molox48 Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 (edited) For those trying to make run OS X in there PC and cant well there is amulator call Basillick runs MAC OS 8.1 for star you can install ,run ,surf internet whaterver you like so *snipped*- Warez = bad. Edited May 22, 2004 by configure Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
neufuse Veteran Posted May 21, 2004 Veteran Share Posted May 21, 2004 now if this isn't old news :) just to add to what he said, apple also has old mac os versions for free on their web site if you know where on there to look for them Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2141929 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Derf Veteran Posted May 21, 2004 Veteran Share Posted May 21, 2004 If anyone can decrypt the thread title then please let me know.... Quote Does that cant run OS X !, Not OSX but is MAC Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2141931 Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadishTM Veteran Posted May 21, 2004 Veteran Share Posted May 21, 2004 A bit late arn't you?, PearPC runs OS X :rofl: Radish? Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2141934 Share on other sites More sharing options...
neufuse Veteran Posted May 21, 2004 Veteran Share Posted May 21, 2004 btw you spelled it wrong, its Basilisk Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2141939 Share on other sites More sharing options...
molox48 Posted May 21, 2004 Author Share Posted May 21, 2004 yeah i know it old news but .....is good :whistle: Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2141940 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rek Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 tad behind time :p PearPC ;) Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2142008 Share on other sites More sharing options...
JK1150 Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 Basilisk is very fast though i have to say Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2142023 Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat37 Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 Apple's Core OS On Your PC, For Free Frequent contributor CptSiskoX sends this along: http://developer.apple.com/darwin/ http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsour...rwin-701.iso.gz (ISO of Darwin 7.01 for x86/PowerPC - which is basically MacOS 10.2) more stuff: http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/ also see: http://www.opensource.apple.com/projects/d....0/release.html Darwin (aka Mac OS X) - ISO image available as free download for PowerPC *and* x86 (Intel/AMD/etc.) FAQ: http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/darwin/faq.html It's based on BSD Unix. So my understanding is, now you can basically run MacOS X on your Athlon or P4 or whatever. <g> --- CptSiskoX Thanks for the links, Cpt! What's going on here is this: Many years ago, when Steve Jobs left Apple, he founded NeXT, which produced a system that was a technical marvel but that ultimately failed because almost no one could afford it. Its OS (NeXTStep) was based on a Unix variant. When Jobs returned to Apple, he inherited an aging Mac OS that was embarrassingly out of date, long surpassed by Windows in power and capability. So, Jobs sought to combine the best of the NeXT OS with the best of the Mac OS: The Mac OS X was the result--- a modern, fully up to date, and very nice operating system. Although the full OS X only runs on Macs, its core is not owned by Apple: It's based on Open Source software, which has developed in parallel with the Apple (and before that, NeXT) implementations. (See http://www.opendarwin.org/ ) The OpenDarwin project gives PC users a chance to explore the guts of the Mac OS. There's even a "DarWine" project to let you run Windows applications, unmodified, on Darwin. I wouldn't recommend OpenDarwin as a first choice for a day-to-day working environment (Windows, OS X, or any of the more complete Linux distributions would be better for that), but it is an interesting project, and an impressive display of cross-platform portability. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2142281 Share on other sites More sharing options...
session Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 molox48 said: For those trying to make run OS X in there PC and cantwell there is amulator call Basillick runs MAC OS 8.1 for star you can install ,run ,surf internet whaterver you like so do a search in overnet other peer to peer software, you will find it :yes: I don't understand what the topic means at all :/ "Does that can't run OSX" oh man... your english... :pinch: Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2142285 Share on other sites More sharing options...
