windows 8 Microsoft Drops Aero from Windows 8

[Luis Mazza]

That looks nothing like Windows 8.

How dare you? Can't you see all of the white and dual colors? Can't you see plain text and colors?

What exactly does not resemble Windows 8's desktop?

[George P Global Moderator]

That Sinofsky quote brings up an interesting fact, he's a die-hard kb user who loves kb shortcuts. He's said this back when the DP was released on stage, and to that extent Win8 is packed with KB shortcuts, even more of them than Win7. Every element in Windows Explorer, and it's ribbon now have a kb shortcut. Plus it's easier to learn because you get hints once you press ctrl right on the ribbon.

You can, within a short bit of time, learn to use the whole OS, even the start screen, with just your kb and never have to use touch or a mouse. I think this fact is telling to all those who argue that this is just for touch and so on. I also think it's telling that other OSs and desktop environments are also taking the same approach but still using static icons instead of live tiles. OSX Line tosses up a full screen grid of icons in it's new launcher now, GNOME3 does the same thing as well, while heavily backing search as a way to find and start apps instead of digging through a menu. Say what you will but from what I've seen everyone is going in this general direction. Though Win8 is just the first step I expect that come Win9 the desktop and start screen will match fully and we'll also be able to toss metro apps over into the desktop instead of having them limited to full screen. WinRT as an API/Platform isn't ready for that yet so how it's used in the OS is walled off for now.

[HawkMan]

Windows 8 is very similar to Windows 3.1.

I'm sure that OS is going to be huge...

Sounds simple to you, guys?

LOL

Exactly how is it AT ALL similar? You don't sound like you've used either OS. And if you think the screenshots are similar, you're also blind. They're about as similar as driving an old steam powered car and driving a modern automatic.

[MorganX]

RE Touch on destktops: not viable for what will now go back to being called "workstation" users. For the AIO in the kitchen running a cookbook app while soccer mom "glances" at email and facebook it will be great. They will be much more productive than they are now and it will be easier for them. There are millions.

For "workstation" users, it's a nuisance on the desktop which could be avoided by making it possible to boot to the desktop. Those using a workstation, rarely or never, "glance" at the start menu for anything.

[Luis Mazza]

That looks nothing like the Metro experience.

Can't you see the tiles? Everything is super square.

Don't fool yourself because of some fast animations. It actually turns the experience too fast and cluttered for old ladies and gentlemen.

Simple is better :woot:

[Luis Mazza]

Exactly how is it AT ALL similar? You don't sound like you've used either OS. And if you think the screenshots are similar, you're also blind. They're about as similar as driving an old steam powered car and driving a modern automatic.

There comes the lovely "I love everything, really-you don't know, because you don't agree with mel" sir.

[Active.]

That looks nothing like the Metro experience.

Right. Because it's impossible to have three Metro-style apps visible at the same time... :shifty: (scnr)

[Stoffel]

The desktop is still more or less the same, you don't have to learn anything new on that end, so the majority of people will use it like they used Win7. The start screen isn't at all complex, just tell them about the hot corners and what they do and the difference between metro and classic desktop apps and done. How is this really that hard? And besides that, have the millions out there who own a iPad run out and gotten training on using the UI? What about when they buy a smartphone for the first time with all the different UIs out there? I really doubt it, why should the PC be any different? Win8 will have a tutorial and or a getting started guide, people will just read it like they do for all the other devices they buy and have to learn, and in the end they'll learn it without issue.

Totally agree with you, I've been saying this myself for the last few months.

If they all can learn how to use a smartphone or a tablet, how hard can it be to adjust to a slightly different Windows

[Calum Veteran]

Right. Because it's impossible to have three Metro-style apps visible at the same time... :shifty: (scnr)

Haha, good one (Y) :D

[Active.]

But, again, on topic: I think the screenshot looks great. And I especially like the fact that Microsoft is making sensible default choices so that the product looks great out of the box, and not just after you've spent time customizing it to your liking.

The default window chrome is white, creating an airy and premium look. The taskbar continues to blend into the desktop wallpaper, but appears less complicated overall.

I mean, seriously, compare it to what Vista looked like out of the box (and that's without the Gadget side bar):

What an absolute visual mess.

EDIT: And say what you will about the removal of the Start button, but the task bar looks much better and cleaner without the Windows Start orb in the corner. :)

Edited May 21, 2012 by CJEric

[Guest Sasa_RI]

Ugly tablet/phone OS

[Zain Adeel]

whatevs!.. metro is here to stay! and its for the good!

