Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

By Yusuf M.
in Gamers' Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

trag3dy

Posted
Posted

sounds like a better "PC" game then bf3 is bragging they got :)

Sounds to me like they're trying to have a **** measuring contest. Notice how the article specifically talks about how the pc version will supposedly have all the features that are "missing" from BF3? Considering BC2 now is nothing like BC2 was when it first launched, I don't think it's a fair comparison to well..compare them at all, at this point.

Edit: I actually had to self censor, lol

Grand Master

rajputwarrior

Posted
Posted

BF3 is the future for now.

like show that **** cd is the figure of rap music? if that's the case, you guys can have it.

Sounds to me like they're trying to have a **** measuring contest. Notice how the article specifically talks about how the pc version will supposedly have all the features that are "missing" from BF3? Considering BC2 now is nothing like BC2 was when it first launched, I don't think it's a fair comparison to well..compare them at all, at this point.

Edit: I actually had to self censor, lol

all you can do is compare of what out there. BF3 devloppers are the immature ones saying how COD is **** and talking about how they are going to own them in sales... if anything, this ****ing contest was started by DICE by talking crap as where the activision guys are trying to win it by talking about themselves.

Veteran

BoneyardBrew Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

This game has been hiding behind it's name. I am unimpressed. WHERE IS THE GAMEPLAY?!?!

Hiding.

The gameplay? Just check the trailers for Modern Warfare 1, 2, and Black Ops and you'll see the gameplay. It's exactly the same! Yay, how original!

Veteran

BoneyardBrew Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

i like the gamplay. why fix what isn't broke? and besides, can't judge it until you have played it...

just fix the balancing, it was terrible in black ops...

Oh, but I've played it several times already. Why fix what isn't broke? Well...charging me $60 for the same game over and over isn't exactly nice, now is it?

I thought Black Ops was far better than Modern Warfare 2, at least in the multiplayer department. At least they gave us dedicated servers...

Grand Master

rajputwarrior

Posted
Posted

Oh, but I've played it several times already. Why fix what isn't broke? Well...charging me $60 for the same game over and over isn't exactly nice, now is it?

I thought Black Ops was far better than Modern Warfare 2, at least in the multiplayer department. At least they gave us dedicated servers...

that is true. and yeah 60 bucks a year sucks but i do it every year with sports game so meh. sports game rarely change drastically year after year, but they usually do enough for me to get a retarded amount of hours out of it playing with friends. same with CoD and bf3 whenever it comes to steam when i pick it up. not saying i'm not going to buy BF3, just not yet.

We're talking single player here. At least that's what I thought.

well unless someone has some thoughts on the SP for CoD, i'll take what the members say around here that's it buggy and has terrible AI (like bc2 did...). those aren't judgements, those are facts that no one can deny. you can't have an opinion on crashing, it what it does. you can't have an opinion of dumb AI, dumb AI is dumb AI...

Veteran

BoneyardBrew Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

that is true. and yeah 60 bucks a year sucks but i do it every year with sports game so meh. sports game rarely change drastically year after year, but they usually do enough for me to get a retarded amount of hours out of it playing with friends. same with CoD and bf3 whenever it comes to steam when i pick it up. not saying i'm not going to buy BF3, just not yet.

That's fine by me if you feel it's worth purchasing. That's what it comes down to...spending your money on something you enjoy.

The only reason I said something in the first place is because some of your posts came off as attacks towards BF3 and praise towards MW3 in the inappropriate thread (CoD praise in the BF3 thread, and vice versa).

Grand Master

trag3dy

Posted
Posted

that is true. and yeah 60 bucks a year sucks but i do it every year with sports game so meh. sports game rarely change drastically year after year, but they usually do enough for me to get a retarded amount of hours out of it playing with friends. same with CoD and bf3 whenever it comes to steam when i pick it up. not saying i'm not going to buy BF3, just not yet.

well unless someone has some thoughts on the SP for CoD, i'll take what the members say around here that's it buggy and has terrible AI (like bc2 did...). those aren't judgements, those are facts that no one can deny. you can't have an opinion on crashing, it what it does. you can't have an opinion of dumb AI, dumb AI is dumb AI...

