Today is Zune HD day in the United States and just as the Zune HD is about to go on sale Microsoft has confirmed that the Zune HD will have applications and games later this year.In a press release, company officials confirm that both Twitter and Facebook applications are due later this year and the following 3D games:
- Project Gotham Racing: Ferrari Edition
- Vans Sk8: Pool Service
- Audiosurf Tilt
















I agree. It looks like the Zune OS would be a reasonable starting point for an updated version of Windows Mobile. Something more touch friendly... The only issue is the fact that they are likely to continue making phones that are not touch as well (As there's a good number of people that prefer it), so it would have to work for that as well...
Yes! My past 2 phones were WM and were pretty capable with features not found on most other devices. Still, over the past year there have been too many new and updated platforms coming out and I had to switch. I was getting tired of cooking new ROMs all the time to squeeze a little more performance out of an aging OS.
Hopefully they work this into WM7 because I've been waiting for a new, 3d-accelerated, Tegra-based WM platform for a while now. For now, though, it's Palm and WebOS for me and, if I had a second choice, Android on one of the flashy new devices just recently out or in the near future.
What they should do is create a Zune phone that is more entertainment oriented, and a Windows Phone that is more business oriented. Making one that does both just as well is difficult - if not impossible.
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09...he_zune_hd.html
Now, I don't believe everything it says in that article, it is from a pro-apple website after all. I still think the oled screen will be amazing, just as with the new Sony walkmans. But I am worried about the processor, it does seem to be built up on hype.
Tegra's ARM11/integrated graphics = 35 fps in Quake III.
Pandora's Coretex-A8 with SGX GPU core =40-60 fps.
It sseem to be underpowered, compared with what is in the iPhone, Google phone and palm.
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09...he_zune_hd.html
Now, I don't believe everything it says in that article, it is from a pro-apple website after all. I still think the oled screen will be amazing, just as with the new Sony walkmans. But I am worried about the processor, it does seem to be built up on hype.
Tegra's ARM11/integrated graphics = 35 fps in Quake III.
Pandora's Coretex-A8 with SGX GPU core =40-60 fps.
It sseem to be underpowered, compared with what is in the iPhone, Google phone and palm.
i'd take anything that article says with a sea of salt grains.
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09...he_zune_hd.html
Now, I don't believe everything it says in that article, it is from a pro-apple website after all. I still think the oled screen will be amazing, just as with the new Sony walkmans. But I am worried about the processor, it does seem to be built up on hype.
Tegra's ARM11/integrated graphics = 35 fps in Quake III.
Pandora's Coretex-A8 with SGX GPU core =40-60 fps.
It sseem to be underpowered, compared with what is in the iPhone, Google phone and palm.
The Microsoft fanbois on this site are going love an article which lays out how bad the Zune HD really is. Of course they will deny it, however the proof will be when, like the fugly Microsoft zune before it, the Microsoft Zune HD will fail miserably with few units sold.
Hmm, have you personally tested this hardware? If not than be quiet. Let people believe Zune HD is great until the hardware is tested by a non-apple fanboi site and than decide rather you really want to stick your neck out into the lions cage.
By the way: Microsoft has Fanboys not Fanbois.
Do you actually read what you write?
Yes, because you're clearly unbiased... *snicker*
With regards to Tegra, it has been shown doing some very impressive things. I am going to hold off on making a determination until I can actually play with it (A benefit you do not seem inclined to give it), but it doesn't appear to be underpowered based on what has been shown running on it.
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09...he_zune_hd.html
Now, I don't believe everything it says in that article, it is from a pro-apple website after all. I still think the oled screen will be amazing, just as with the new Sony walkmans. But I am worried about the processor, it does seem to be built up on hype.
Tegra's ARM11/integrated graphics = 35 fps in Quake III.
Pandora's Coretex-A8 with SGX GPU core =40-60 fps.
It sseem to be underpowered, compared with what is in the iPhone, Google phone and palm.
I'm taking that article with a pinch of salt. Mainly because of this:
"The newest release of Windows Mobile 6.5 won't even work on lots expensive hardware sold in the last year.". That is BS. My Xperia X1 is nearly a year old, and runs WM6.5 easily.
