[OFFICIAL] Windows 10 Insider Program

By Ian S.
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Windows Technical Preview  

1,031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41

  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3

  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71

Recommended Posts

Veteran

Preppy Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
On ‎9‎/‎8‎/‎2016 at 9:39 PM, UnclePritchard said:

does anyone else get these errors? sfc gets stuck at 19% and stops and personalization crashes.

Yes, Personalization crashing was mentioned in the release notes for this Insider build.  It's not unique to the Personalization page - that same crash happens elsewhere in Settings.

edit: And this is now fixed in the current Insider build.

  • 4 weeks later...
Proficient

UnclePritchard

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, Gary7 said:

A site that you can follow the Build Releaases

 

http://changewindows.org/milestone

 

Build 14942 out today Fast Ring

anyone tested it? just downloaded it and curious if sfc issue is really fixed.

Proficient

UnclePritchard

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

It is way better than 14936 the sfc issue in not listed as a known.

well yes sfc does work...but i see task manager does not remain maximized and probably as many already noticed there's more consumed RAM. for me it increased by 30-40%

Grand Master

+Gary7 Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
2 minutes ago, UnclePritchard said:

well yes sfc does work...but i see task manager does not remain maximized and probably as many already noticed there's more consumed RAM. for me it increased by 30-40%

Task Manager remains maximized for me. Cortana uses all of the memory. If you do not use it turn it off.

Grand Master

+Gary7 Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
11 hours ago, UnclePritchard said:

well yes sfc does work...but i see task manager does not remain maximized and probably as many already noticed there's more consumed RAM. for me it increased by 30-40%

Windows 10 Build 14942 might increase RAM usage for some users

 

I just saw this thought you would be interested.

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted
13 hours ago, Gary7 said:

Windows 10 Build 14942 might increase RAM usage for some users

 

I just saw this thought you would be interested.

From what I've read, the only time it'll use more ram and ungroup service hosts is if you're on a system with more than 3.5GB (4GB) of RAM.     I've got 16GB in my PCs and I always hover around 40-50% used, with the rest sitting there and mostly being used when I play games.    With how cheap it is and how much more and more of us have in our systems, I think it's great that they're going to ungroup service hosts and give us that added benefits such a move brings.   If that means the OS will use another 2GB of ram than before doesn't bother me, at some point down the line I can just upgrade and add more, the mobo is good up to 64GB.

Grand Master

+Gary7 Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
32 minutes ago, George P said:

From what I've read, the only time it'll use more ram and ungroup service hosts is if you're on a system with more than 3.5GB (4GB) of RAM.     I've got 16GB in my PCs and I always hover around 40-50% used, with the rest sitting there and mostly being used when I play games.    With how cheap it is and how much more and more of us have in our systems, I think it's great that they're going to ungroup service hosts and give us that added benefits such a move brings.   If that means the OS will use another 2GB of ram than before doesn't bother me, at some point down the line I can just upgrade and add more, the mobo is good up to 64GB.

I have 24GB so it does not bother me either.:)

Grand Master

adrynalyne

Posted
Posted
Just now, Gary7 said:

When I was using 14936 I had about 62 services running. Now with 14942 , I have 117 services. No wonder users are having memory issues..Why so many services?

Read the article you linked.

Veteran

Studio384

Posted
Posted
On ‎9‎/‎10‎/‎2016 at 8:54 PM, Gary7 said:

When I was using 14936 I had about 62 services running. Now with 14942 , I have 117 services. No wonder users are having memory issues..Why so many services?

Because prior to 14942 you also had +117 services, many of them where just listed as 1 single service.

Grand Master

+Gary7 Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
Just now, Studio384 said:

Because prior to 14942 you also had +117 services, many of them where just listed as 1 single service.

I know, they just separated them out to make it look like it would equal the memory usage. It is done with Mirrors..:)

  • 1 month later...
Grand Master

+Gary7 Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
1 hour ago, TDT said:

I'm on the Slow ring, and I have a weird problem since updating to the latest version - the Photos app opens randomly and I don't have the slightest clue why. Am I the only one with this issue?!

If the slow ring is 14965 or 14971 then that is a known issue.

Grand Master

+Gary7 Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
2 hours ago, TDT said:

Yeap, 14965. Any fix?

They say to minimize the open windows then close them but I found that to be BS. If I were you I would switch to the fast ring and get build 14986, it is stable and does not have magical windows..

Proficient

UnclePritchard

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Gary7 said:

They say to minimize the open windows then close them but I found that to be BS. If I were you I would switch to the fast ring and get build 14986, it is stable and does not have magical windows..

indeed, I can confirm that.

  • 4 weeks later...
Community Regular

LittleFroggy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Fahim S. said:

15002 just outright refuses to install on my tablet. It keeps rolling back and is getting annoying. Anything worth checking?

 

I would probably wait for the preview release. if that's a production machine, no need to mess with that

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing