coucou Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 Hi, Regarding the WindowsXP-KB821253-x86-ENU.exe batch file inside Autopatcher Core.db , i think there is an error. Here the code inside Autopatcher Core.db <batch uniqueID="Q821253"> "{apdirectory}\ProgFiles\Q821253_WXP_SP2_x86_ENU.exe" /q /z set ERRORLEVEL=0</batch> <batch uniqueID="Q821253b"> "{apdirectory}\ProgFiles\Q821253_WXP_SP2_x86_ENU.exe" /q /n /o /z set ERRORLEVEL=0</batch> Which should be <batch uniqueID="Q821253"> "{apdirectory}\ProgFiles\WindowsXP-KB821253-x86-ENU.exe" /q /z set ERRORLEVEL=0</batch> <batch uniqueID="Q821253"> "{apdirectory}\ProgFiles\WindowsXP-KB821253-x86-ENU.exe" /q /n /o /z set ERRORLEVEL=0</batch> Isn't it??? Please confirm! Regards coucou Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Author Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 Hi,Regarding the WindowsXP-KB821253-x86-ENU.exe batch file inside Autopatcher Core.db , i think there is an error. Here the code inside Autopatcher Core.db <batch uniqueID="Q821253"> "{apdirectory}\ProgFiles\Q821253_WXP_SP2_x86_ENU.exe" /q /z set ERRORLEVEL=0</batch> <batch uniqueID="Q821253b"> "{apdirectory}\ProgFiles\Q821253_WXP_SP2_x86_ENU.exe" /q /n /o /z set ERRORLEVEL=0</batch> Which should be <batch uniqueID="Q821253"> "{apdirectory}\ProgFiles\WindowsXP-KB821253-x86-ENU.exe" /q /z set ERRORLEVEL=0</batch> <batch uniqueID="Q821253"> "{apdirectory}\ProgFiles\WindowsXP-KB821253-x86-ENU.exe" /q /n /o /z set ERRORLEVEL=0</batch> Isn't it??? Please confirm! Regards coucou Nope, it's fine. BUT! It turns out I have the same file in twice, so I'll just delete WindowsXP-KB821253-x86-ENU.exe from the next release. :) @blueshirt - I'm thinking about it... this makes me wary: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueshirt Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 What's wrong with it? The 180 day license? Prerelease? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akaladis Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 hmmm... i guess its a no-no then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Author Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 What's wrong with it? The 180 day license? Prerelease? The 180-day license I'm thinkin'... but who knows. I'll give it some more thought... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueshirt Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 Is it illegal to use a beta/prerelease app? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akaladis Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 i'd think so :s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Author Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 i'd think so :s Well, in this case it's coming from a Public Preview, so I don't think that's an issue... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akaladis Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 aye, but even like that, wouldnt it be kinda lame to include a 180-day public preview release in autopatcher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Author Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 aye, but even like that, wouldnt it be kinda lame to include a 180-day public preview release in autopatcher? See, that's what I was thinking. Of course, part of me knows there will be a new release in less than 180 days, so I'm torn. :s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueshirt Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 Let's just wait for the newer releases. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akaladis Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 of course there will be a new build in less than 180 days, but lets just keep quality software in... its hard to handle all those mystirious hotfix issues (i.e slowdowns) as it is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Author Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 of course there will be a new build in less than 180 days, but lets just keep quality software in... its hard to handle all those mystirious hotfix issues (i.e slowdowns) as it is... I know. I said earlier I was leaning towards "no". Plus, the size of the package is stagering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueshirt Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 How big is the March update? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Author Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 How big is the March update? As it stands it will be about the same size as the Feb... wasn't too too much out. Just adding in the DBE (hopefully), replacing some things, etc. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akaladis Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 dunno if DBE will make it... apparently memodude is busy lately, and he hasnt finished the save routine... and no, dont even think of puting me to do it... i'm not messing with XML... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EZRecovery Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 I know. I said earlier I was leaning towards "no". Plus, the size of the package is stagering. I'm with you guys, APXP is a great program plus is quality like Raptor said. If it was me working on APXP and you guys ask for my opinion, i would say "NO" to add the 180day release. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueshirt Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 In case (just in case you forgot =p) new versions of Media Player Classic and Sun Jave are out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akaladis Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 blueshirt: hehe, as if it was news... new versions of those come almost every day hahaha EXRec: dont worry, i already said "no" so it wont go in :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Author Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 dunno if DBE will make it... apparently memodude is busy lately, and he hasnt finished the save routine... and no, dont even think of puting me to do it... i'm not messing with XML... Dang it Memo! :crazy: @blueshirt - I know, will be ready for the next release. :) And Raptor, what you mean "dont worry, i already said 'no' so it wont go in"? Don't make me come down there and put a smack down on ya! :laugh: We both said "no", foo'! :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EZRecovery Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 EXRec: dont worry, i already said "no" so it wont go in :D ok Program Manager :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akaladis Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 aye... meant: if one of us says 'no' then the answer is 'no' (i.e 1 'no' and 1 'yes' equal 'no') /Raptor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EZRecovery Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 aye... meant: if one of us says 'no' then the answer is 'no' (i.e 1 'no' and 1 'yes' equal 'no')/Raptor I got you, I know the rules now ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akaladis Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 thats how it works when you have 2 project managers :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlishFun Veteran Posted March 22, 2004 Author Veteran Share Posted March 22, 2004 thats how it works when you have 2 project managers :D haha Yep... sorry, I'm dealin' with a semi-crisis here (two laptops went missing), and read your post wrong. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts