The bats*it Russia v Ukraine (NFT Crypto Nazi conspiracy thread)


Recommended Posts

On 01/03/2022 at 19:54, Sun-Tzu said:

190820896_Screenshotfrom2022-03-0116-43-26.thumb.png.8cba0e8e3bd01395799530288cec3de7.png1358024825_Screenshotfrom2022-03-0116-47-52.thumb.png.5e7704f3a72050c46650de2667cbff92.png1083904169_Screenshotfrom2022-03-0116-50-53.thumb.png.9b22d34d34bbaa1f282e146c061ed94f.png547217763_Screenshotfrom2022-03-0116-51-55.thumb.png.cc4c15baf47abf53583607baa3d2d4c3.png

Addendum:

 

Screenshot from 2022-03-01 16-52-47.png

This way, please.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/02/24/putin-denazify-ukraine/

Putin says he will ‘denazify’ Ukraine. Here’s the history behind that claim.

 

This is the Ukraine Azov battalion. So now we understand why the Deep State is protecting Ukraine. Many would be greatly served to research on a man named Klaus Schwab.

His COVID-19: the Great reset: https://carterheavyindustries.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/covid-19_-the-great-reset-klaus-schwab.pdf

This is one nasty sandwich these elites have created.

1cfafd8c66876921.png.5ad191ec18eb5f5bb981e88a5ed5e8e2.png63a85702680528fc.jpeg.17169f109cd5d4c9d0f7ee1d692b810e.jpeg

00e00d7089d657e1.thumb.jpeg.a3b4f9375d87a92ddbadb683733e6bea.jpeg

 

On 03/03/2022 at 12:47, mudslag said:

 

 

how to say gullible in Russian: doverchivyy

Yeah, I'm so gullible I didn't fall for the COVID jab either. 😆

On 04/03/2022 at 01:28, wakjak said:

Was certainly waiting for something like this... funny how the russian bots make their way to specific threads and the disinformation they attempt to push.

spit-take-drink.gif.d39cd97bb3461ff17006f20ab8a4abb2.gif

 

bott.thumb.jpg.b4abab77504a3b7e4fdc966ec70b1116.jpg

On 03/03/2022 at 20:16, Sun-Tzu said:

*Language Warning in graphic

697271816_Screenshotfrom2022-03-0317-12-32.thumb.png.8d2336f31af40a3f002516cd9f9a4135.png

Must be a shortage of aluminum foil.

  • Haha 2
On 03/03/2022 at 20:16, Sun-Tzu said:

*Language Warning in graphic

697271816_Screenshotfrom2022-03-0317-12-32.thumb.png.8d2336f31af40a3f002516cd9f9a4135.png

Been sniffing the lead paint again ehh?  BTW there's a forum category for conspiracies over here

  • Like 2
On 03/03/2022 at 21:55, Sun-Tzu said:

To put this Ukraine thing into context, the reporting is as phony as Anderson coopers (Gloria Vanderbilts son) fake hurricane reporting.

 

download.png.26c90a04103e249e7bf61acb48187517.png1567919003_UkrainebombwasactuallyinGaza-fake.png.afe90045c94f12ba52da10dd8ba69165.png

Attacking a NPP is phony too?  Because it's sure as heck happening right now live You cite tweets... prove they didn't make that stuff up themselves also...

 

but apparently you fell for propaganda yourself..

 

1) The anderson cooper thing was not faked, watch the video from that time, there is a drop he is indeed lower and walking in high water were he was at... he is not "kneeing" there is a small hill there and he is inside the deeper water.. the only people that can't see this if they watch the real unedited video from this are trump jr. lovers / trump supporters that will listen to anything but logic to prove everyone but trump and fox news are bad...

2) that was a russain rocked that hit ukraine in 2014, the other two are faked, the 2014 image predates the others by years...

Edited by neufuse
On 03/03/2022 at 19:33, DocM said:

American English (mis)-interpreted by users of the  Queens English, who then tell Americans what it meant can get downright silly.  

You’re quite embarrassing aren’t you…

  • Like 2
  • Facepalm 1
On 03/03/2022 at 21:55, Sun-Tzu said:

To put this Ukraine thing into context, the reporting is as phony as Anderson coopers (Gloria Vanderbilts son) fake hurricane reporting.

 

download.png.26c90a04103e249e7bf61acb48187517.png1567919003_UkrainebombwasactuallyinGaza-fake.png.afe90045c94f12ba52da10dd8ba69165.png

The tweet on the left is fake news but not from CNN. LOL Why are peddling right wing social media propaganda? The images were from Hurricane Ike and NOT Hurricane Florence while the actual broadcast actually was showing the difference in water depth. It was debunked at the time but i guess you didn't get the message. #facepalm This makes me question the image on the right as just Photoshop funny business.

On 04/03/2022 at 09:50, NFT_QUEEN said:

 

 

 

He's entitled to his "opinion" being it based on no facts whatsoever.

On 04/03/2022 at 14:55, primortal said:

He's entitled to his "opinion" being it based on no facts whatsoever.

I disagree.  His "opinion" is the only lie in his post and no one is "entitled" to lie.

  • Like 2
On 04/03/2022 at 10:02, FloatingFatMan said:

I disagree.  His "opinion" is the only lie in his post and no one is "entitled" to lie.

That's why I put opinion in quotes :)

 

Everyone has switched from armchair virologist experts to armchair foreign affairs experts.

On 04/03/2022 at 15:05, primortal said:

That's why I put opinion in quotes :)

 

Everyone has switched from armchair virologist experts to armchair foreign affairs experts.

I'm sure there will be some armchair nuclear physicists along soon to give them a hand...

On 04/03/2022 at 09:50, NFT_QUEEN said:

 

 

 

I'm sorry but what was the lie? The attack on the nuclear plant or that the reactors were leaking? The US will not jump into a war without verification, but even if they were attacked and was melting down, I doubt that the US would intervene at this point.

  • Like 3
On 04/03/2022 at 18:37, primortal said:

 

 

 

Quote

 

18 U.S. Code § 1038 - False information and hoaxes

 

(a)Criminal Violation.—

(1)In general.—Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505(b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123(b) of title 49, shall—(A)

be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;

(B)

if serious bodily injury results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and

(C)

if death results, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any number of years up to life, or both.

 

(2)Armed forces.—Any person who makes a false statement, with intent to convey false or misleading information, about the death, injury, capture, or disappearance of a member of the Armed Forces of the United States during a war or armed conflict in which the United States is engaged—(A) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;

(B)

if serious bodily injury results, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and

(C)

if death results, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any number of years or for life, or both.

 

 

  • Facepalm 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.