Recommended Posts

Terminator 2 ended perfectly, they should have left it alone instead of milking it.

I disagree, as if one followed time as linear, the destruction of the t1000 and cyberdyne, therefore preventing the birth of the ai called skynet, would then also then result in there being no time displacement equipment, thus restoring everyone killed in the first terminator by a terminator, not to mention kyle would not have gone back in time to get sarah connor pregnant.

Best case scenario, they would be stuck in a time loop.

  • Like 1

I disagree, as if one followed time as linear, the destruction of the t1000 and cyberdyne, therefore preventing the birth of the ai called skynet, would then also then result in there being no time displacement equipment, thus restoring everyone killed in the first terminator by a terminator, not to mention kyle would not have gone back in time to get sarah connor pregnant.

Best case scenario, they would be stuck in a time loop.

Never thought about it that way!

 

I need to rewatch T1 and T2.

A sad part on the use of my free time, I tried to study temperal physics

Failed miserably, but the example given was following time as a linear event

it's never to late.

 

My mum graduated from business admin at 46 an uncle I had at 48 from diploamtic something.

  • Like 1

A sad part on the use of my free time, I tried to study temperal physics

Failed miserably, but the example given was following time as a linear event

It could encompass parallel time lines [i.e. key decisions you make create a separate time line] punching through and intersecting with one another

  • 3 weeks later...

New trailer for the movie. FAIR WARNING: IT GIVES A LOT AWAY. There are certain things it shows I would consider major spoilers but I admit I haven't been paying a lot of attention to this movie so they might be common knowledge. These things haven't been shown in other trailers as far as I know. I wish I had not watched it.

 

http://youtu.be/jNU_jrPxs-0

 

Not sure why it's not embedding properly but that works out because the thumbnail for the video is a spoiler too.

Her hand is backward on the skull because she's facing toward the sun in the picture which means her hand is facing toward to you.  Look at the fingers carefully. 

 

Maybe her arm got twisted in the movie... who knows.

 

 

:huh:

 

It looks to me like her thumb is on the right next to her leg. It still looks awkward though.

New trailer for the movie. FAIR WARNING: IT GIVES A LOT AWAY. There are certain things it shows I would consider major spoilers but I admit I haven't been paying a lot of attention to this movie so they might be common knowledge. These things haven't been shown in other trailers as far as I know. I wish I had not watched it.

 

http://youtu.be/jNU_jrPxs-0

 

Not sure why it's not embedding properly but that works out because the thumbnail for the video is a spoiler too.

 

Gotta laugh at the top YT comment there...

 

"Remember when Arnold got that mini gun and Shot at the police from the Cyberdyne systems building and after then Miles Dyson dies that awesome death. That was good times not this time travel ****."

 

That's clearly a guy who never understood the first films then :p

  • Like 1

I will see it, because I have this horrible streak that says "Maybe this one will be good, maybe they won't fudge up a story that really should be able to write itself".  Same with Superman and other franchises - I fail to see how so many people can write bad films, when there's such a wealth of great material to work from.

 

I personally loved SOME PARTS of Salvation and Sarah Connor Chronicles - heck, the last 5 minutes of Rise Of The Machines was epic to my mind.  Sure, they were flawed, but some of the ideas - it made that hopeful side of me think "Someone somewhere pitched a great idea, and then Hollywood overthought it and messed it up".

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.