How do they know all these intricate details about the Zune HD's underlying hardware and software? They don't: they're just guessing. Sure, it may be an educated guess, and the Zune HD probably isn't the most state-of-the-art device out there, but the article was written by someone with a pro-Apple, anti-MS slant, with no real solid information - just conjecture.
"The newest release of Windows Mobile 6.5 won't even work on lots expensive hardware sold in the last year.". That is BS. My Xperia X1 is nearly a year old, and runs WM6.5 easily.
Fair enough, don't trust that article explicitly, which is what I said. But you have a leap of logic in your next line.
You have a device that runs wm6.5 Lots of devices bought last year won't run it.
They didn't say no devices will run it, so unless you go out and buy all of last years devices, you can't really prove anything on your own.
If what they say is true, this is a real shame. Of course, the first google phone, g1, won't have enough mem to run the next version of android (cupcake?), so this is hardly new.
The Tegra was demoed using a resolution of 800x480 with Antialiasing and Ansitropic Filtering enabled, two features that were not used with iPhone.
So an image that has 2.5 times fewer pixels with AA and AF turned off, and it is only about 5fps faster? Doesn't seem like the iPhone is that much better to me.
The Tegra was demoed using a resolution of 800x480 with Antialiasing and Ansitropic Filtering enabled, two features that were not used with iPhone.
So an image that has 2.5 times fewer pixels with AA and AF turned off, and it is only about 5fps faster? Doesn't seem like the iPhone is that much better to me.
I don't trust a lot of that article, but either you are confused, or outright lying.
"Above the fold is Quake III running at 35fps with anti-aliasing turned on, while below is HD video output at 720p via HDMI out,"
from here: http://gizmodo.com/5012851/nvidia-tegra-vi...ing-like-butter
You are mashing up 2 different demos. The first, on the device, outputs at zune screen resolution, and does 35fps. Yes, it has anti-aliasing, so we need them to switch it off and see how it compares.
"Nvidia has posted several videos of the its new Tegra mobile SoC in action, and the chip can apparently handle Q3A at 35 FPS at a resolution of 800 x 480 with lightmaps, dynamic lighting, high geometry detail, antialiasing, and anisotropic filtering all enabled."
800x480 == 384000
480x320 == 153600
153600 * 2.5 == 384000
So a 2.5 larger image, with more features enabled, runs 5fps slower than the iPhone version.
Again, where was I lying?
800x480 == 384000
480x320 == 153600
153600 * 2.5 == 384000
So a 2.5 larger image, with more features enabled, runs 5fps slower than the iPhone version.
Again, where was I lying?
Ok, you got me, my mistake. I though the video was of the Zune, not some other device. The Tegra does indeed look impressive. I look forward to reading some reviews on the Zune soon, and the no doubt many, many comparisons.
Strange that they don't come with any software, so all the people who get them early, including reviewers, can't try it out. I have seen a few people wishing they could write about them.
Last edited by Calum on 15 Sep 2009 - 09:20
From what I have read, they are not allowing anyone to create apps for it, like Apple have. You have to be a big company. There is not going to be any open marketplace. Hopefully they change their minds.
found this quote:
"The Zune marketing manager was quoted in the Seattle Times on whether the Zune would open up for 3rd-party apps, and he gave a response of such mind-numbing PR-speak that John Gruber of Daring Fireball was moved to provide this English translation: "No, because our mobile strategy is a convoluted mess.""
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...73-0b7f83ef77f9
same as the ipod touch/iphone, there will be zune hd, zune phone.
same as the ipod touch/iphone, there will be zune hd, zune phone.
I expect them to do this as well, but I don't think they will drop Windows Mobile entirely. I think they will integrate a cleaner UI similar to Zune's into Windows Mobile. Microsoft does try pretty hard to not break applications developed for their platforms, so I don't expect them to scrap the old code entirely.
With that said, I am really looking forward to Microsoft updating their mobile OS'... Perhaps Project Pink?
same as the ipod touch/iphone, there will be zune hd, zune phone.
I expect them to do this as well, but I don't think they will drop Windows Mobile entirely. I think they will integrate a cleaner UI similar to Zune's into Windows Mobile. Microsoft does try pretty hard to not break applications developed for their platforms, so I don't expect them to scrap the old code entirely.
I think MS's plan is to eventually integrate Zune into their other products, including the Xbox, Windows Mobile, and even Windows itself (as much as anti-trust laws will allow them).
not to mention the Microsoft Zune HD fails in about every category. Did you read that Apple Insider article?
I actually spent some time reading the apple insider article. Most of it is based on little data drawing bigger conclusions. A little bit of this, a little bit of that...typical FUD. Nothing more.
1. Microsoft only demonstrates the Zune HD in the dark. Um, ok, except for all those videos from well-lit trade show floors.
2. Their complaint about the Tegra chip seems to be only backed up with information from an analyst in 2007 which turned out to be inaccurate.
3. Microsoft has always stated from the time they announced the device that HD video output would be via external display.
4. Nobody's ever said that the HD radio in the Zune HD is anything other than the HD radio the broadcasting industry has been promoting. It can, in fact, carry high-definition and 5.1 surround.
5. This is mostly opinion, and is related to #2, but Windows CE does apparently support multiple processors and the CE that's supposedly in the Zune is optimized as such. The Windows CE SDK is designed to allow you to customize it in great detail to the device you're building the package for.
You believe everything you read ha?
Why don't you use your own eyes and brain? Go to a bestbuy store and compare your itouch with zune, yourself!
This is free advice from an iphone 3gs owner!
I think the key words there are "Apple Insider article"... LOL I'd prefer to rely on entirely unbiased reviews of the product. Just as I wouldn't go to a Microsoft centric publication for a review of the iPod Touch, I would not go to an Apple centric publication for the Zune... To do so doesn't make any sense whatsoever to me...
It doesnt have to make sense...Sense has nothing to do with it :-)
You just have to believe it :-)
You just have to believe it :-)
hahaha, that made me chuckle... ;-)
You are completely mixed up. You should not trust Microsofts article about the Zune, nor Apple article about the iPod. You should read lots of sources, and claiming to skip the biased ones is a joke. There is a huge amount of bias here, just as there is at Apple insider. Your comments, for example, are always pro-Microsoft for some reason.
Yes, because when I think of unbiased analysis of a Microsoft product, I think Apple Insider.
I haven't either, but it uses WPF, so I'm assuming you can develop in .Net? I mean, it would only make sense for Microsoft to open the device up to this huge repository of developers and hobbyists... If this is the case, I expect the apps to add up rather quickly...
Now just to hope for a way to weed out the junk...
Now just to hope for a way to weed out the junk...
Sadly, this is not a true App Store yet. They said that they are not opening it for third party developers at this time. They are simply developing several high quality apps themselves for now. The reason given was that they don't want overlapping products and the Windows Mobile team is creating an App Marketplace. They are waiting to see if that will be viable for the Zune.
Now just to hope for a way to weed out the junk...
Sadly, this is not a true App Store yet. They said that they are not opening it for third party developers at this time. They are simply developing several high quality apps themselves for now. The reason given was that they don't want overlapping products and the Windows Mobile team is creating an App Marketplace. They are waiting to see if that will be viable for the Zune.
This is a huge mistake for Microsoft. Sure, Apple took a year to open an app store, but it was still the first. Microsoft has to compete with all the other app stores out there right now, as well as the king of them all.
All these devices, from palm, google phone, iphone are first released in the US, then the rest of the world. It will come, don't worry (unless it fails, which Microsoft wont allow. Expect to see lots of ads coming your way soon).
The real issue with taking the Zune HD international is the HD radio standard (which is different in Europe than here in the US) and the Zune Pass (which would require contract negotiations with European record labels. There are lots of little RIAAs everywhere).
Windows Mobile 7 will be based on the Zune HD OS
lol, yeah I wonder why the Zune HD says that?
Or, more likely, hello from Zadung City, China.
MS headquarters is located in Redmond, Washington, which is very near Seattle.