[Nashy]

Then stick with what u have. Simple. Leads me to believe that you are a teenie bopper who just doesn't get it.

Lol. a 26 year old teenie bopper.

[Order_66]

But, again, on topic: I think the screenshot looks great. And I especially like the fact that Microsoft is making sensible default choices so that the product looks great out of the box, and not just after you've spent time customizing it to your liking.

What an absolute visual mess.

And say what you will about the removal of the Start button, but the task bar looks much better and cleaner without the Windows Start orb in the corner. :)

I don't know, I never liked vista at all personally but those shots that you posted show vista as the clear winner both in looks and functionality, I almost hate to tell you but if you're campaigning for windows 8 it looks like you just shot yourself in the foot.

[Rudy]

I never liked Aero so I see this as a move in the right direction

[Highlander77]

But, again, on topic: I think the screenshot looks great. And I especially like the fact that Microsoft is making sensible default choices so that the product looks great out of the box, and not just after you've spent time customizing it to your liking.

I mean, seriously, compare it to what Vista looked like out of the box (and that's without the Gadget side bar):

What an absolute visual mess.

EDIT: And say what you will about the removal of the Start button, but the task bar looks much better and cleaner without the Windows Start orb in the corner. :)

Windows Vista UI looks beatiful. Looks better than Windows 7 but that's a personal choice. New Windows 8 Desktop UI looks flat, kind of empty but again looks professional somewhat.

[DrEmmettLBrown]

Aero was fine in Vista, and worked great on an old Athlon XP 2500 I had.

Anyhow, the geeks like me like Win8. The non-geeks around me figured it out in about 30 minutes, without a training video.

And, that you don't know XP is not the dominant version of Windows speaks volumes of what you really know.

I think he was right (as of March 1), perhaps that you don't know that it *is* speaks volumes...

XP loses ground to Windows 7 but still top OS

[DrEmmettLBrown]

Windows 7 is the number 1# OS atm

Sorry, but it is still XP (as of March 1)! Inconvenient as that may be for your argument!

XP Loses Ground to Windows 7 But is Still Top OS

[HawkMan]

Sorry, but it is still XP (as of March 1)! Inconvenient as that may be for your argument!

XP Loses Ground to Windows 7 But is Still Top OS

No. and it hasn't been for a very long time.

http://en.wikipedia....erating_systems

Can we start ignoring Net market shares artificially bloated fake stats already. when every other stat counter disagree with them , they're obviously wrong. they're a little better than they used to be, they used to be 10% higher than the next service. now the next service is 3-4% away, but they're still 10% higher than the median.

[Yusuf M. Veteran]

Cleaned

[赛博朋克]

??? Have a reading comprehension problem? Go back to pre-school. I didn't say removing transparency improves battery life. The removal of glass, transparencies, gradients and eye candy etc is being justified by some here as the factors affecting battery life so I said even if that were true (MS doesn't say anything on their B8 blog about it but the glass affecting battery life topic was discussed ages ago: http://windowsteambl...ttery-life.aspx), powered-devices should have been able to enjoy Aero glass. They are just removing the glass to match Metro.

Oh FFS, stop whining about Aero glass. You've had it for 6 years. Times change. If you like it so much, I'm sure DeviantArt will have plenty of Aero glass themes for Windows 8.

[.Neo]

Right. Because it's impossible to have three Metro-style apps visible at the same time... :shifty: (scnr)

:laugh:

[Dot Matrix]

Sorry, but it is still XP (as of March 1)! Inconvenient as that may be for your argument!

XP Loses Ground to Windows 7 But is Still Top OS

Stat Counter says you're way off.

[LittleNeutrino Veteran]

Do not Misunderstand me, I like what the screen shots look like, however, i am willing to give up a bit of my processing power(as i have for years now) to have the Aero Clear theme. Simply because I like it. I think it looks cool.

[neufuse Veteran]

I always hated aero glass, the whole idea every chrome is transparent just felt weird... looks like MS finally realized this, but now they made windows ultrabright... go from one eye strainer to another...

what's next, they realize the blank titlebar in most windows is a waste of space? and finally move the breadcrum into that space? *gasp*

I always had the feeling aero glass and all the shaddows where just there to say hey look what we can do with DWM and WDDM!