[OFFICIAL] Windows 10 Insider Program


Windows Technical Preview  

1,031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

On ‎9‎/‎8‎/‎2016 at 9:39 PM, UnclePritchard said:

does anyone else get these errors? sfc gets stuck at 19% and stops and personalization crashes.

Yes, Personalization crashing was mentioned in the release notes for this Insider build.  It's not unique to the Personalization page - that same crash happens elsewhere in Settings.

edit: And this is now fixed in the current Insider build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
2 hours ago, UnclePritchard said:

anyone tested it? just downloaded it and curious if sfc issue is really fixed.

It is way better than 14936 the sfc issue in not listed as a known.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

It is way better than 14936 the sfc issue in not listed as a known.

well yes sfc does work...but i see task manager does not remain maximized and probably as many already noticed there's more consumed RAM. for me it increased by 30-40%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UnclePritchard said:

well yes sfc does work...but i see task manager does not remain maximized and probably as many already noticed there's more consumed RAM. for me it increased by 30-40%

Task Manager remains maximized for me. Cortana uses all of the memory. If you do not use it turn it off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Gary7 said:

Windows 10 Build 14942 might increase RAM usage for some users

 

I just saw this thought you would be interested.

From what I've read, the only time it'll use more ram and ungroup service hosts is if you're on a system with more than 3.5GB (4GB) of RAM.     I've got 16GB in my PCs and I always hover around 40-50% used, with the rest sitting there and mostly being used when I play games.    With how cheap it is and how much more and more of us have in our systems, I think it's great that they're going to ungroup service hosts and give us that added benefits such a move brings.   If that means the OS will use another 2GB of ram than before doesn't bother me, at some point down the line I can just upgrade and add more, the mobo is good up to 64GB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, George P said:

From what I've read, the only time it'll use more ram and ungroup service hosts is if you're on a system with more than 3.5GB (4GB) of RAM.     I've got 16GB in my PCs and I always hover around 40-50% used, with the rest sitting there and mostly being used when I play games.    With how cheap it is and how much more and more of us have in our systems, I think it's great that they're going to ungroup service hosts and give us that added benefits such a move brings.   If that means the OS will use another 2GB of ram than before doesn't bother me, at some point down the line I can just upgrade and add more, the mobo is good up to 64GB.

I have 24GB so it does not bother me either.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well i have 4 as my other 2 GB are somewhat faulty... should buy another 4 i guess but haven't had the money yet to do that. task manager issue was a temporary issue of mine apparently. thanks for the feedback

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was using 14936 I had about 62 services running. Now with 14942 , I have 117 services. No wonder users are having memory issues..Why so many services?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gary7 said:

When I was using 14936 I had about 62 services running. Now with 14942 , I have 117 services. No wonder users are having memory issues..Why so many services?

Read the article you linked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎9‎/‎10‎/‎2016 at 8:54 PM, Gary7 said:

When I was using 14936 I had about 62 services running. Now with 14942 , I have 117 services. No wonder users are having memory issues..Why so many services?

Because prior to 14942 you also had +117 services, many of them where just listed as 1 single service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Studio384 said:

Because prior to 14942 you also had +117 services, many of them where just listed as 1 single service.

I know, they just separated them out to make it look like it would equal the memory usage. It is done with Mirrors..:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I'm on the Slow ring, and I have a weird problem since updating to the latest version - the Photos app opens randomly and I don't have the slightest clue why. Am I the only one with this issue?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TDT said:

I'm on the Slow ring, and I have a weird problem since updating to the latest version - the Photos app opens randomly and I don't have the slightest clue why. Am I the only one with this issue?!

If the slow ring is 14965 or 14971 then that is a known issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TDT said:

Yeap, 14965. Any fix?

They say to minimize the open windows then close them but I found that to be BS. If I were you I would switch to the fast ring and get build 14986, it is stable and does not have magical windows..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Gary7 said:

They say to minimize the open windows then close them but I found that to be BS. If I were you I would switch to the fast ring and get build 14986, it is stable and does not have magical windows..

indeed, I can confirm that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎11‎/‎12‎/‎2016 at 6:11 AM, UnclePritchard said:

indeed, I can confirm that.

it does, and restoring after maximizing works too.

 

Unfortunately sleeping the display seems to be borked with my HD4400 set-up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

15002 just outright refuses to install on my tablet. It keeps rolling back and is getting annoying. Anything worth checking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fahim S. said:

15002 just outright refuses to install on my tablet. It keeps rolling back and is getting annoying. Anything worth checking?

 

I would probably wait for the preview release. if that's a production machine, no need to mess with that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.