Windows Technical Preview  

1,031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

There's no doubt that winrt is going to be what they push going forward but for now they're making it possible to call/user win32 APIs from within modern/metro apps. The only question here is do they keep that or try to redo many of the old win32 stuff as new winrt ones?

 

I think in the end we'll see a pure winrt environment with very little if any win32 code left, even on the desktop. They can do this because the OS already has the ability to either emulate the legacy bits or just run old apps in a VM using something like app-v.

 

Using more fresh, new and most important, legacy code free winrt APIs going forward is better in my opinion. Now that you can have apps windowed or full screen with responsive UIs so they can adapt to the device type then you can do quite a lot and have less of a need to use the older technology.

Just work to make the winrt APIs more feature rich/mature and the make it as easy as it can be to port android apps in VS as it can get, heck if they can mirror things closely then I really don't see how the excuse of "it costs too much" can still be used.

 

So as far as the post goes, W10 will ship with IE 11 and the as of yet unnamed 'Spartan' browser? No other updates for IE, then?

Nope. Also, some leftovers that originally were present in 8.1, even if you didn't have MC, have been removed. My guess is that with 10, it is officially dead.

 

Thanks.

I wonder what their plan for WordPad is when they release the new versions of Office, which I assume would be free.

TBH it's such an insignificant application. I'm sure it'll be left in the file system.

Games in Photos? Yep... Probably part of their machine learning, they have built "games" to teach the system what to identify in images:

2hwkzmu.jpg

24f0e1x.jpg

350m7o3.jpg

wbqhig.jpg

r1y6aw.jpg

 

11wdijk.jpg

1z7zo7.jpg

x0tnyc.jpgs6lyra.jpg

1zqbo21.jpg20jxja.jpg

33aasjo.jpg

Issues loading their default image stack...

I expect all of those little apps to get updated modern versions, but things like fax and scan are probably low on the list, I've never used the fax ability in windows personally.

 

I bet the store beta backend servers are only working internally on the OS groups intranet and not outside of MS.

Spartan is just the codename for what I expect they'll call IE12. There's no way they'll just drop the IE brand now IMO.

 

I wouldn't expect them to drop the IE brand either, especially with the improvements they've made since 9, but if we're to go with what MJ has written (and she has been right on quite a few occasions) : " Microsoft is building a new browser, codenamed Spartan, which is not IE 12 -- at least according to a couple of sources of mine." . So Spartan isn't IE 12. 

Whatever they are doing, it will still be based on the IE code. They won't just throw away all that hard work done throughout the years through the window.

The way it sounds Spartan could just basically be trident from v9 and up without the older IE8 and older legacy code.  Or it could just be only html5 standards with nothing else.

The way it sounds Spartan could just basically be trident from v9 and up without the older IE8 and older legacy code.  Or it could just be only html5 standards with nothing else.

I think Spartan will be just that (spartan as in simple) and just the metro or immersive browser.

I don't expect there to be two front end browsers but two underlying trident engines. Depending on what you need you'll either get the old or new for a site. The user shouldn't even know when it's using one or the other only that websites load.

I thought they were eliminating the dual browsers?

 

As far as I know, yes. They could do the same thing that you can do in Chrome now: Add an option to just switch to the Immersive version. I'm not a developer so I'm not aware of this, but can you write code and have the GUI adapt according to which operating environment it is in?  

The modern/winrt apps can scale to show more on bigger screens or they can change their layout, we've already seen this with how apps change when snapped to the side. As far as going from a desktop mode UI to a tablet or phone UI I think it's already possible to have your apps change on the fly, so going from windowed on the desktop to full screen buttons and other elements can scale up and be more touch friendly and so on.

?

 

I expect all of those little apps to get updated modern versions, but things like fax and scan are probably low on the list, I've never used the fax ability in windows personally.

 

I bet the store beta backend servers are only working internally on the OS groups intranet and not outside of MS.

 

There is already a scan app in Windows 8.1.

This topic is now closed to further replies.