Overall I really like it and not even wondering if I made a questionable purchase.
I would highly recommend the Zune HD. But don't be surprised that its smaller than you expected but it feels right in your hands as well as its very very well constructed.
Overall I really like it and not even wondering if I made a questionable purchase.
I would highly recommend the Zune HD. But don't be surprised that its smaller than you expected but it feels right in your hands as well as its very very well constructed.
So you have an ipod Touch (you can't even get the name right), and you never though of playing movies on it? You know you can get apps for it, right?
I think he meant that he is happy he can A/V out to other HDTV's and Monitors.
I have played movies on the I-Touch(Ipod Touch). Thanks for the update on the movie playing bit. A/V out to HDTV does that not compute? I do not need to write a technical review as we all know that it outputs 720p to an HDTV. I like this feature and it worked very well so I commented on it.
Thanks for pointing things out to me. Now I can rest happily knowing this.
I have played movies on the I-Touch(Ipod Touch). Thanks for the update on the movie playing bit. A/V out to HDTV does that not compute? I do not need to write a technical review as we all know that it outputs 720p to an HDTV. I like this feature and it worked very well so I commented on it.
Thanks for pointing things out to me. Now I can rest happily knowing this.
yeah, just that your comment sounds like ad copy from Micrsoft Marketing department themselves. And how can you even write that you have never thought that it was a bad decision, surely you would have to think about it before you wrote that?
I am sure the Zune is a nice little machine, just don't need someone from Microsoft marketing coming in here telling us that. I will wait for the real reviews thanks.
Last edited by lordcanti86 on 16 Sep 2009 - 17:47
- The video playback is clean, crisp, and smooth
- HD 720P video output with the Dock
- The Web Browser is pretty decent. - Much better than the IE thats typically in Microsoft's Mobile devices like phones
- Audio Quality, imaging, and channel seperation is great.
- Browsing Audio/Video/Podcasts is very fluid and visual
- Some nice graphical effects when tracks play
- The HD Radio Quality is great and you can tag whats playing of course to download/search for later
- There is no physical button that I've found to turn the volume up or down but there is a dedicated button on the left side that pops open a touch interface to the volume that you can use from anywhere.
- They got rid of the stupid multiple button function to turn the device off there is a proper Power button right on the top of the device.
- Play games while listening to music
- Seems to be quite capable graphical wise ... Looking forward to seeing what Games developers put together for the device.
- Headphones included sound quality is good but its not the excellent squishy ones that the 80GB Zune originals had.
- Lighter, smaller, and thinner than I thought it would be.
- Has some what of a layered display. So on the left you can see whats currently playing, yours pins, history, and some other information and on the right there still is enough space for you to see and launch the main menu options without seeming cluttered.
Cons:
- It doesn't come with the excellent squishy headphones with the cloth wire that came with the Zune 80GB's
- Wireless signal isn't quite as good as I'd like. I found myself being connected sometimes but not able to successfully browse the internet
- Slim pickings for Apps at the moment - About 10 apps/games All by Microsoft
- Ad before launch of some apps. I haven't experienced this much some reported seeing ads for cars and such when launching the apps. All I have seen is an ad for Zune Pass that lasts about 2-3 seconds not too annoying.
- Strong smell of something in the packaging housing the headphones and sync cable ... It doesn't exactly stink but it smells chemical like. Like new car smell but a little worst. But some people love the new car smell
- there should be a 1 click URL clear button on the web browser interface. Instead it looks like you need to hold the backspace button for a few seconds. There might be something that does this but I haven't found it yet and maybe overlooking it.
- Screen kinda becomes almost invisible in certain sun light angles
- I keep finding myself swiping the area under the screen to the left/right to go back (like I do on the Palm Pre all the time) when you can't do that hehe. That part of the device isn't touch sensitive.You tap the arrow at the upper left of the screen or the enlarged text at the top of the screen to go back on any screen.
Not really a con but the feel of the touch screen felt funny to me initially in comparison to my other primary touch sensitive device the Palm Pre. But after about 2 minutes or so that feeling of oddness went away.
Don't have any hard details on battery life yet. Still draining it down from first full charge/sync.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.