Orbital Sciences Antares 200 launcher (updates)


Recommended Posts

Yeah, and that's what worries me. We'll end up like the old Warsaw Pact Nations, with nothing but decaying ruins that were once monuments of progress and technological advancement.

It broke my very spirit when I saw those images of the old Buran Facilities, because those birds should have had their chance to do amazing things. Can you imagine the photo-op of Buran and Columbia docked at the (now-complete) ISS at the same time in 2002, because the Russian Shuttles were able to assist with the construction?

THIS is what I mean when I say that this pattern of death, destruction and waste needs to end. I probably haven't said it here on Neowin but I've said it elsewhere -- we are our own worst enemy.

That image of Colombia and Buran being at the ISS would have been the iconic space photo, period. All nations are guilty of the silliness...and will continue until we rid ourselves of war mongering politicians/corporations. It will take a concerted effort, but hopefully, mankind will wake up and make up for lost time...newspace ventures could help kick this into gear in the far future.....:)

edit...have to find a way to photoshop this "image"...way too cool......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orbital ATK Delivers Cygnus Service Module to KSC for December Launch to Space Station


12068498_10153585525245479_6031919063584
From Orbital ATK: ” … We shipped the service module for our Cygnus spacecraft to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center for our next ISS cargo resupply mission, scheduled to launch in early December. Today’s OA-4 milestone marks a key step forward as we continue cargo delivery service to the ISS under the Commercial Resupply Services contract.” Photo Credit: Orbital ATK

Nearly one year following a spectacular launch failure at NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility that lit up Virginia’s evening skies (and the evening news), Orbital ATK is gearing up for the planned Dec. 3 launch of an enhanced unmanned Cygnus cargo spacecraft, which will be mated to an Atlas V launch vehicle at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station’s (CCAFS) Launch Complex 41.

 

Orbital ATK announced Tuesday, Oct. 12, that it delivered the cargo ship’s service module to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida, soon to be integrated with the ship’s pressurized cargo module (PCM). The company stated that the service module contains Cygnus’ avionics, electrical, propulsion, and communications systems, while the PCM contains the spacecraft’s cargo volume. The OA-4 mission will mark the first of two planned launches utilizing United Launch Alliance’s Atlas V launch vehicle mated with a Cygnus spacecraft, and the first mission of the enhanced cargo ship, which will be able to carry 7,700 pounds of supplies, experiments, and equipment to the International Space Station (ISS).

 

Cygnus-KSC.thumb.jpg.d15fe058e232468c68b
Cygnus’ Pressurized Cargo Module (PCM) arrives at KSC ahead if the OA-4 mission. Photo Credit: Orbital ATK

 Orbital ATK added in their announcement that the final assembly, cargo loading, and fueling of Cygnus will also take place at KSC. Besides being the first “enhanced” variant of Cygnus, the spacecraft will also boast UltraFlex solar arrays, described as “the latest in lightweight space-qualified power system technology”; these arrays were developed by the company’s Space Components Division.

 

“Over the last few months, 90 [to] 100 MARS employees and contractors worked round the clock to restore Launch Pad 0A to a flight-ready condition. Work began with remediation around the impact site, where the 20-foot-wide, 10-foot-deep crater was filled and contaminants were removed from the topsoil. Damaged structures were repaired and replaced, including liquid propellant feed lines which supply liquid oxygen and kerosene to the rocket and portions of the sound suppression water deluge system, which flood the pad with water to protect it from the energy released at liftoff. New lightning protection towers were installed, two of which were demolished in the explosion. An upgraded hydraulic system was installed, which will be capable of erecting the new Antares in its heavier 230 configuration. Electrical systems, heating and cooling systems, and the pad’s fire alarm were also repaired.” The article underscored that the most critical structures of the pad were fortunately (and incredibly) spared in the rocket’s fall back, and ensuing fire. 


more at the link......
http://www.americaspace.com/?p=87383#more-87383

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so heavy: lithium aluminum. Volume depends on the version as Cygnus is built up by stacking 2, 3 or 4 (for now ; 5+ maybe?) standard rings, then adding the CBM (hatch) bulkhead and service module bulkhead. One version is large enough to serve as a mission habitat for Dragon 2, Starliner or Orion. All cargo Cygnus from now on will be the Enhanced or larger.