MxxCon Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 molox48 said: well there is amulator call Basillick runs MAC OS 8.1 for star you can install ,run ,surf internet whaterver you like so what's "amulator"? why would i want to "install ,run ,surf" for "star"? :huh: you need to learn neowin rules Neowin rule #2 said: No Warez (links) & Cracks: help, requests or posts that discuss circumvention. This includes linking to software, posting about it, and suggesting to get it. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2142298 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redestium Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 :| Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2142321 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack_canada Posted May 21, 2004 Share Posted May 21, 2004 (edited) *snipped* Edited May 22, 2004 by configure Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2142327 Share on other sites More sharing options...
configure Veteran Posted May 22, 2004 Veteran Share Posted May 22, 2004 Keep the whole "oh no! you can't speak english! bafahahahaha" comment canned. You don't have to make fun of someone just because they can't speak your language. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2142730 Share on other sites More sharing options...
corrosive23 Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 topcat37 said: Apple's Core OS On Your PC, For FreeFrequent contributor CptSiskoX sends this along: http://developer.apple.com/darwin/ http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsour...rwin-701.iso.gz (ISO of Darwin 7.01 for x86/PowerPC - which is basically MacOS 10.2) more stuff: http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/ also see: http://www.opensource.apple.com/projects/d....0/release.html Darwin (aka Mac OS X) - ISO image available as free download for PowerPC *and* x86 (Intel/AMD/etc.) FAQ: http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/darwin/faq.html It's based on BSD Unix. So my understanding is, now you can basically run MacOS X on your Athlon or P4 or whatever. <g> --- CptSiskoX Thanks for the links, Cpt! What's going on here is this: Many years ago, when Steve Jobs left Apple, he founded NeXT, which produced a system that was a technical marvel but that ultimately failed because almost no one could afford it. Its OS (NeXTStep) was based on a Unix variant. When Jobs returned to Apple, he inherited an aging Mac OS that was embarrassingly out of date, long surpassed by Windows in power and capability. So, Jobs sought to combine the best of the NeXT OS with the best of the Mac OS: The Mac OS X was the result--- a modern, fully up to date, and very nice operating system. Although the full OS X only runs on Macs, its core is not owned by Apple: It's based on Open Source software, which has developed in parallel with the Apple (and before that, NeXT) implementations. (See http://www.opendarwin.org/ ) The OpenDarwin project gives PC users a chance to explore the guts of the Mac OS. There's even a "DarWine" project to let you run Windows applications, unmodified, on Darwin. I wouldn't recommend OpenDarwin as a first choice for a day-to-day working environment (Windows, OS X, or any of the more complete Linux distributions would be better for that), but it is an interesting project, and an impressive display of cross-platform portability. darwin sucks it harder than solaris 9 for x86, every time ive downloaded it the iso has been corrupt or craps out during partitioning. and its just the bare framework that osx is built on so dont call it osx for x86 because its not, its not even at the freebsd level, hell i would solaris 9 before darwin and that says alot. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2142989 Share on other sites More sharing options...
klop Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 :blink: Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2143012 Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron901 Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 very old mate. who wants to run OS 8.1 anyway? it's worse than Windows 98. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2143024 Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoochieMamma Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 aaron901 said: very old mate. who wants to run OS 8.1 anyway? it's worse than Windows 98. Whoa, lets not go nuts here NOTHING is worse than 98 :yes: Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2143032 Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron901 Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 HoochieMamma said: Whoa, lets not go nuts here NOTHING is worse than 98 :yes: oh yes there is. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2143052 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southern Patriot Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 neufuse said: btw you spelled it wrong, its Basilisk Still not quite right, it's Basilisk II. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2143054 Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoochieMamma Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 aaron901 said: oh yes there is. WOW really? man they MUST be BADDDD! :x Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2143063 Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpu killer Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 HoochieMamma said: WOW really? man they MUST be BADDDD! :x WinME ;). Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2143070 Share on other sites More sharing options...
klop Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 cpu killer said: WinME ;). This is one of the best example! Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2143080 Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoochieMamma Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 cpu killer said: WinME ;). Oh how could I be so blind :blush: WinME THAT SUCKED A$$ ROYAL! Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2143086 Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpu killer Posted May 22, 2004 Share Posted May 22, 2004 HoochieMamma said: Oh how could I be so blind :blush: WinME THAT SUCKED A$$ ROYAL! klop said: This is one of the best example! (Y) :yes: Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/169499-does-that-cant-run-os-x/#findComment-2144250 Share on other sites More sharing options...
)
Recommended Posts