EduardValencia Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 this is half of the work,it's an alpha kit -duh- when the product is totally finished it will look way better of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icecaveman Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 I have all the Silent Hill games on the PS2. I don't get your flat face remark because none of their faces look flat at all. Silent Hill games probably have the best looking character renders.With these screenshots, the texturing looks crappy. It's like everything is plasticized and smoothed. 586199087[/snapback] That's because you must artificially recreate everything to make a realistic high quality models today, in the old days of low quality models you would just take a photo of someone and strech it to the model, these days are over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black.ops Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 this is half of the work,it's an alpha kit -duh- when the product is totally finished it will look way better of course 586199125[/snapback] Read my post above: IT WILL LOOK THE SAME, JUST RUN FASTER. Of course, that only applies if they don't redo all the graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laughing-Man Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 you would just take a photo of someone and strech it to the model586199122[/snapback] That is exactly how I would describe the texturing on these models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iconboy Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 BTW iconboy here is an easy read for you... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_mapping 586199075[/snapback] wow, you a real ass. anyways you can throw terminology at me til your blue in the face, doesnt change the fact that those screenshots look like crap TO ME. and if you didnt understand the above, you can also use IN MY HUMBLE OPINION Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b mitchell Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Dont make me puke... this is NOT next-gen quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laughing-Man Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Dude you even know what you are talking about? You are so silly you have to see never games in action to see what they are all about, screenshots don't justify anymore since the light sources are constantly changing, unlike the PS2 era and you see lot of the facial features reflect that and shade correctly considering where the light source comes from. It has FAR higher polygon count and is far more detailed than a simple texture added to a very low polygon model, you know how ugly the PS2 models look at different angles? 586199045[/snapback] The uglies at different angles, this game is unplayable! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumiplaty Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 These aren't 360 shots, they're Segas new arcade board. It uses a totally different graphics chip. It might not have anything to do with 360s hardware. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eminem213486 Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 These aren't 360 shots, they're Segas new arcade board. It uses a totally different graphics chip. It might not have anything to do with 360s hardware. 586199380[/snapback] true, topic should be closed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzla Veteran Posted July 12, 2005 Veteran Share Posted July 12, 2005 Where did you get the information about which is on an alpha kit and which is on a beta kit? Because I've seen these 6 screenshots posted on loads of different sites and forums and there was do distinction between the two. The place where these images are hosted make no seperation as well: http://www.videogameslife.com/images/gallery.asp?id=1694 Just interested is all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanky Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 They do look nice and are next gen but i'm sure that 80% of next gen games will look a heck of alot better. Disapointing IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hobblyhoy Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 The Following picture is House of Dead 3 on Xbox, see the difference? 586198937[/snapback] Thats because the xbox version was ported from the dreamcast and the dreamcast was ported from the arcade. /shudder* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheshire Cat Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 The Following picture is House of Dead 3 on Xbox, see the difference? 586198937[/snapback] i have a dreamcast with house of the dead 2 and that bit is right from the beginning, only difference i can see is the bikes on the left were not there on the dreamcast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/Austin Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 looks better than HOD 3 but the graphics still suck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincent Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 (N) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kylejn Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 i have a dreamcast with house of the dead 2 and that bit is right from the beginning, only difference i can see is the bikes on the left were not there on the dreamcast 586200275[/snapback] Haha, yeah, that SS is HOTD 2. Dunno what the original poster was smoking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeSoul Posted July 12, 2005 Author Share Posted July 12, 2005 Haha, yeah, that SS is HOTD 2. Dunno what the original poster was smoking. 586202576[/snapback] http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/houseo...creenindex.html this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerm Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 jmole you really have to learn about how 3D works dude... If you see the PS2 version then the face is pretty flat and it has no bump mapping like you see on the x360 version, that really makes difference when you see light sources running around. Sure it could look aLOT better but it's just another brain-dead zombie game, they are not supposed to spend to much on creating them even if id belives in that crap. 586199019[/snapback] I don't care about whether it's bump-mapped or how many pixels it has, or what blablablabl, the PS2 screeny looks ALOT better than that Xbox360 screeny. End of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeSoul Posted July 12, 2005 Author Share Posted July 12, 2005 The uglies at different angles, this game is unplayable! 586199174[/snapback] nice try with posting a rendered video from silent hill 3, its evident with the black bars top and bottom, what i posted were ingame pics of the game a year ahead of launch. so basically either you didnt know it was rendered video from the game or you lied. you decide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriz Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Not the best ive seen, but good anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Montage Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Hmmm, expected more, but that said I will wait to see it in action before I give praise or criticism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzla Veteran Posted July 12, 2005 Veteran Share Posted July 12, 2005 So, Beta/Alpha? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.KICK Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 I hope they fix the fingers on the zombies, they look like paper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icecaveman Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 I don't care about whether it's bump-mapped or how many pixels it has, or what blablablabl, the PS2 screeny looks ALOT better than that Xbox360 screeny.End of. 586202585[/snapback] You won't be seing screenshots while you are playing but fine with me, live in your dream world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeSoul Posted July 12, 2005 Author Share Posted July 12, 2005 So, Beta/Alpha? 586202684[/snapback] The top ones look alpha the bottom look beta, thats my assumption but looking at beyond3d and teamxbox they are both saying this is using the Chiro 360 board which Sega will use for thier Arcade games so the screens are arcade shots, I just posted what Videogameslife said that it was xbox 360 shots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts