Hum Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 Kodak said Friday that it plans to stop selling consumer inkjet printers and will eliminate 200 more jobs than previously projected as it requested more time to submit its framework for emerging from bankruptcy protection. The Rochester, New York-based company, which filed for bankruptcy protection in January, wants the court to extend the exclusivity period for the filing of its plan until Feb. 28. After the exclusivity period expires, creditors may file competing plans. In the months since its filing, Eastman Kodak Co. has worked to reshape itself, selling off businesses, eliminating jobs and slashing other costs, with the goal of emerging from court protection in 2013. Kodak said earlier this year that it would stop making digital cameras, pocket video cameras and digital picture frames. Earlier this year, it sold Kodak Gallery, its online photo service business, to Shutterfly Inc. for $23.8 million. Kodak was founded in 1880, and it introduced the iconic Brownie camera in 1900, making hobby photography affordable for many people. Its Kodachrome film, introduced in 1935, became the first commercially successful amateur color film. more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remixedcat Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 time to find a canon for this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Growled Member Posted September 29, 2012 Member Share Posted September 29, 2012 Probably for the best since no one bought them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloatingFatMan Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 So... As they no longer make digital camera's, pictures frames, pocket video cameras and now consumer inkjet printers... What the hell do they still make!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnelsoninjax Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 I bought a Kodak inkjet, and overall I have been happy with it, it is wireless and my only complaint with it is that when the color runs out, it refuses to print regardless if the document is in black ink... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nashy Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 Kodak made printers? If it's anything like their cameras, they would have been cheap, tacky, junk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
togermano Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 I almost bought one awhile back because their ink is cheaper then other companys..... Glad I didnt now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiagosilva29 Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 What the hell do they still make!?Moments. Glassed Silver, remixedcat and Sadelwo 3 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hum Posted September 29, 2012 Author Share Posted September 29, 2012 So... As they no longer make digital camera's, pictures frames, pocket video cameras and now consumer inkjet printers... What the hell do they still make!? Kodak made history -- what more do you want ? :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Warwagon MVC Posted September 29, 2012 MVC Share Posted September 29, 2012 I still can't believe people still buy ink jets. Laser FTW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PNWDweller Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 Probably for the best since no one bought them. I bought one because the ink was cheaper, but trying to find it locally now is a bear. I now know why. The quality of prints was VERY good. I still can't believe people still buy ink jets. Laser FTW! I have to buy inkjet, because quite simply a Laser is out of my price range, so...um...yeah...inkjet until I can afford to put some money into the printer and moreover the toner (especially color). Yes, you can get more prints with toner, but the initial cost is still pretty high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Warwagon MVC Posted September 29, 2012 MVC Share Posted September 29, 2012 I have to buy inkjet, because quite simply a Laser is out of my price range, so...um...yeah...inkjet until I can afford to put some money into the printer and moreover the toner (especially color). Yes, you can get more prints with toner, but the initial cost is still pretty high. You can buy $100 hp laserjets. Toner is like $50 but it prints a kazillion pages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisj1968 Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 You can buy $100 hp laserjets. Toner is like $50 but it prints a kazillion pages. kazillion? :p I'm messin with you.but you're right, i need to look into one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PNWDweller Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 TBH - I don't have $100 to put toward a Laserjet and won't for a while so until then... :) Work with them daily at work so know their power and quality for sure. (Laser Printers). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spy beef Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 And this is why I work at Oc? and not at Kodak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Warwagon MVC Posted September 29, 2012 MVC Share Posted September 29, 2012 TBH - I don't have $100 to put toward a Laserjet and won't for a while so until then... :) Work with them daily at work so know their power and quality for sure. (Laser Printers). So you buy a $30 ink jnk jet and spend $50 on refills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PNWDweller Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 So you buy a $30 ink jnk jet and spend $50 on refills. Not as often as you might think. We use our printer maybe once a month or in spurts. Our ink usually dries up before we have to go out and buy ink which is maybe once a year. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Gibs Posted September 29, 2012 Share Posted September 29, 2012 So you buy a $30 ink jnk jet and spend $50 on refills. $50 on refills? What? Costco (as well as other places) do refills for under $10. All you have to do is take your ink cartridge in and wait an hour and they'll give it back to you full of ink. http://www.costcoinkjetrefill.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorbing Posted November 12, 2012 Share Posted November 12, 2012 This is really sad news as I just bought a Kodak printer not long ago. Once it dies I will be stuck with a more expensive alternative from HP, Canon or even worst, Lexmark. Great. That's just great. If they are no longer making printers and just ink like this article says: http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/printing/3401145/kodak-to-stop-making-and-selling-printers/ Then we are all basically screwed because printers don't last forever and eventually all Kodak printers will cease to exist so guess what? No more inks. They will have no more reason to make inks for it. Wonderful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Growled Member Posted November 12, 2012 Member Share Posted November 12, 2012 What's wrong with HP? I've had good luck out of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lnmnky Posted November 12, 2012 Share Posted November 12, 2012 Do inks have an expiry if left sealed? Just bought a Kodak the other month, so might have to stock up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abandonedaccount Posted November 12, 2012 Share Posted November 12, 2012 Kodak made printers????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted November 12, 2012 Share Posted November 12, 2012 the problem with laser printers is the low 600x600dpi. The 2400x600dpi ones cost a lot more! You have to spend ?80 ish for a printer that can print at that resolution. Inkjets can be had for ?25 ish and cheap 3rd party ink cartridges for ?3 ish. I realise if you wanted to print thousands of pages a laser printer would be cheaper in the long term but a lot of people don't print much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorbing Posted November 12, 2012 Share Posted November 12, 2012 What's wrong with HP? I've had good luck out of them. Nothing wrong with HP printers. The problem is the cost of the ink. Kodak inks have always been the cheapest on the market. HP, Lexmark, Canon and Epson are very expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts