• 0

The Definitive "BEST FIREWALL" thread


The Definitive "BEST FIREWALL"  

881 members have voted

  1. 1. The Definitive "BEST FIREWALL"

    • Black Ice
      23
    • Kerio/Tiny Personal Firewall
      99
    • Norton Firewall
      108
    • McAfee Firewall
      24
    • Zone Alarm (Pro)
      259
    • Sygate Firewall
      113
    • Outpost
      80
    • Any *nix solution
      35
    • Windows XP Built-In
      66
    • Other
      74


Question

i'm so sick of these threads poping up every single week. so here's the one and only thread you should need untill the end of your life. moderator can modify poll entries to update.

BEST FIREWALL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Information over networks travel both ways, so why not have a firewall that protects both ways also? One case where a virus free person would like outbound protection is preventing server permissions for programs that work without server permissions, like some of those programs with XP/2000 that listen for ports, even though they don't need to (I think one was svhost.exe or something...). More experienced users like the idea of limiting the protocols a program can use, or allowing a program to only have access to a certain amount of IP addresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well then, look at the poll and the ones with the most votes, search for one or two on google, try them out and see which one is right for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
I use hardware: Netgear Firewall/VPN router.

Blocks anything and everything by default, so you have to manually configure ports you want open etc.

Had no problems since I started using it. Logs are scary. Its amazing what people try to get from your network !!

Some of the features are:

Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI) to prevent Denial of Service (DoS) attacks (syn flood, ICMP flood, UDP flood, "ping of death", IP spoofing, land attack, tear drop attack, IP address sweep attack, Win Nuke attack). Intrusion Detection System (IDS) including logging, reporting and e-mail alerts, address service and protocol), Web URL content filtering.

SEight (8) dedicated BPN tunnels, Manual dey and IKE Security Association (SA) assignment, 56-bit (DES) or 168-bit (3DES) IPsec encryption algorithm, MD5 or SHA-1 authentication algorithm, pre-shared key, perfect forward secrecy (Diffie-Helman and Oakley client support), key life and IKE lifetime time settings, prevent replay attack, remote access VPN (client-to-site), site-to-site VPN, IPSec NAT traversal (VPN pass-through).

Network Address Translation (NAT), static routing, unrestricted users per port.

Static IP address assignment, internal DHCP server on LAN, DGCP client on WAN, PPPoE client support.

I think I have the same firewall as you- FVS318? It came with firmware v1.1 installed, and I could only upgrade it to v1.3. The 1.4 firmware seemed corrupt. The web management page had errors that prevented well.. management, and it was flaky all around. Anyone else had that problem?

Otherwise, it's the best $99 I've spent. Having firewall-to-firewall VPN with my partners networks is wonderfully convenient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Currently using Outpost firewall. So far i'm happy, it loads extremely quickly compared to my previous experience of Zone Alarm. Outpost loads so fast, It seems like it starts before Windows does (but I know it doesn't :) . However it seems to be taxing my system rather harshly 34MB. How many does Zone Alarm take?

Outpost reports I have had 0 Attacks since installation and my favortite option, is it allows me to Break any connection across my network at will. I never saw this option in ZA. Basically, it's a bit easier and more clever than my experience with ZA, so i'll stick with it until I find something better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Kaspersky AntiHacker - nice, fast, and all around very secure. Only issues come up with local networks "scanning" tcp/udp ports (which then blocks the connection), and there's no way to add an exception list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I use two firewalls

1) Stygate Personal Firewall - to protect my computers ass

2) Black Ice - to get intruders IP's and post them to my collection of dumbasses who try to h4x0r my computer :cool:

Windows Firewall in XP SP2 is good enough for me.

Are you mad ? Trusting in Microsofts firewall is like trusting in a bitter old lady to watch out for your alchohol, there surely gonna leave ya in the dust. Than you'll be standing or sitting there wondering, oh dear god why did I trust in that lil old lady (Microsoft).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
I use two firewalls

1) Stygate Personal Firewall - to protect my computers ass

2) Black Ice - to get intruders IP's and post them to my collection of dumbasses who try to h4x0r my computer :cool:

Are you mad ? Trusting in Microsofts firewall is like trusting in a bitter old lady to watch out for your alchohol, there surely gonna leave ya in the dust. Than you'll be standing or sitting there wondering, oh dear god why did I trust in that lil old lady (Microsoft).

It's more sensible than giving a sh1t about the output of an IDS in a home environment...... talk about time wasting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hardware firewall is the best solution, nothing compares to their flexibility and ease of use. For monitoring program access to the net zonealarm works.

Does anyone know of any programs that only have program access? not specifically a firewall but just a program accept or decline dialog when something tries to access the internet. Zonealarm is pretty resource hungry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.