Mystic Mungis Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 They should just have went on Judge Judy, she'd have it sorted out by now :p Hendrick and remixedcat 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dot Matrix Posted August 24, 2012 Author Share Posted August 24, 2012 No, no, THIS! javagreen and Phouchg 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 They should just have went on Judge Judy, she'd have it sorted out by now :p And both sides would have received $5,000! What a deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nogib Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 sadly, which is soo stupid, Apple is getting WAY TOO anti-competitive. whatever happened to breaking up overly large companies? it happened to Microsoft at one point, why is it that Apple seems to be immune from this? Yeah, I guess because the hipsters all blindly love Apple so much they get a pass? MS got bitch-slapped for WAAAY less ffs. javagreen 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystic Mungis Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Ohh here comes the jury, can't be long now! efjay 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dot Matrix Posted August 24, 2012 Author Share Posted August 24, 2012 This seems to be it, standby.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
techbeck Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 any second now.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dot Matrix Posted August 24, 2012 Author Share Posted August 24, 2012 Ed Bott (Via Twitter) is reporting the Apple Store is down... djdanster 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
techbeck Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Apples claims first. Dont think this will be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee G. Veteran Posted August 24, 2012 Veteran Share Posted August 24, 2012 (edited) For each of the following products did Samsung (SEC, SEA, STA) infringe claim 19 of /301 patent Answer for all devices is YES Edited August 24, 2012 by lcg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dot Matrix Posted August 24, 2012 Author Share Posted August 24, 2012 For each of the following products did Samsung (SEC, SEA, STA) infringe claim 19 of /301 patent Answer for all devices is YES for SEA, Galaxy Tab Wifi STA yes for Captivate Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit 4G, Galasy Ace, Prevail, S 4G, S II, Galaxy Tab, The Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerie, Nexus S 4G, Replenish and Vibrant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nominak Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Wow.. That's a massive hit on Samsung Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahhell Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Answer for all devices is YES On that one particular patent. It's still a giant pile of monkey****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julius Caro Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Answer for all devices is YES that was for that specific question. but this isnt looking good anyway hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dot Matrix Posted August 24, 2012 Author Share Posted August 24, 2012 Question Two. Claim 8 of 915 patent For SEC Captivate, continuum, droid charge, fascinate, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy S II, i9100, Galaxy s 2 Tmobile, Tab, Tab 10.1, Gem, Indulge, Infuse, Nexus S 4G, all yes No on Ace Intercept and Replenish For SEA: Yes on Galaxy Tab 10.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
episode Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 In short - Samsung is ****ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livin in a box Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 I wasn't expecting this...Samsung is up s**t creek without a paddle here D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dot Matrix Posted August 24, 2012 Author Share Posted August 24, 2012 Ed Bott (Via Twitter) is reporting the Apple Store is down... Ugh. He was joking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warboy Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 This is crappy. Move to mistrial lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
episode Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 I wasn't expecting this...Samsung is up s**t creek without a paddle here D: Why? It was quite obvious they took a lot of influence from Apple's designs. Those designs were patented. Thus, they lose on those counts. The devices that look different are the ones getting the 'No' decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julius Caro Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 DAMN at those list of hideous phone names. captivate? mesmerize? continuum? WHO came up with thesE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remixedcat Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Grrrr... she should throw out both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahhell Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 It's already on the front page of Neowin ("Apple wins) and they haven't finished reading the ****ing thing yet. Pathetic. javagreen 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttus Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 wouldn't '381, '163, and '915 be just part of the OS, not really samsung's thing? or is that only on samsung android phones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystic Mungis Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Dashel, javagreen and Dot Matrix 3 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts