• 0

The Definitive "BEST FIREWALL" thread


The Definitive "BEST FIREWALL"  

881 members have voted

  1. 1. The Definitive "BEST FIREWALL"

    • Black Ice
      23
    • Kerio/Tiny Personal Firewall
      99
    • Norton Firewall
      108
    • McAfee Firewall
      24
    • Zone Alarm (Pro)
      259
    • Sygate Firewall
      113
    • Outpost
      80
    • Any *nix solution
      35
    • Windows XP Built-In
      66
    • Other
      74


Question

i'm so sick of these threads poping up every single week. so here's the one and only thread you should need untill the end of your life. moderator can modify poll entries to update.

BEST FIREWALL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

hmm whats a good firewall I can use on a Remote Win2k3 Server? I don't want to try Zonealarm b/c it would lock me out before I would be able to configure it and I also tried installing Kerio but it doesn't support 2K3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Get your butt over to that server and config it or get someone else to do it for you. All you are going to do is lock yourself out if you aren't there configuring it yourself. Common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I''ve been forced to yet again try Zone Alarm and I hate it. Settings are spread out EVERYWHERE and there is bad control over what you really let your program do when you grant it access. I URGE everyone to try out Outpost 2.x pro instead and you will see how superior it is. Very easy to set up and it has pre-configured rules for alot of programs. When you run it in wizard mode it's very easy to let programs only communicate through specified ports as well. You see what processes and programs that are in use and what traffic they are causing individually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Those software firewalls are ok but we have a quite a bnumber of pc's on the network here at home so theres a Zyxel Router & a Zywall Firewall between the Network & the internet.

The Zywall 10 is great it can block incoming & outgoing traffic !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
Get your butt over to that server and config it or get someone else to do it for you. All you are going to do is lock yourself out if you aren't there configuring it yourself. Common sense.

if I could go to Tx sure.... anyways I did try Sygate and it did lock me out but my Server host disabled it so I could access it, but I tried connecting this morning and could not find an icon or control panel for it :| and I reloaded it a couple of times

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Just a thought, didn't bother reading this whole thread, but: the poll loses meaning as newer versions come out and such.

For example, many people are still using KPF 2.15, but that's not evinced in the poll at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

No firewall.

Never had a computer virus/trojan/worm in my life. Never been hacked or exploited. Always keep everything upto date.

I suppose my firewall is either my power button or my rj45 jack.

I'm not saying at all that I'm safe. There are exploits that aren't known yet, or at least known by network security organisations.

If someone was to hack me and succeed, kudos to them. I find them either lucky or knowledgable. I'd just fix my machine and live with it, I have nothing of value or interest on any of my machines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

wow only 6 people voted for mcafee? their latest Mcafee firewall plus is great! easy to use, lots of information (graphs, pie charts, ip tracking, etc), blocks everything.. and even looks nice! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

PCMag gave Mcafee like, a three. ZoneAlarm Pro and Norton got a 5. PCMag tests were a little messed up though, they said that both Norton and ZAP didn't pass the Tooleaky test. I know for a fact they both have protection against it.

I am glad that there isn't a monoculture of firewalls. That in itself makes the internet as a whole more secure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I got a question about my router's (DLink DI-704P) firewall: On the log it has hundrends of lines saying 'Sunday, November 03, 2002 7:11:08 PM Unrecognized access from 62.25.99.20:80 to TCP port 5065' (every line is a differenct port and a different ip).

Does it mean that the firewall blocked it?

Thanks

BTW, don't pay attention to the date because I never took the time to set it right.

Edited by PlagueWielder3k
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

i've fallen in love with Outpost.

easy to configure/set up, it registers as "stealthed" on damn near every test i've run on it so far, and it doesn't kill my ISP connection like zonealarm did, even after i spent two months and countless hours in the ZA forums trying to get it properly configured.

i'd like to retract my previous ZA vote and put it towards Outpost 2.x :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
i've fallen in love with Outpost.

easy to configure/set up, it registers as "stealthed" on damn near every test i've run on it so far, and it doesn't kill my ISP connection like zonealarm did, even after i spent two months and countless hours in the ZA forums trying to get it properly configured.

i'd like to retract my previous ZA vote and put it towards Outpost 2.x :p

I just installed Outpost and went to Shields up to test it. Pratically all ports are closed and only 3 stealth. It said it failed. I don't know what I'm doing wrong when I configure it. All I have done is allow the programs which need access like IE, Firfox, email,WMP, etc...

What am I doing wrong ?

thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Right, I just unistalled my firewall. Went back to shields up to see what results I would get with no firewall, windows xp firewall is not on either btw. I get the exact same results plus this result from another test. I am using a router to connect my computer wireless so has that got something to do with it. Here is what result I got for the other test.

"Attempting connection to your computer. . .

Shields UP! is now attempting to contact the Hidden Internet Server within your PC. It is likely that no one has told you that your own personal computer may now be functioning as an Internet Server with neither your knowledge nor your permission. And that it may be serving up all or many of your personal files for reading, writing, modification and even deletion by anyone, anywhere, on the Internet!

Your Internet port 139 does not appear to exist!

One or more ports on this system are operating in FULL STEALTH MODE! Standard Internet behavior requires port connection attempts to be answered with a success or refusal response. Therefore, only an attempt to connect to a nonexistent computer results in no response of either kind. But YOUR computer has DELIBERATELY CHOSEN NOT TO RESPOND (that's very cool!) which represents advanced computer and port stealthing capabilities. A machine configured in this fashion is well hardened to Internet NetBIOS attack and intrusion.

Unable to connect with NetBIOS to your computer.

All attempts to get any information from your computer have FAILED. (This is very uncommon for a Windows networking-based PC.) Relative to vulnerabilities from Windows networking, this computer appears to be VERY SECURE since it is NOT exposing ANY of its internal NetBIOS networking protocol over the Internet."

So I don't need a firewall because I'm using a router ?

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
I just installed Outpost and went to Shields up to test it. Pratically all ports are closed and only 3 stealth. It said it failed. I don't know what I'm doing wrong when I configure it. All I have done is allow the programs which need access like IE, Firfox, email,WMP, etc...

What am I doing wrong ?

thanks.

i got an all-stealthed rating there, and all i did was tell it to apply the pre-set program rules, pre-set isp rules and then changed just a few things (not letting some windows system files connect to the web - explorer.exe doesn't need 'net access) - i don't think i did anything too special

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I worked with some WinXP computers and found that explorer.exe needs access, or you will not be able to view web pages with any browser. SVCHOST.exe also needs access, but I found I could restrict it by only giving it access to localhost,trusted zone, the DNS servers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.