Recommended Posts

  Quote
And now we come to it. On Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the following Tuesday. Like I said before, there are a legion of horrible and just plain evil aspects to this bill and I?m sure you?ve heard a lot them by now. I don?t want to discount them but what cannot be missed here is this new law now opens a prophetic door on a magnitude not seen since the reformation of Israel.

This new law requires an RFID chip implanted in all of us. This chip will not only contain your personal information with tracking capability but it will also be linked to your bank account. And get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip), reads, and I quote: "Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment". It is now the law of the land that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin and this chip will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our personal records and tracking capability built into it.

In just a minute I?m going to show you the black and white of the law itself and you can see it with your own eyes and wonder why an event of this magnitude which is nothing less than seismic in nature is met with little more than silence in the Christian community.

Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy? I?ll ask that question again in a minute and follow up on it, but now I want to show you the law itself. I?ve downloaded a PDF copy of HR3200 from the government's website so what I?m about to show you is from the bill itself its nothing that I?ve written. You can access it all and see it all for yourself straight from the source itself.

H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1.

The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ?registry?) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that? ??is or has been used in or on a patient; ??and is? ??a class III device; or ??a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.?

More @ : PatriotActionNetwork

And when people fight back against this. Those FEMA camps will open their doors and harbor those who resist. :blink:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1000426-rfid-chips-for-all-by-2013/
Share on other sites

  On 26/05/2011 at 20:24, iamawesomewicked said:

YAY, more bull**** posted by you.. Thankfully in the right forum though.

Here is page 1000/1001/1002 of HR3200

Your source claims Page 1001, Paragraph 1 has the information on RFID's... but it does not.

might not mention RFID's does say Class III and Class II implantable.

Don't hate.

  On 26/05/2011 at 20:56, presence06 said:

might not mention RFID's does say Class III and Class II implantable.

Don't hate.

It doesn't say anything about everyone requiring it by March 2013. It doesn't even say it's required.

I think it's about medical implanted chips.

  On 26/05/2011 at 20:56, presence06 said:

might not mention RFID's does say Class III and Class II implantable.

Don't hate.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/microchip.asp

  Quote
First off, the page numbers and language referenced in the example above did not come from HR 3590 the version of the health care bill actually passed by Congress (nor in any of the reconciliation bills passed afterwards). They were taken from HR 3200, an earlier, House version of health care reform legislation that was never passed by Congress. Therefore, passages cited from HR 3200 are irrelevant, as that bill was never signed into law.

Second, even the now-irrelevant language of the unpassed HR 3200 (and similar language in the passed bill, HR 3590 did not mandate that anyone be implanted with any type of microchip or device, for any reason. The passages quoted above reference a section which simply calls for the creation of a registry that would allow the Department of Health and Human Services to collect data about medical devices "used in or on a patient" — including devices which patients consent to have implanted in them during surgery, such as pacemakers — for purposes such as tracking the effectiveness of such devices and facilitating the distribution of manufacturer recall notices.

/Thread

  On 26/05/2011 at 22:38, presence06 said:

What do you want? To hear that you're right?

Fine - Maybe this wasn't actually signed in. This could have been a previous version.

There. Happy now?

LOL you mad bro? jk

Honestly it helps to research these things first instead of blindly following conspiracy sites. The problem is, HR 3590 was signed back in March of 2010, this article came out in Jan of 2011. Its clear the writer didnt do their homework.

  On 27/05/2011 at 23:05, TheNay said:

If you have a passport you're tracked easily.. they all have RFIDs in them in USA, most of EU, and next year Canada...

If by "tracked" you mean "they'll be able to determine whether you have entered or exited your country like they could prior to RFID" then yes. Otherwise, no. First, it's a document you don't carry around on a daily basis so if they were "tracking" you it'd look like you were stationary for the majority of the year (provided you don't travel out of country much). Second, it can only be scanned from fifteen or less feet away making it an ineffective "tracking" device.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.