Azureus Vuze 3.0.4.2

Advertisement (Why?)

Vuze is a next-generation online entertainment platform that gives you the ultimate entertainment experience, and access to a world of great high-res content you can view in DVD-quality and HD, right on your monitor or connected TV. Vuze is powered by Azureus technology, a safe and trusted peer-to-peer downloadable client.

What's New:

FEATURE: UI | Added "Check Files Exist" menu option [amc1]
FEATURE: Plug | Perform low resource usage tracking of online torrents for swarm cross-population purposes [Parg]
CHANGE: Core | Added option to disable download speed focus [The 8472]
CHANGE: Core | Reduced memory usage for many-torrent instances [The 8472]
CHANGE: UI | Multiple selected torrent export now works [amc1]
BUGFIX: Core | Fixed IP filters not working when ALLOW instead of DENY was used [Parg]
BUGFIX: Core | Improve rebuffering behaviour when real-time pieces are too slow for any peers to get in time [Parg]
BUGFIX: Core | Ensure minimum buffer requirements are factored into ETA calculation [Parg]
BUGFIX: UI | Eliminated various memory leaks [The 8472]

Download Azureus Vuze 3.0.4.2: Windows Version | Linux Version | Mac Version

View: On Vuze

Link: Home Page

(1 reply) #1 b.tarek.aziz on 23 Dec 2007 - 20:22

Utorrent is better of course.....Azureus uses too much resources, and it is based on JAVA!!!

#1.1 klavious on 23 Dec 2007 - 21:19

I actually prefer Halite over UT.

#2 linuxboynz on 23 Dec 2007 - 23:18

Azureus was good once, now there are just so many smaller, quicker less resource hungry clients out there.
utorrent FTW

Last edited by linuxboynz on 23 Dec 2007 - 23:19

(1 reply) #3 Beastage on 24 Dec 2007 - 00:24

utorrent and halite are not to be compared with Vuze

Vuze is a platform for distributing content via the BT protocol, utorrent and halite are just BT clients.

#3.1 rpger81 on 24 Dec 2007 - 00:53

Quote - (Beastage said @ #3)

You're distributing content on other BT clients using BT protocal too >.> You just don't have a stupid UI aka Vuze to bother you on those other clients.

#4 toadeater on 24 Dec 2007 - 02:16

This doesn't improve my swashbuckling capabilities.

#5 RADicaLMMS on 24 Dec 2007 - 03:24

I still like and use Azureus. All I know is, when I do a peer check on my transfers I see Azureus dominating.

Heck if people continue to use Firefox with its memory issues, this is no different, funny thing I use Opera full time. Man I'm a real outcast!

#6 Helba on 24 Dec 2007 - 05:33

I like Azureus a lot.

I hate Vuze though. The Azureus 2.x clients are where it's at.

#7 EnzoFX on 26 Dec 2007 - 02:41

vuze is like a media player/p2p/ and can stream crap. Disgusting.

#8 Xiphan on 08 Jan 2008 - 23:57

Well for the time being I'm impressed with the fact that Azureus has managed to connect to more peers than µTorrent can, I need speed over system resources and considering I like to download Trailers too (especially HD ones) the content offered through Vuze is most welcome!

What I don't like about µTorrent is when my downloads reach 99.8% and µTorrent thereafter fails to connect to the seeders anymore!

#9 gaLvonic on 08 Apr 2008 - 22:11

"b.tarek.aziz"

Azureus uses too much resources

"linuxboynz"

less resource hungry clients out there.

Sounds like someone didn't bother READING how to properly configure the application for his system

and it is based on JAVA!!!

What are your COGENT reasons for disapproving of Java?

No problems here

vs the most popular downloaded web browser

Azu, even Vuze, is delightful when properly CONFIGURED.

it can even be configured to look oldschool

Plus I don't have to tolerate crap clients or barely-sharing peers with azu...ÂµTorrent only has IPA banning.

Last edited by gaLvonic on 08 Apr 2008 - 22:37

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Neowin.net