office 2010 is optimized for Windows 7. In fact, I would've been surprised if Microsoft didn't optimize it. I'm sure we'll see more software taking advantage of the new features in Windows 7.


Yes, this happened a lot in Vista, I'm sure history will repeat itself, except Windows 7 has many new features for programs to be optimize for.
#2.2 PGHammer on 17 May 2009 - 04:32
Anaron said,
It's no surprise that Office 2010 is optimized for Windows 7. In fact, I would've been surprised if Microsoft didn't optimize it. I'm sure we'll see more software taking advantage of the new features in Windows 7.


Each version of Office for Windows was optimized for the *flagship* Windows flavor at the time (Office 95 for Windows 95, Office 97 for NT 4.0, Office 2000 for Windows 2000, etc.); all the better to encourage *tag-team* deployments of Windows and Office together. This is not even CLOSE to being the first time that betas of Office and Windows have overlapped (the first Office 95 TAP consisted entirely of Windows 95 beta-testers). Therefore, the surprising thing would have been that Office 2010 were NOT optimized for Windows 7.
#2.3 Anaron on 17 May 2009 - 07:23
PGHammer said,
Each version of Office for Windows was optimized for the *flagship* Windows flavor at the time (Office 95 for Windows 95, Office 97 for NT 4.0, Office 2000 for Windows 2000, etc.); all the better to encourage *tag-team* deployments of Windows and Office together. This is not even CLOSE to being the first time that betas of Office and Windows have overlapped (the first Office 95 TAP consisted entirely of Windows 95 beta-testers). Therefore, the surprising thing would have been that Office 2010 were NOT optimized for Windows 7.

Ah, I see. I really didn't know that. It makes sense.
#2.4 buletov on 17 May 2009 - 08:04
All od these items can be added to the standard XP right click menu on the taskbar's application buttons.
(13 replies) #3 Julius Caro on 16 May 2009 - 22:21
is "optmised" the word here? that's like saying that office 2007 is "opmitised" on vista because it uses aero. it's just the jumplists!!
#3.1 Anaron on 16 May 2009 - 22:31
Yes, it is the right word. You can't find jump-lists in Windows Vista or Windows XP. It's a feature unique to Windows 7. Office 2010 is "optimized" for Windows 7 because it's getting the most out of Windows 7. As for Aero in Windows Vista, that's merely a theme.
#3.2 +Brandon Live on 16 May 2009 - 23:42
I think they're referring to custom jump lists (with tasks like New Appointment, etc).
#3.3 Mike on 17 May 2009 - 00:04
Brandon Live said,
I think they're referring to custom jump lists (with tasks like New Appointment, etc).


It's still not really optimisation, more taking advantage of features in a new OS and quite frankly, shouldn't we expect it to? I really don't see how this is news unless we're going see other programs being "optimised" for windows 7 on here..
#3.4 Lord Ba'al on 17 May 2009 - 01:45
Julius Caro said,
is "optmised" the word here? that's like saying that office 2007 is "opmitised" on vista because it uses aero. it's just the jumplists!!

Yes, the new jump list alone doesn't make it optimised.
However, it's only a Tech Preview, so there may come more, actual optimisations for Win7.
#3.5 Calum on 17 May 2009 - 02:55
Mike said,
It's still not really optimisation, more taking advantage of features in a new OS and quite frankly, shouldn't we expect it to? I really don't see how this is news unless we're going see other programs being "optimised" for windows 7 on here..

It's news because it's new; something which hasn't been done in Office suite before. Isn't that one of the definitions of news? - something which is new and hasn't been done before? I think it is...

Last edited by Calum on 17 May 2009 - 03:05
#3.6 PGHammer on 17 May 2009 - 04:43
Calum said,
It's news because it's new; something which hasn't been done in Office suite before. Isn't that one of the definitions of news? - something which is new and hasn't been done before? I think it is...


Optimizations for a specific version of Windows are far from being new for Office; in fact, *every* version of Office for Windows has optimizations specific to the *flagship* flavor of Windows at the time. (This has, in fact, nearly gotten Microsoft in hot water more than once with the Justice Department; Microsoft's Information Worker business unit [which is directly responsible for Office] had been accused of using undocumented system calls in Office to execute those optimizations. That case fell apart when it was pointed out that not only were the system calls that Office used extremely well-documented, but that Microsoft didn't even wholly own the Foundation Classes on which the calls were based [back then, as is the case today, Microsoft is simply one party that has rights to the Windows Foundation Classes].) So it *has* been done before, and in Office; in fact, it's actually quite typical for Office.
#3.7 Anaron on 17 May 2009 - 07:25
Mike said,
It's still not really optimisation, more taking advantage of features in a new OS and quite frankly, shouldn't we expect it to? I really don't see how this is news unless we're going see other programs being "optimised" for windows 7 on here..

Aye! Look up the definition of "optimized".
#3.8 Julius Caro on 17 May 2009 - 07:29
Julius Caro said,
is "optmised" the word here? that's like saying that office 2007 is "opmitised" on vista because it uses aero. it's just the jumplists!!


isnt optimize "make better"? such a small feature doesnt necessarily make it better. "adapted to windows 7" or something like that is what im talking about. when I read "office 2010 optimized for windows 7" i understand that it runs better on windows 7, but i doubt that is the case. and by reading other comments i think some people agree with me.
#3.9 Calum on 17 May 2009 - 12:39
PGHammer said,
Optimizations for a specific version of Windows are far from being new for Office...

I meant Microsoft Office has not taken advantage of the jump lists in Windows 7 before. It hasn't, right?

That's what I mean when I say this is news, because it is new and has never been done before.
#3.10 geoken on 17 May 2009 - 13:37
Julius Caro said,
isnt optimize "make better"? such a small feature doesnt necessarily make it better. "adapted to windows 7" or something like that is what im talking about. when I read "office 2010 optimized for windows 7" i understand that it runs better on windows 7, but i doubt that is the case. and by reading other comments i think some people agree with me.


Whether people agree with you or not is irrelevant. Look up the definition of optimized. Changing something to make use of a feature in something else amounts to optimization.
#3.11 Julius Caro on 17 May 2009 - 15:19
geoken said,
Whether people agree with you or not is irrelevant. Look up the definition of optimized. Changing something to make use of a feature in something else amounts to optimization.


Considering that half the comments on this article are discussing wether or not the word is correct there, I'd say it is relevant.


1. To make as perfect or effective as possible.
2. Computer Science To increase the computing speed and efficiency of (a program), as by rewriting instructions.
3. To make the most of.


for #1, you can't measure perfectness on a computer program. for #2, that's not what the article is talking about. #3 would be the only one that would fit, but it's jumplists we're talking about, hardly something that would make office on windows7 better than on other windows.

besides, if we are in a "computer science" context, there's no point in using other meanings.
#3.12 Anaron on 17 May 2009 - 22:26
Julius Caro said,
Considering that half the comments on this article are discussing wether or not the word is correct there, I'd say it is relevant.


1. To make as perfect or effective as possible.
2. Computer Science To increase the computing speed and efficiency of (a program), as by rewriting instructions.
3. To make the most of.


for #1, you can't measure perfectness on a computer program. for #2, that's not what the article is talking about. #3 would be the only one that would fit, but it's jumplists we're talking about, hardly something that would make office on windows7 better than on other windows.

besides, if we are in a "computer science" context, there's no point in using other meanings.

A lot of words have multiple definitions. The use of the word "optimized" is correct since two of the definition fits. The use of jump-lists in Windows 7 makes Office 2010 "as effective as possible." Also, Office 2010 is making the most of Windows 7 by using a feature unique to Windows 7. I could even go as far as saying that using the jump-lists feature makes Office 2010 more efficient than its Windows Vista/XP counterparts.
#3.13 +dead.cell on 17 May 2009 - 23:40
I really disagree with the word "optimized" as well. It's misleading as apparently, that's not how many of us view it. Optimize to us says,"It runs faster and/or more efficiently." I guess clarity doesn't exactly matter though.

Not sure why Calum is arguing about it being newsworthy. Maybe some people may not find it to be that, but if you guys want to report on it, that's fine. My only beef is how you're going about saying it. Though, I guess if the title said,"Office 2010 Makes Use of Jumplists", people would probably say, "Well, spluh..." and move along.
(2 replies) #4 JonathanVP on 16 May 2009 - 22:50
The UI is a tad different and takes awhile to get used to...
#4.1 andrewbares on 17 May 2009 - 00:42
Yea Outlook confuses me right now.

Oh, does your Outlook 2010 have the feature where it recognizes names in an email and when you click on them it shows the contact info??? I've seen that in screenshots but it's not in the leaked version
#4.2 jasondefaoite on 17 May 2009 - 05:09
No need to click, if you mouse over it shows the information.
(7 replies) #5 Magallanes on 16 May 2009 - 22:56
office 2010 optimized for windows 7
or
office 2010 unoptimized for the rest of windows.
#5.1 Calum on 16 May 2009 - 23:42
Well it makes sense for Microsoft to optimise their software for the latest version of Windows. The final RTM build of Windows 7 will be out to the public by the time Office 2010 is released.
#5.2 LiquidSolstice on 17 May 2009 - 01:04
Um.

Just because Vista doesn't have jumplists doesn't mean 2010 will perform worse on it.

Fail
#5.3 Silverskull on 17 May 2009 - 02:28
LiquidSolstice said,
Um.

Just because Vista doesn't have jumplists doesn't mean 2010 will perform worse on it.

Fail

There ya go.
#5.4 Anaron on 17 May 2009 - 07:27
LiquidSolstice said,
Um.

Just because Vista doesn't have jumplists doesn't mean 2010 will perform worse on it.

Fail

True. Who said it would perform worse in Windows Vista? Simply because it's optimized for Windows 7 doesn't mean it'll perform better (as in faster). It means it'll make use of features in Windows 7 that aren't in Windows Vista or Windows XP. And one of those features is jump-lists.
#5.5 artzm on 17 May 2009 - 08:37
@LiquidSolstice
It's definitely optimized to use features of Windows 7.
Um.
Fail?
#5.6 Calum on 17 May 2009 - 12:43
artzm said,
@LiquidSolstice
It's definitely optimized to use features of Windows 7.

Yes, but it also works just as well as any previous Microsoft Office suite on Windows XP (SP3) and Windows Vista. It may even run faster on those operating systems for all anyone knows...
#5.7 geoken on 17 May 2009 - 13:39
artzm said,
@LiquidSolstice
It's definitely optimized to use features of Windows 7.
Um.
Fail?


Unless you can point out how said optimization makes it work worse on Vista he's right.
#6 Frank Fontaine on 16 May 2009 - 23:56
Looking forward to the test release of this.
#7 MentalDisturb. on 17 May 2009 - 00:13
I agree that this isn't really 'optimised' for Windows 7.
When I read the article title I thought that Office 2010 had better performance on Windows 7 than on Vista or XP.

It's still pretty sweet tho, I hope more developers take advantage of this...
(1 reply) #8 ajua on 17 May 2009 - 01:02
The title should read "Office 2010 takes advantage of Windows 7 new features"...

However, I'm sure Microsoft will optimize many things like performance and other things when run in Windows 7.
#8.1 daniel_rh on 17 May 2009 - 14:56
ajua said,
However, I'm sure Microsoft will optimize many things like performance and other things when run in Windows 7.


They should!, Powepoint is an example, I'm still dreaming with a Powerpoint using WPF or something similar.
(6 replies) #9 LiquidSolstice on 17 May 2009 - 01:05
Wow, kiddies, get over it, it doesn't mean your current OS is totally obsolete now.

It just means Office 2010 utilizes a new feature in 7 to its advantage. Big whoop. Stop whining.
#9.1 Pam14160 on 17 May 2009 - 01:39
+1, +1. . .etc.
#9.2 Anaron on 17 May 2009 - 07:29
Finally, someone that understands the meaning of "optimized". Office 2010 merely takes advantage of the jump-lists feature in Windows 7. That doesn't mean it'll perform better than Office 2010 in Windows Vista.
#9.3 Julius Caro on 17 May 2009 - 07:33
Anaron said,
Finally, someone that understands the meaning of "optimized". Office 2010 merely takes advantage of the jump-lists feature in Windows 7. That doesn't mean it'll perform better than Office 2010 in Windows Vista.


that is not the meaning of optimized!! when it comes to software you use the word optimization to refer to raw performance.
#9.4 ajua on 17 May 2009 - 09:33
Anaron said,
Finally, someone that understands the meaning of "optimized". Office 2010 merely takes advantage of the jump-lists feature in Windows 7. That doesn't mean it'll perform better than Office 2010 in Windows Vista.

Well, "optimized" is a lot different than "takes advantage of". I can "understand" what the title really meant, but i still find it incorrect.

I agree with LiquidSolstice, let's all get over it.

Any info on what's new and how its working? I'm thinking of installing it on a laptop tomorrow. Thanks.
#9.5 GreyWolfSC on 17 May 2009 - 14:18
op·ti·mize (pt-mz)
tr.v. op·ti·mized, op·ti·miz·ing, op·ti·miz·es

1. To make as perfect or effective as possible.
2. Computer Science To increase the computing speed and efficiency of (a program), as by rewriting instructions.
3. To make the most of.

Unless Office 2010 is slower than Office 2007, I'd say it fits all 3 of the meanings for the definition of optimized.
#9.6 Anaron on 17 May 2009 - 22:28
Julius Caro said,
that is not the meaning of optimized!! when it comes to software you use the word optimization to refer to raw performance.

I never said that was the meaning of the word "optimized". You are incorrect. When it comes to software, or anything for that matter, you use the word "optimized" to in place of "make the most of" or "make as effective as possible".
(1 reply) #10 Gary7 on 17 May 2009 - 02:11
I am using it and it rocks. Outlook is really a great deal better.
#10.1 andrewbares on 17 May 2009 - 03:28
Does your Outlook 2010 have the feature where it recognizes names in an email and when you hover over them it shows the contact info??? I've seen that in screenshots but it's not in the leaked version
#11 Silverskull on 17 May 2009 - 02:29
It runs slower than the official tech preview? Good! The leaked copy is already so much faster than 2007 on old processors.

At least for OneNote. It's awesome.
#12 Faisal Islam on 17 May 2009 - 03:40
Nice!
(2 replies) #13 Windows7even on 17 May 2009 - 05:37
to bad the jump lists don't work for word
#13.1 Anaron on 17 May 2009 - 07:31
From what we can tell, the jump lists of other programs in the Office 2010 will offer the usual list of recent and pinned files. If you are tempted to try out the leaked Office 2010 Technical Preview version then be aware: we've been tipped off that the [leaked] build won't run as well as it should as it is still an earlier version of the code that will be used in the official Technical Preview which should be available in July.

Quoted from the article with a minor change for clarification.
#13.2 Zyxel112 on 17 May 2009 - 08:25
it's still under development
(1 reply) #14 skynetXrules on 17 May 2009 - 09:56
one Question came to my mind .


does it have timebomb ? like windows beta that is.
#14.1 Gary7 on 17 May 2009 - 12:16
I would think so.
(1 reply) #15 prabir on 17 May 2009 - 11:45
Optimized? tats not called optimized. optimization means speed, no hangin, smooth ..,. blah blah blah, anyone can put jump list, in their own apps. how tuff is tat.
#15.1 sharp65 on 17 May 2009 - 14:51
prabir said,
Optimized? tats not called optimized. optimization means speed, no hangin, smooth ..,. blah blah blah, anyone can put jump list, in their own apps. how tuff is tat.


It actually is optimized, the startup speed compared to office 2007 is a lot quicker.
(1 reply) #16 oggign on 17 May 2009 - 12:59
Damn, the startup time is amazingly fast, much faster than Office 2007. But the UI is kinda disappointing, hope they will fix it later.
#16.1 Zapak on 17 May 2009 - 13:08
Totally agree , the startup is super-duper-bluper fast on my Windows 7 .

Using x64 Version of Office on my X64 Win 7 RC
#17 xpclient on 17 May 2009 - 15:09
Apps seem to have a fully completely customizable ribbon with any command addable/removable. ultimately putting to rest any menus/toolbars vs ribbon issues. 64-bit even has 64-bit VBA!! In 64-bit, Office Document Imaging/Scanning are missing (dunno about 32-bit), Visual Studio components are 32-bit. 2 new themes besides the one in the screenshot are there but only will be available beta 2 onwards. The Office menu button takes you to a different world that contains a glorified UI for newbies. PowerPoint has got cool modern looking transitions and effects. Outlook and PowerPoint starts up the slowest. As already known, every app including the underdog Publisher has been ribbonized. The 64-bit version also seems to have dropped the legacy Script Editor, Research Explorer bar for IE, Office Web Components etc stuff. VSTO 4.0 runtime is installed along with Office (finally!, thank you MS). There seems to be some "Office Sync Center" and "Business Connectivity Services" (for ppl to build OBAs). A smart tag for IM addresses is new. InfoPath seems to be split into 2 components (Designer and Editor-my guess is Editor will be free). Conditional sum wizard, lookup wizard are gone from Excel. Documentation is not yet in place. File formats can be blocked and unblocked from the UI (instead of registry).
(1 reply) #18 brianshapiro on 17 May 2009 - 15:31
Optimized for Windows 7 and yet on Windows 7 OneNote still appears in the system tray instead of on the taskbar
#18.1 Zyxel112 on 17 May 2009 - 15:54
maybe they're not yet finished doing it
#19 Zyxel112 on 17 May 2009 - 15:56
yey the thumbnail previews in excel are now working in windows 7
(7 replies) #20 jjrambo on 17 May 2009 - 16:45
I bet it will still perform faster on Windows XP then on Windows Vista, 7.
#20.1 skynetXrules on 17 May 2009 - 18:13
jjrambo said,
I bet it will still perform faster on Windows XP then on Windows Vista, 7.


yeap ofc !

the best thing simce WWII !!! :rollingeyes:
#20.2 FrozenEclipse on 17 May 2009 - 19:27
jjrambo said,
I bet it will still perform faster on Windows XP then on Windows Vista, 7.


I bet it won't.
#20.3 Silverskull on 17 May 2009 - 20:38
FrozenEclipse said,
I bet it won't.

I bet FrozenEclipse is right.
#20.4 +Xerxes on 18 May 2009 - 02:23
I doubt it, with super fetch alone in Vista/7 it will outrun XP. Considering 7 is even faster then Vista, you got a snowballs chance in hell of Office 2010 performing better in XP.
#20.5 Zyxel112 on 18 May 2009 - 16:30
jjrambo said,
I bet it will still perform faster on Windows XP then on Windows Vista, 7.


its optimized for 7 with the glass and jumplists
#20.6 jjrambo on 18 May 2009 - 18:37
Zyxel112 said,
its optimized for 7 with the glass and jumplists


Glass and jumplist has nothing to do with performance.
#20.7 jjrambo on 18 May 2009 - 18:37
FrozenEclipse said,
I bet it won't.


XP runs Office 2007 faster then Vista.
(3 replies) #21 Critical Error on 17 May 2009 - 17:31
I need help. Does anyone run Hotmail in Outlook 2010? It needs that connector but it works only with 2007 Any ideas how to make it work?
#21.1 xpclient on 17 May 2009 - 18:08
Configure it for POP3 as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotmail#POP3 or wait for an Outlook Connector update for Office 14.
#21.2 Zyxel112 on 18 May 2009 - 16:46
xpclient said,
Configure it for POP3 as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotmail#POP3 or wait for an Outlook Connector update for Office 14.


thanks for the link I can use it now
#21.3 paesan on 19 May 2009 - 19:14
Thanks, that works

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)