Recommended Posts

During the terminal count engineers observed drift on one of the two thrust vector actuators on the second stage that would likely have caused an automatic abort. Engineers called a hold in order to take a closer look. SpaceX is scrubbed for today and we are now targeting launch on Jan. 9th at 5:09am ET.

Translation: most likely during 2nd stage engine chill-down (liquid oxygen run through the turbopump to prepare for ignition) the actuators that the steer the engine are tested. A sensor reported one didn't move as expected - it's center point position drifted out of spec.

In other words; the upper stage's power steering went out, or a sensor failure made it look like it did.

Since the launch window was <1 second long they couldn't stop to check it out or replace it and try again later today, so they moved it to the backup date of Friday. Meanwhile they'll check the actuator and sensors.

Translation: most likely during 2nd stage engine chill-down (liquid oxygen run through the turbopump to prepare for ignition) the actuators that the steer the engine are tested. A sensor reported one didn't move as expected - it's center point position drifted out of spec.

In other words; the upper stage's power steering went out, or a sensor failure made it look like it did.

Since the launch window was <1 second long they couldn't stop to check it out or replace it and try again later today, so they moved it to the backup date of Friday. Meanwhile they'll check the actuator and sensors.

Are these sensors pretty flimsy or something?  Seems like they go bad all the time.

We don't know if it was a sensor, an actuator or even a hydraulic problem yet.

As to a flimsy sensor, it happens. Same as valve or actuator issues. See Delta IV Heavy during the Orion test when they didn't know if the scrub was caused by sticking valves (a perennial problem on Delta IV) or bad sensor readings. ULA, SpaceX, Aerojet-Rocketdyne etc. get these parts from a very short list of suppliers. JASC, Johnson Conrols, Honeywell etc.

We don't know if it was a sensor, an actuator or even a hydraulic problem yet.

As to a flimsy sensor, it happens. Same as valve or actuator issues. See Delta IV Heavy during the Orion test when they didn't know if the scrub was caused by sticking valves (a perennial problem on Delta IV) or bad sensor readings. ULA, SpaceX, Aerojet-Rocketdyne etc. get these parts from a very short list of suppliers. JASC, Johnson Conrols, Honeywell etc.

Sorry, didn't mean to make it sound like everybody knew what the problem was.  Just seems like every time they are unable to launch it's due to a bad sensor or something else small.  I would think if that problem keeps happening, someone would come up with something a little better.

http://spaceflightnow.com/2015/01/05/spacex-5-mission-status-center/

0650 GMT (1:50 a.m. EST)

Fueling of the 208-foot-tall Falcon 9 rocket is about to get underway at Cape Canaveral's Complex 40 launch pad.

The two-stage rocket burns RP-1 fuel -- a high-refined kerosene -- and liquid oxygen during today's nine-minute launch sequence.

>

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.