[FX] bangbang023: 07-01-30 [Trunk/Win32](O2/GAL)


Recommended Posts

the fact that things like "bold" and "strong' don't work and there is heavy artifacting on the neowin front page makes it unuseable. I'll be resuming builds but without cairo included.

Those are fixed now :)

Weird wont let me edit my last post, pop up comes up saying i'm not allowed to. Fixed except the artifcating, its a bug with most backgrounds.

3/8

sorry, but not a chance. Unless it becomes default in official builds, I won't include it. Generally speaking, my userbase should be a little more technically sound considering you have to visit a tech site to even find my builds. They should be able to browse safely without the need of an extension that isn't even enabled by default even when it is built.

3/8

sorry, but not a chance. Unless it becomes default in official builds, I won't include it. Generally speaking, my userbase should be a little more technically sound considering you have to visit a tech site to even find my builds. They should be able to browse safely without the need of an extension that isn't even enabled by default even when it is built.

I'm not saying that I'm less technical, just wanting to play with the new features.

bangbang023, I don't mean to sound rude but for those replies that you just type a few numbers why don't you just update the first post with that? Unless something important (as in 3/8) is to be said, why not just update the number in the first post? Just a suggestion, I don't mean to start an argument :)

bangbang023, I don't mean to sound rude but for those replies that you just type a few numbers why don't you just update the first post with that? Unless something important (as in 3/8) is to be said, why not just update the number in the first post? Just a suggestion, I don't mean to start an argument :)

i update both just so the thread gets bumped and anyone subscribed to it or lookingat the front page will see its been updated. its post count locked so its not like my count goes up.

WHOA its fast! :woot:

I was messing with a 'official' 1.6a1 a couple days ago and it was a negligble improvement in speed.

These optimized builds of yours OWN, please keep it up!

I hesistated to try the 1.6a1 builds until TMP was supporting them. Good news is there is now a dev build out which is working perfectly.

http://tmp.garyr.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t...188ec721f77a1e7

Also I am very happy to say the 'X-Firefox Launcher' (which makes firefox 'portable') is working superb!

http://www.winpenpack.com/launchers.html

WHOA its fast! :woot:

I was messing with a 'official' 1.6a1 a couple days ago and it was a negligble improvement in speed.

These optimized builds of yours OWN, please keep it up!

I hesistated to try the 1.6a1 builds until TMP was supporting them. Good news is there is now a dev build out which is working perfectly.

http://tmp.garyr.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t...188ec721f77a1e7

Also I am very happy to say the 'X-Firefox Launcher' (which makes firefox 'portable') is working superb!

http://www.winpenpack.com/launchers.html

I'm always glad to get a new user who can be just as enthusiastic about this stuff as I am. I'm glad you're enjoying it :)

thats odd...for me the new 1.6a1 is much quicker then 1.5.1

It really varies per system. Some of them will notice my builds and officials have onyl a slightly difference while some will notice a HUGE difference, especially in load time.

Finaly gave your build a try, it does launch a little faster, dont really see any browsing difference though

For browsing differences, it helps to have a slower cpu. Other than that, if you run some online tests (table, javascript, image loading, etc) you would see my builds, or any optimized builds, do excel quite well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.