Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, DocM said:

FAA Operations Plan Advisory for Feb. 26 includes a SpaceX Starship launch,

 

https://www.fly.faa.gov/adv/adv_spt.jsp

 

No Evacuation notice has been given so likely another SF at this point

Well ... they nailed the landing ... now just gotta keep it from undergoing a RUD after landing.  :) 

 

Will be interesting to see what the cause was ... wouldn't doubt if the bottom tank got breached by flame.  It seemed like it was still cooking a little after landing ... the "launch" appeared to be the bottom tank releasing its contents (methane?).  Just my observation.  

Looked like some legs didn't lock when they deployed, causing it to land hard and stand on a rear fin. Then a leak (lines? tank?) caused the post-landing fire which a while later blew the tanks.

 

These were Legs v1.0 with improvements in SN-11, and further upgrades should be in in SN-15. SN's 12-14 have been scrapped as SN-15 makes the early vehicle design obsolete. SN-11 should roll out soon, with SN-15 stacking in the High Bay.

 

This is 'hardware rich development,' which is a bit like Whack-a-Mole; build, launch, break, fix, repeat. 

 

Edited by DocM

SpaceX's Principal Integration Engineer/webcaster "Big John" Insprucker refers to the belly flop a the "Adama Maneuver" and former astronaut/head of SpaceX Commercial Crew Garrett Reisman seconded it. Guess that makes it official 😃

 

#SoSayWeAll #BSG

 

 

 

On 04/03/2021 at 04:07, DocM said:

Looked like some legs didn't lock when they deployed, causing it to land hard and stand on a rear fin. Then a leak (lines? tank?) caused the post-landing fire which a while later blew the tanks.

 

These were Legs v1.0 with improvements in SN-11, and further upgrades should be in in SN-15. SN's 12-14 have been scrapped as SN-15 makes the early vehicle design obsolete. SN-11 should roll out soon, with SN-15 stacking in the High Bay.

 

This is 'hardware rich development,' which is a bit like Whack-a-Mole; build, launch, break, fix, repeat. 

 

I'm sure Elon said they were still working on leg concepts so the fact the thing stood as long as it did was pretty amazing.

I saw a tweet from Michael B from NSF that there are road closures coming on Monday so he's speculating that might be SN11s rollout to the pad then.

13 hours ago, Skiver said:

I'm sure Elon said they were still working on leg concepts so the fact the thing stood as long as it did was pretty amazing.

I saw a tweet from Michael B from NSF that there are road closures coming on Monday so he's speculating that might be SN11s rollout to the pad then.

The next leg iteration isn't "the big one" but that's coming.  And yes, the SN-11 rollout should happen next week.

 

Meanwhile, the Super Heavy thrust puck testing hardware is arriving. Part of Super Heavy BN-1 is in the High Bay behind SN-11.

 

 

Well, well...

 

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/new-nasa-partnerships-to-mature-commercial-space-technologies-capabilities

 

Quote

SpaceX will partner with NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, to capture imagery and thermal measurements of its Starship vehicle during orbital re-entry over the Pacific Ocean. With the data, the company plans to advance a reusable thermal protection system, which protects the vehicle from aerodynamic heating, for missions returning from low-Earth orbit, the Moon, and Mars.

 

Updated SpaceX Boca Chica site plans were found on an Army Corps of Engineers site, about 29 mb.

 

https://www.swg.usace.army.mil/Media/Public-Notices/Article/2524314/swg-2013-00381-space-exploration-technologies-inc-spacex-wetlands-cameron-count/

 

Quote

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:  SpaceX proposed to modify the existing permit for the continued development of the SpaceX vertical launch area with the expansion and addition of test, orbital, and landing pads, integration towers, associated infrastructure, stormwater management features and vehicle parking.  The proposed expansion will impact 10.94 acres of mud flats, 5.94 acres of estuarine wetlands, and 0.28 acres of non-tidal wetlands. 

 

PDF

 

https://www.swg.usace.army.mil/Portals/26/docs/regulatory/PN March/Plans_201300381.pdf?ver=hid3b2HjHCZZNucHf1LGzw%3D%3D

 

Highlighting the changes...

 

 

 

Edited by DocM

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now