main
Report a problem

Google launches new "Going Google" advertising campaign

Sam Symons   on 03 August 2009 - 04:31 · 47 comments & 7126 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Google and Microsoft seem to be facing off against each other with increasing degrees of fierceness as of late; Microsoft launched Bing a while ago to compete against the search giant, and have recently partnered with Yahoo! to do so. Google has, since then, announced their operating system, dubbed 'Chrome OS', as another competitor against Microsoft's Windows. Now, however, as TechCrunch is reporting, Google has fired another round... in the form of an advertising campaign, called "Going Google."

The aim of this campaign is to show companies of the benefits that switching to Google's Apps can bring; they've introduced a website dedicated to this here, displaying the ways that businesses can be helped out. As TechCrunch states, the advertising campaign has set a rather obvious target of Microsoft Office. They'll be showing the reasons as to, "how and why some 3,000 organizations are signing up to use Google apps each day," although they aren't stopping there. Google are going to have billboards on four major highways in the United States, which will have a new message about Google Apps each day, for a month. As a note, Google says that the materials used for said billboards will all be recycled and environmentally friendly.

Google's taking their message online, obviously, as well; they've set up a Twitter account for the campaign, which will post stories about companies that have "Gone Google." In addition to the previously mentioned website, Google have one that is more about spreading the word, rather than being about the apps themsevles, which you can find here.

If you're a company that has fulfilled Google's desires, if you produce a Google Doc describing your experience, you could win prizes throughout August. This campaign is probably Google's way of trying to get in before Microsoft launches Office 2010, which will have a fully supported cloud computing section, as the search giant's one is. We'll see how Microsoft reacts to this rather shortly, we expect.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 47 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 Rolith on 03 Aug 2009 - 04:33
Google, holding a near monopoly on web-based search and web based advertisements, shouldn't be allowed to automatically promote it's own services just because it's them... these ads should mention all competing services that have at least 1% market share, and do so randomly, without using icons.
#1.1 Aeden on 03 Aug 2009 - 05:13
Hm that seems oddly familiar...=P.
#1.2 idczar on 03 Aug 2009 - 05:44
hmm, its kinda getting hilarious google is somehow feeling its threatened now
#1.3 dimithrak on 03 Aug 2009 - 12:45
idczar said,
hmm, its kinda getting hilarious google is somehow feeling its threatened now

+1
#1.4 M_Lyons10 on 04 Aug 2009 - 16:56
ROFL That's good. LOL
(13 replies) #2 +spenser.d on 03 Aug 2009 - 05:15
Google getting a little nervous?
#2.1 andrewbares on 03 Aug 2009 - 05:41
*Palms sweating*
#2.2 Sam Symons on 03 Aug 2009 - 05:41
spenser.d said,
Google getting a little nervous?

I wouldn't say nervous, just.. competitive
#2.3 cakesy on 03 Aug 2009 - 06:15
spenser.d said,
Google getting a little nervous?


Yes, any company that advertises must be feeling nervous. So Apple is really nervous, with the millions they spend, and Microsoft would be the most nervous of all, with the $500 million it spent trying to make us stop hating Vista.
#2.4 dvb2000 on 03 Aug 2009 - 06:16
spenser.d said,
Google getting a little nervous?


No reason to, Bing only finds about 1/5 of the results that google does, and often it doesn't find any, where google shines through with the results.
#2.5 Calum on 03 Aug 2009 - 10:35
dvb2000 said,
No reason to, Bing only finds about 1/5 of the results that google does, and often it doesn't find any, where google shines through with the results.


Proof, please. I'd like to see some links to queries which give this result, please. I don't believe you. I've been using Bing as my exclusive search engine since it was released and have been very happy with the results I have found. I have, of course, compared it with Google, using the Blind Search, just for testing purposes and even then I found Bing to be better than Google, in some cases; equal to Google in other cases.
#2.6 +Callum M-R on 03 Aug 2009 - 12:28
Calum said,
Proof, please. I'd like to see some links to queries which give this result, please. I don't believe you. I've been using Bing as my exclusive search engine since it was released and have been very happy with the results I have found. I have, of course, compared it with Google, using the Blind Search, just for testing purposes and even then I found Bing to be better than Google, in some cases; equal to Google in other cases.

While Bing's first result is often fairly relevant, it trails off very quickly most of the time.

As an example, searching for "MySpace" (on Live Search I remembere myspace.com wasn't in at least the first 5 results) provides myspace.com and then a MySpace error page. Why would anyone want that?
However yes, typically the results are now maybe on par with Google :p
#2.7 +Kirkburn on 03 Aug 2009 - 12:45
Callum M-R said,
As an example, searching for "MySpace" (on Live Search I remembere myspace.com wasn't in at least the first 5 results) provides myspace.com and then a MySpace error page. Why would anyone want that?
However yes, typically the results are now maybe on par with Google :p

Searching for MySpace brings up a perfectly reasonable set of results here...
#2.8 dimithrak on 03 Aug 2009 - 12:46
cakesy said,
Yes, any company that advertises must be feeling nervous. So Apple is really nervous, with the millions they spend, and Microsoft would be the most nervous of all, with the $500 million it spent trying to make us stop hating Vista.


i dnt think you understood the plot.. apple created the drama.. google's now only realizing it..
#2.9 GreyWolfSC on 03 Aug 2009 - 13:02
Callum M-R said,
While Bing's first result is often fairly relevant, it trails off very quickly most of the time.

As an example, searching for "MySpace" (on Live Search I remembere myspace.com wasn't in at least the first 5 results) provides myspace.com and then a MySpace error page. Why would anyone want that?
However yes, typically the results are now maybe on par with Google :p


I get one result searching for MySpace on Bing. It's MySpace.
#2.10 +spenser.d on 03 Aug 2009 - 14:29
Hey, if there's no reason for them to be nervous, why would they even start advertising?
#2.11 toadeater on 03 Aug 2009 - 20:31
cakesy said,
Microsoft would be the most nervous of all, with the $500 million it spent trying to make us stop hating Vista.


I wonder what a Linux distro could do with $500M in funding instead of wasting it on advertizing?
#2.12 pupdawg21 on 04 Aug 2009 - 00:09
Most of the times when I put a search in Bing and I get few or no results from it and then go to Google and perform the same search I get thousands of results from Google but all of the results I'm willing to look through are totally unrelated to what I'm actually looking for and I stop looking after a page or 2 of results. So it seems to me at least that Bing does a better job of filtering out the garbage links when a query isn't specific enough or indexed adequately by either engine. +1 for Bing imo.
#2.13 cakesy on 04 Aug 2009 - 02:45
spenser.d said,
Google getting a little nervous?


What a joke. Are Google PAYING people to use their search engine, as MS are doing? Are google running competitions, trying to get people interested, as MS are doing? Are google spending millions advertising, as MS are doing?

Yeah, google is nervous. What does that make Microsoft??
(5 replies) #3 vince.macintyre on 03 Aug 2009 - 05:40
First things first... Google is not nervous.

Also, according to "Bing" (Yahoo, Windows Live Search, Windows Search, MSN Search) ads they have 30% of the search market. Which gives Google just 70%. So I guess Microsoft (with nearly 90% of the global PC market) should also advertise for its competitors?

THe logic here is simply... astounding.
#3.1 Rodrigo on 03 Aug 2009 - 05:57
vince.macintyre said,
First things first... Google is not nervous.

Also, according to "Bing" (Yahoo, Windows Live Search, Windows Search, MSN Search) ads they have 30% of the search market. Which gives Google just 70%. So I guess Microsoft (with nearly 90% of the global PC market) should also advertise for its competitors?

THe logic here is simply... astounding.


It's not like Google started with 90% maket share.
#3.2 +Inertia on 03 Aug 2009 - 06:34
Rodrigo said,
It's not like Google started with 90% maket share.



No, it was 100%.
#3.3 Azyr on 03 Aug 2009 - 06:52
Inertia said,
No, it was 100%.


wow...
Do you also change color every 15 minutes from blue to red to yellow then back to blue and onto green to finish off with red?

Coz that would be spectaculary innovative in this new era of hard-hard-core fanboism.
#3.4 Calum on 03 Aug 2009 - 10:38
Inertia said,
No, it was 100%.

No it wasn't. No search engine has ever had 100% market share. Did you never hear of Alta Vista, Lycos and others? They wouldn't have been around if Google magically had 100% market share as soon as it was released...
#3.5 dimithrak on 03 Aug 2009 - 12:48
Azyr said,
wow...
Do you also change color every 15 minutes from blue to red to yellow then back to blue and onto green to finish off with red?

Coz that would be spectaculary innovative in this new era of hard-hard-core fanboism.


lol
(4 replies) #4 ajua on 03 Aug 2009 - 05:45
If Office 2010 cloud applications are good enough for a first release they will dent a pretty big market share from Google Apps.

Google having a campaign with Office as its targe is rather odd. They should instead have focused on Internet search as Bing (along with Yahoo! poses a real threat to them now.
#4.1 cakesy on 03 Aug 2009 - 06:16
How does this make any sense. Google are huge in searching, and are getting bigger each year. Microsoft is desperately trying to stem that loss. Google are venturing into other areas, there Google apps is one area. This is what they are advertising. This makes perfect sense if, you know, you have some common sense.
#4.2 Azyr on 03 Aug 2009 - 06:58
cakesy said,
How does this make any sense. Google are huge in searching, and are getting bigger each year. Microsoft is desperately trying to stem that loss. Google are venturing into other areas, there Google apps is one area. This is what they are advertising. This makes perfect sense if, you know, you have some common sense.


Well actually google is on the "dive" now, and will be for some time before they (probably) regain a huge amount of the search market again and be back to being the monopoly there.

The problem is, while theyre aware that the search business is more "trend" and less "performance", they just can't go full out market the thing as that would make them look "nervous". But they can go on and promote chrome, apps and all that stuff without that issue as they are NEW and/or low marketshare services wich are "cacthing up".

So essentially they're trying to still be in the "public eye" (excuse my english) without hurting their search engines "trendy" image that has been building up for the last couple of years.

Makes sense yes, but not because google search is immune, its because of trends and public opinions etc etc.

Marketing 101... or maybe 301
#4.3 Calum on 03 Aug 2009 - 10:48
cakesy said,
How does this make any sense. Google are huge in searching, and are getting bigger each year. Microsoft is desperately trying to stem that loss. Google are venturing into other areas, there Google apps is one area. This is what they are advertising. This makes perfect sense if, you know, you have some common sense.

Firstly, I completely agree with Azyr.

Secondly, Bing is gaining higher market share as time passes, so far; more than Microsoft expected, according to Steve Ballmer. It's one hell of a good search engine, better than Google (some say), so Google do have something to be worried about. Common sense also tells you that just because a company are currently on top in one market, it doesn't mean they will always be on top
#4.4 ajua on 03 Aug 2009 - 16:15
cakesy said,
How does this make any sense. Google are huge in searching, and are getting bigger each year. Microsoft is desperately trying to stem that loss. Google are venturing into other areas, there Google apps is one area. This is what they are advertising. This makes perfect sense if, you know, you have some common sense.

Well, the way I see it Google is now threaten with Bing+Yahoo! in the search field and will cost them market share over time. There is no doubt about it.

In the Google Docs applications, they are good but the main issues with Office docs will be streamlined by migrating to Office 2010's cloud offering for many companies or users.

I would also worry about not advertising my search engine, not just Google Docs...
(1 reply) #5 tuxplorer on 03 Aug 2009 - 06:47
MS has already announced that Office documents edited in the web apps maintain the exact layout and don't lose fidelity even if the web app doesn't support that feature, how cool is that? Do you have that Google in your Google Docs?
#5.1 guruparan on 03 Aug 2009 - 07:40
+1...

its the real fact that Google is getting nervous each day..
(3 replies) #6 Ravemaster on 03 Aug 2009 - 07:50
How on earth do they put up 31 new billboard ads day after day?
It takes about that long to put them up. (I'd think)
#6.1 +DonC on 03 Aug 2009 - 08:10
They'll fly them in with black helicopters.
#6.2 Azyr on 03 Aug 2009 - 09:03
Only the cover will change, and thats not much tbh - about 1-2 hours work at max per day.
#6.3 +spenser.d on 03 Aug 2009 - 14:31
Ravemaster said,
How on earth do they put up 31 new billboard ads day after day?
It takes about that long to put them up. (I'd think)


There are digital (LED) billboards out there.
(1 reply) #7 Neobond on 03 Aug 2009 - 10:02
Is this the same company that hates the meme "Just 'Google' it!" as in using "Google" instead of "Search"?
#7.1 +d4v1d05 on 03 Aug 2009 - 11:52
Neobond said,
Is this the same company that hates the meme "Just 'Google' it!" as in using "Google" instead of "Search"?

Just Neowin it!

But yeah, "Going Google" != "Just Google it"

Google don't like their name being used as a verb, "Going Google" uses it as a proper noun, which it is... It'd be like "Making it Microsoft" or "Absolutely Apple"
(1 reply) #8 Klownicle on 03 Aug 2009 - 11:37
Our company went google awhile ago, we use there spam engine. .
#8.1 dimithrak on 03 Aug 2009 - 12:53
ok... thanks for sharing that.. i guess.. :|
#9 geoken on 03 Aug 2009 - 13:05
I could clearly see the strings.
#10 wakers01 on 03 Aug 2009 - 13:21
Why does the article say that Google "launched" their new OS? As far as I know they have only announced it; it won't hit for at least a year.
#11 2Cold Scorpio on 03 Aug 2009 - 15:30
Honestly, lately, I've been going away from Google. I find their apps inferior to other alternatives, and use Google search as a second resort if I need different results than what Bing gave (not even saying Bing's results were bad; sometimes the two just give different, equally good results).
(1 reply) #12 ajua on 03 Aug 2009 - 16:12
This article saying that Chrome OS will be a Windows competitor is inaccurate...
#12.1 vetbangbang023 on 03 Aug 2009 - 20:03
No, it's not. It will be a competitor in the netbook arena.
#13 Jebadiah on 04 Aug 2009 - 05:31
I don't see why Microsoft doesn't make Office 2010 Web Apps public already. Even in its beta form, it would give MS a huge head start before the final release. From the previews, it looks fantastic. If the final version isn't free (just like Google Docs) at least with some features, I doubt anyone would choose Office 2010 Web Apps over Google Docs anyway.

(If there is a such a site where I can use it in its beta form, please show me the way.)
#14 M_Lyons10 on 04 Aug 2009 - 16:58
This is interesting. I look forward to seeing Microsoft's response. I really don't think I'd switch to Google's docs though. I've grown to trust them less over the last few years. Their whole idea to move servers onto a boat in international waters to get over regulatory issues was more than a little alarming.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)