Computer hardware for radiologists ( 1 or 2 )


Recommended Posts

Which one is better number 1 or 2? Please do reply:)

 

1: Dell Precision 5820

Specs: 

 Processor Xeon W-2245 6 core 3.6 GHz

Ram : 32GB

 512GB NVMe SSD

Graphics: Nvidia RTX A2000

 

2: Dell Precision 3260

 

 Processor Core i9-12900

Ram : 32GB

 512GB NVMe SSD

Graphics: Nvidia RTX 3000

Well now I have questions since I service medical and dental offices, The title for your post isn't just cut and dry I would make a selection depending on the tool for the job.... Is this going to be a server or a workstation?  IS this going to be the system that receives the pics via either network or hardwire, I have so many questions.

  • Like 4

if this is going to be a viewing/reporting workstation then the most thing will be a diagnostic grade display. As for the other things it depends on what the radiologist plans to use this machine for eg will it be used for things like 3D reconstruction ?

  • Like 3
On 03/04/2023 at 11:32, DoctorD said:

Well now I have questions since I service medical and dental offices, The title for your post isn't just cut and dry I would make a selection depending on the tool for the job.... Is this going to be a server or a workstation?  IS this going to be the system that receives the pics via either network or hardwire, I have so many questions.

It is Workstation to see x-ray etc high quality pictures via a software.

All of our radiologist stations are Xeons with Quadros (now the RTX Axxx series)...Barcos for the displays.  For radiologist stations, I've never seen the desktop line CPU/GPU/Monitors being used.

Biggest thing is proper calibrated diagnostic monitors...especially if Mammo is being read.

Your PACs vendor doesn't recommend hardware?  

  • Like 3

Depending on the software and there are quite a few that I have ran across that the image is stored to the device temp then server and offsite secure storage for viewing and or manipulation I would check with the vendor.   Side note I have a dentist that uses an Ipad pro to look at dental images in 360 degrees to determine planning.  Personally, I would just go with the Xenon and focus on the monitor requirements as a few have also suggested.

  • Like 1
On 03/04/2023 at 16:23, DoctorD said:

Depending on the software and there are quite a few that I have ran across that the image is stored to the device temp then server and offsite secure storage for viewing and or manipulation I would check with the vendor.   Side note I have a dentist that uses an Ipad pro to look at dental images in 360 degrees to determine planning.  Personally, I would just go with the Xenon and focus on the monitor requirements as a few have also suggested.

Monitor is  EIZO radiforce rx360/ and som other models from EIZO. 

On 03/04/2023 at 14:28, Jim K said:

All of our radiologist stations are Xeons with Quadros (now the RTX Axxx series)...Barcos for the displays.  For radiologist stations, I've never seen the desktop line CPU/GPU/Monitors being used.

Biggest thing is proper calibrated diagnostic monitors...especially if Mammo is being read.

Your PACs vendor doesn't recommend hardware?  

actually we were using Xeons but now there is only one IT advisor who says we must use i9 processor because it is a strong:). i think i have to talk to PACs vendor.

On 03/04/2023 at 11:44, ranasrule said:

if this is going to be a viewing/reporting workstation then the most thing will be a diagnostic grade display. As for the other things it depends on what the radiologist plans to use this machine for eg will it be used for things like 3D reconstruction ?

PACs software.

On 04/04/2023 at 02:37, internet.security said:

actually we were using Xeons but now there is only one IT advisor who says we must use i9 processor because it is a strong:). i think i have to talk to PACs vendor.

yeah the i9 is going to be "Faster" not "strong" it has more cores, but remember i series chips aren't made for mission critical environments, Xeons are designed for that. If you are doing RAD work I'd want ECC memory to prevent errors... even with the i9 if it supports DDR5 even that's not true ECC memory

I'm going to bet the software is depending more on the GPU than the CPU if it's imaging software or depends on CUDA... I'd put the money into a higher end GPU and more RAM/VRAM if that is the case

  • Like 1
On 04/04/2023 at 01:37, internet.security said:

actually we were using Xeons but now there is only one IT advisor who says we must use i9 processor because it is a strong:). i think i have to talk to PACs vendor.

I would stick with the Xeons and Quadro/RTX Axxx/Radeon line (whatever is recommended by your vendor)  What PACS are you all using?

 

On 04/04/2023 at 01:44, internet.security said:

Both are Workstations but dell precision 3260 is a compact  ( like small form factor) but not proper big box workstation like dell precision 5820.

Speaking of, we have the 5820 deployed throughout our facility (Philips Vue PACS).  Another facility I worked at, we had Xeons and Radeon Pros for our GE Centricity workstations.

  • Like 1
On 04/04/2023 at 14:44, Jim K said:

I would stick with the Xeons and Quadro/RTX Axxx/Radeon line (whatever is recommended by your vendor)  What PACS are you all using?

 

Speaking of, we have the 5820 deployed throughout our facility (Philips Vue PACS).  Another facility I worked at, we had Xeons and Radeon Pros for our GE Centricity workstations.

we are using Philips Vue PACS as well. Let me talk get Vendor recommendations:)

Hello,

Have you checked with the vendor(s) of the software the radiologists will be using on the computers?  Often, medical diagnostic software is qualified to run on specific hardware models, or they may have specific recommendations about what is supported.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.