Are you sure the guys who are giving their opinion on those things are playing a legit version of the game? To be playing a legit version of the game the store they bought it from would have had to break street date by 3 or 4 days and I don't see that happening.

I'm more interested in how those people got to play the game so many days in advance than in what they're saying about the game. Not that we can talk about that, so I don't ask.

Grand Master

rajputwarrior

Posted
Posted

That's fine by me if you feel it's worth purchasing. That's what it comes down to...spending your money on something you enjoy.

The only reason I said something in the first place is because some of your posts came off as attacks towards BF3 and praise towards MW3 in the inappropriate thread (CoD praise in the BF3 thread, and vice versa).

i just hate it when douchebags talk crap (EA/DICE) about the competition/leaders (activision) and never ever back it up.

Are you sure the guys who are giving their opinion on those things are playing a legit version of the game? To be playing a legit version of the game the store they bought it from would have had to break street date by 3 or 4 days and I don't see that happening.

I'm more interested in how those people got to play the game so many days in advance than in what they're saying about the game. Not that we can talk about that, so I don't ask.

it's leaked for 360... the leak for 360 is the same version people will be buying. so yes, i am sure they are cause i know the retail for 360 has leaked. and yeah, we can talk about leaked games...

Veteran

BoneyardBrew Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

i just hate it when douchebags talk crap (EA/DICE) about the competition/leaders (activision) and never ever back it up.

it's leaked for 360... the leak for 360 is the same version people will be buying. so yes, i am sure they are cause i know the retail for 360 has leaked. and yeah, we can talk about leaked games...

I can't comment on any of this because I'm not familiar with what happened. I didn't start following either game until around the time the BF3 Beta started.

Grand Master

rajputwarrior

Posted
Posted

I can't comment on any of this because I'm not familiar with what happened. I didn't start following either game until around the time the BF3 Beta started.

last two DICE games EA/DICE have been talking about how they are going to dethrone CoD as the king of online FPS (did it with BC2 and MoH) and failed miserably at it. and they have continued to do it with this game.

Grand Master

trag3dy

Posted
Posted

I can't comment on any of this because I'm not familiar with what happened. I didn't start following either game until around the time the BF3 Beta started.

It's all completely irrelevant really. My main thing was that I was questioning why we were discussing the single player so...passionately....when we all know that's not why we buy these games. At least not the main reason. (for most people)

Veteran

BoneyardBrew Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

last two DICE games EA/DICE have been talking about how they are going to dethrone CoD as the king of online FPS (did it with BC2 and MoH) and failed miserably at it. and they have continued to do it with this game.

I don't like that anyone talks dirty about the competition. The game should be doing the talking. BC2 started off rough but ended up a pretty great game, MoH sucked.

It's all completely irrelevant really. My main thing was that I was questioning why we were discussing the single player so...passionately....when we all know that's not why we buy these games. At least not the main reason. (for most people)

I get that. Not many singleplayer campaigns really have that "wow" factor anymore, and the Battlefield series was never known for it.

Grand Master

rajputwarrior

Posted
Posted

It's all completely irrelevant really. My main thing was that I was questioning why we were discussing the single player so...passionately....when we all know that's not why we buy these games. At least not the main reason. (for most people)

why? if it was the opposite situation bf3 fanboys would be saying the same thing about activision acting like a bunch of butthurt babies... but it's the opposite that's going on.

Grand Master

trag3dy

Posted
Posted

last two DICE games EA/DICE have been talking about how they are going to dethrone CoD as the king of online FPS (did it with BC2 and MoH) and failed miserably at it. and they have continued to do it with this game.

To be fair DICE is only responsible for half of MoH. Also to be fair, that half was still bad. :rofl:

why? if it was the opposite situation bf3 fanboys would be saying the same thing about activision acting like a bunch of butthurt babies... but it's the opposite that's going on.

Because until BF3 (most don't consider BC2 a true battlefield game) the battlefield series never had a single player.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing