Recommended Posts

Title says it all. :)

7106.0.090408-1623_x64fre_client_zh-cn_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULXFRER_CN_DVD

7106.0.090408-1623_x86fre_client_zh-cn_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULFRER_CN_DVD

stupid. Yes im going to complain. for the majority of us this does us no good. might as well have not wasted their time.

thats why people should wait for the rc ;)

Meh, each build I've installed has had some annoying bug that has made me fiend for a new build like crack. :p

revreddy: don't most of the winmain builds with the full build string in the watermark say "For testing purposes only" instead of "Evaluation copy"?

Ah hell, ANOTHER one? Seems like I'm spending more time installing new builds and tweaking things again afterwards than actually using the damn thing!

That is the reason why I am still using 7068 and decided to skip 7077. It's too much work to reinstall all my applications.

I don't know. It's not my screen.

Just a suspicion. If the watermark was changed for 7077, then I was suspecting they would also keep it the same way for the RC instead of the full internal string. On the other hand, this could confirm 7105 might be RC and 7106 is a newer internal post-RC build. Who knows. Let's just hope this thing leaks by the time I wake up in the morning.

I'm not validating the authenticity of the leaks, but something about the buildstring.

Build 7077 is from the RC branch and as such has an evaluation copy tag. Build 7106 is still part of winmain (because it will go on to be RTM) and therefore does not have the new buildstring

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.