Cygnus-Congigurations.jpg

cst100_cygnus_bkgtest2.jpg

And NASA is explpring their use as logistics stations

orbital-nextstep.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost looks like they can be manufactured as long as is needed for the mission. Add a Cupola to the top of that Hub and some more substantial Solar Panels, and the needed internals, and they'd serve quite nicely as Space Station Modules. Only thing they'd really need is an Environmental Cooling/Heating System to deal with the temperature variations of Space.

Ahh, what could have been. Bigelow's Modules leave all of this in the realm of conjecture. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. Another part of the NextSTEP program involves developing habitats for different purposes,  and both OrbitalATK (Cygnus) and Bigelow are getting large contracts over the next 3 years to get them flying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If one needed a remote outpost, these units and the Bigelow units, would make great lodgings, with the ability to house all commercial crew vessels. This is where standards pay off...multiple applications and docking abilities.....all brought up by common lifters.:)

Edit...with a resting frame...pop these on the moon with the Bigelow's as well.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. Another part of the NextSTEP program involves developing habitats for different purposes,  and both OrbitalATK (Cygnus) and Bigelow are getting large contracts over the next 3 years to get them flying.

Oh good. I'm pleased that they're actually moving forward with NextSTEP -- especially with Bigelow's Modules. Orbital has one approach, Bigelow has another. Everyone wins.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The IRT has issued their Antares failure report. Rather damning. Link to the summary PDF is on the NASA page. Outtake below.

http://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-team-provides-summary-of-its-review-of-orbital-atk-accident

 

The  IRT concluded  that  the  cause  of  the explosion  on  launch  was loss of  rotor  radial  positioning  resulting  in contact  and  frictional  rubbing  between  rotating  and stationary  components within  the Engine  LO2 turbopump Hydraulic Balance  Assembly  (HBA)  seal  package.  This  frictional  rubbing  led  to  ignition and fire involving  LO2 within  the turbopump HBA.  This  conclusion is consistent  with the  proximate cause determination made  by  the  Orbital  ATK  AIB  investigation  findings.   Figure  3  highlights  the  general location of  the HBA  within  the  turbopump, but  further  detail  about  the turbopump and HBA  design  is not provided due to proprietary restrictions. 

Technical  Root  Causes

The  IRT  was  not  able to isolate a  single  technical  root  cause  for  the E15  fire and explosion.   The IRT identified three  credible  technical  root  causes  (TRCs),  any  one or  a  combination  of  which could have resulted in the E15  failure: 

TRC-1:   Inadequate design robustness  of  the  AJ26  LO2 HBA  and  turbine-end bearing  for Antares.   After  performing  extensive technical  design evaluation  and  a  number  of  sensitivity analyses  of  the LO2  turbopump, it  became apparent  to  the IRT  that  the HBA  and  thrust  bearing designs have several  intricacies  and  sensitivities  that  make it  difficult  to  reliably  manage bearing loads.  As a  result, this  area  of  the turbopump is vulnerable  to oxygen fire  and failures.    The  AJ26 engines  were not  subjected  to  a  thorough delta-qualification program  to demonstrate  their operational  capability  and  margin for  use  on  Antares.  Performing  a thorough delta-qualification program  for  Antares would  likely  have revealed  these issues.  Furthermore, the  Acceptance  Test Program  (ATP)  established  for  the  AJ26  engines  was  not  sufficient  to  test  and screen  the  engines for  these  design sensitivities and  potential  workmanship issues  that  could  exacerbate those sensitivities.  

TRC-2:   Foreign  Object  Debris  (FOD) introduction to the E15 LO2 turbopump.   Forensic investigation  identified  the  presence  of  both  titanium  and silica  FOD  within  E15 prior  to  its impact  on  the beach.   However, no firm  conclusions can be drawn with respect  to  the quantity  of FOD introduced to  or  already  present  within  the engine prior  to or  at  the time of  the  explosion.    The  lack  of  significant  particle  impact  damage to the recovered  impeller  and other  components indicates  that  there were not  gross-levels of  FOD  present  within  the system.  In addition,  there  is no clear  forensic  evidence that  FOD  directly  or  indirectly  led to the E15  failure.    


TRC-3:   Manufacturing or other  workmanship defect  in  the E15 LO2  turbopump.   Forensic investigation  performed by  Orbital  ATK  and  NASA  discovered  the  presence of  a  defect  on the turbine  housing  bearing  bore  that  was  not  consistent  with baseline  design requirements 3 .  The investigation  determined  that  the  defect  was introduced during  machining  of  the bearing  bore housing  and was  therefore  present  prior  to  the  engine  ATP and Antares launch  for  Orb-3.  Forensic  investigation of  Engine E17, which failed  during  ATP in May  2014,  discovered the presence  of  a  similar  non-conforming  defect  in  the  housing  bearing  bore.  A  limited number  of other  engine  turbine housings (i.e.,  Engine E16 and the  1998 test  engine)  previously  and successfully  subjected to extended ground  tests  and  ATP, as  well  as an  untested spare  turbine housing,  were inspected.   Neither  E16 nor  the spare  housing  showed  any  evidence  of  a  similar manufacturing  defect.  However, the 1998  test  engine  that  had  been  subjected  to  extensive ground testing  exhibited  a similar  defect  to that  observed in Engines  E15 and E17,  but  it  was  not  possible to conclude whether  the defect  was introduced during  manufacturing  or  was the result  of  wear from  extended operation of  the engine.   Sufficient  information is  not  available without  further engine inspections  and  tests  to  conclude  that  the  presence  of  this manufacturing  defect  would always  result  in failure  of  the engine during  operation.

Technical  Findings and Recommendations

The  IRT  developed  six  Technical  Findings (TFs)  associated with  the  technical  root  causes  discussed above.   Seven Technical  Recommendations (TRs)  were  identified by  the IRT  that,  if  fully  implemented, would likely  resolve the technical  root  causes  and prevent  recurrence  of  a  similar  failure  in  the  future. In addition,  since  Orbital  ATK  was  in  the process  of  procuring  and testing  new engines  to  replace the AJ26  for  future Antares flights while  the investigation  was  ongoing, the IRT  provided several  additional technical  recommendations  for  Orbital  ATK  and  the ISS  Program  that  were used  to support  those testing activities  and to reduce  overall  risk  for  Antares return to flight  and  follow-on mission efforts.  Given  the technical  nature of  those  recommendations, they  are not  provided here due  to potential  proprietary  and export control restrictions. 3Further  information  about  the  turbine  bearing  bore  housing  design  and  the  location  and  configuration  of  the  defect  is not provided  due  to  proprietary  restrictions. 
>
>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. WOW. That goes right back to the old "hammer it in backwards" thing that Russian hardware is sometimes known for.

That report is scathing. A proper vetting process wasn't even performed on those engines prior to use ... wow. AND it's a problem they saw before -- which means that it becomes an issue of neglect. Completely preventable failure.

Ouch!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dramatic New Photos of Antares Launch Failure

NASA has added a bunch of not-exactly-recent photos to its Flickr stream, including these dramatic photos of last October Antares launch failure. The Orbital ATK rocket exploded moments after lifting off on what would have been the Cygnus space tug’s third paid cargo run to the International Space Station.

Cygnus is slated to launch Dec. 3 atop an Atlas 5 rocket Orbital ATK bought from United Launch Alliance. Antares, meanwhile, is slated to return to flight next spring using a different engine, the Russian-built RD-181.

The photo dump follows NASA’s Oct. 29 release of the results of its independent failure investigation. The NASA Independent Review Team identified three possible technical root causes of the accident, a conclusion consistent with, but not identical to, Orbital’s own investigation.

http://spacenews.com/dramatic-new-photos-of-antares-launch-failure/

Eye opening.....13 photo's at the link...not enough quota to load here.....
http://spacenews.com/dramatic-new-photos-of-antares-launch-failure/

:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This must have been very distressing for some of their "good employees", knowing if they said something, job gone......sad state of affairs, but karma lives.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Especially after two of those engines had committed seppuku; one in Russia and one at NASA Stennis, before this happened. 

That, in itself, should have been cause for alarm, with a systematic grounding and check of all units...similar to aviation standards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only that but many of the engines had cracks, which Aerojet attempted to salvage by welding them & Orbital signed off on. 

IMO, this was a beginning to end cluster-(fill in the blank)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.