Rob2687 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Is anyone getting high CPU usage when you're dragging windows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomFel Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 yea seriously, how much ram do you have to be running 79 processes? and pagefile setting? 586396205[/snapback] 2gb ddr2 (it's a laptop). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eNeon Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 do you mean objectbar or objectdock? ObjectDock murders my games, so I launch them from a batch file that shuts down object dock, runs my game, and then restarts OD once the game is exited. 586398709[/snapback] I mean Objectbar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Hiroshi- Posted August 19, 2005 Author Share Posted August 19, 2005 I mean Objectbar. 586401119[/snapback] I remember only needing to use objectbar to get the "Windows Whistler" look, back in '00, or that Mac OS-X look on Windows 2000.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vf- Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 (edited) Also remember that with any skin, WB or msstyle, the more gfx intense it, the memory it will use.So say the theme I use, extensis, which is a nice minimal theme only takes about 440K. But when you load a gfx intense theme such KoL's 5203 longhorn or the MyHomestead theme it will cause wbload to go up. In the grand scheme of things though wbload at 2.5 MB is still very low compared to the default XP engine that can take aware from 5-15 depending on the persons computer setup. What I don't get is why people fret over 2MB anyways when most computers come standard now with 512. Also hyperpaint only works on gfx cards that support hardware acceleration. On my old laptop, the p3 700 doesn't support hyperpaint, but I don't get a performane hit at all. 586398838[/snapback] Just as an example, I had a personal port of Alunamin for WB and it only uses 404kb or most of the time but thats mainly due to things like the majority of the skin is bitmap. Memory and slowdowns creeps up with lots of things I've found if there is lots of streching in the skin or *.TGA used in places where it doesn't need to but thats down to the skinner not WindowBlinds. I don't understand why people are whining over 2mb either... you never see these sort of conversations of people bitching at games taking 600 or so MB or the likes of Photoshop. Memory isn't meant to look pretty while we all brag how much memory we have free! The sad thing is I cannot believe to this day people are still whining about memory problems like the times of 2000/01, it feels like groundhog day. Oh noes I just used 2% CPU while typing this PANIC PANIC! :p Too many freakin posers with this memory subject :) You know to this day I don't think I've ran hyperpaint... oh wait I did once on a GeForce3. I just haven't run it since then but it never slows me down nor in Photoshop. Edited August 19, 2005 by V_F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zxian Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 2gb ddr2 (it's a laptop).586401048[/snapback] And I thought I had a fair amount with 1GB in my laptop... :pThanks for the HyperPaint tip people! It helps a lot! :) I couldn't say anything about gaming though... I don't use WB on my desktop computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metal_dragen Veteran Posted August 21, 2005 Veteran Share Posted August 21, 2005 Also remember that with any skin, WB or msstyle, the more gfx intense it, the memory it will use.So say the theme I use, extensis, which is a nice minimal theme only takes about 440K. But when you load a gfx intense theme such KoL's 5203 longhorn or the MyHomestead theme it will cause wbload to go up. In the grand scheme of things though wbload at 2.5 MB is still very low compared to the default XP engine that can take aware from 5-15 depending on the persons computer setup. 586398838[/snapback] I'm running KoL's 5203 theme on 4.6 with the glow effects enabled and wbload.exe still only takes up 908kb. :ninja: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feverfive Posted August 21, 2005 Share Posted August 21, 2005 I'm running KoL's 5203 theme on 4.6 with the glow effects enabled and wbload.exe still only takes up 908kb. :ninja: 586408568[/snapback] Huh, I also use LH 5203 w/ WB 4.6, but it takes up 2,900K on my machine.....Not complaining as I have 2GB of physical memory, and it looks great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frogboy Administrators Posted August 21, 2005 Administrators Share Posted August 21, 2005 Well I am biased of course but my main day job is working on games and we all run WindowBlinds full-time. http://www.galciv2.com is what we're currently working on. If WB slowed down our computers, we wouldn't be running it. We need every cycle we can get, especially when debugging. I don't run msstyles anymore because I do notice the speed it with them, particularly on resize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neksus Posted August 23, 2005 Share Posted August 23, 2005 I must say that using WindowBlinds themes does NOT slow down my system! Not one bit! I have these Stardock apps running without it hitting my game performance: Natural Desktop ObjectDockPlus WindowBlinds 3 different DesktopX widgets CursorXP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thornz0 Posted August 26, 2005 Share Posted August 26, 2005 running Kol's latest wb work, Fresco. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoL Veteran Posted August 26, 2005 Veteran Share Posted August 26, 2005 I dont see any different between msstyles and windowblinds skins. Right now Im using my Fresco WB skin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatestfall Posted August 26, 2005 Share Posted August 26, 2005 i really need that extensis skin.. lol.. the download link is dead... anyways, i'm using a skinstudio port of xpmc rc3 and its using about 1.5mb in VM and only 1mb in regular memory.. usually its only 682k or so. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Woodbridge Subscriber² Posted August 26, 2005 Subscriber² Share Posted August 26, 2005 Extensis for WB if that is what you are after http://woodbridge.wincustomize.com/viewski...D=44&UID=252102 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guru Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 does skin studio convert msstyles ro wb format optimally? I had explorer windows lagging with 1.3 mb wbskin [dir and not zip file] with hyper paint enabled. no shell animations, no shellstyle etc all removed in stylestudio what am i doing wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guru Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 common guys someones gotta know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReDwAvE Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 Yea SkinStudio convert msstyles to wb format, even SkinStudio free edition does it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Caveman Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Also hyperpaint only works on gfx cards that support hardware acceleration. On my old laptop, the p3 700 doesn't support hyperpaint, but I don't get a performane hit at all. 586398838[/snapback] Does a Radeon 9250 not support Hyperpaint? .. cause I can't enable it at all. Its blacked out and won't let me checkmark the box. Anyone got any clue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meshuggah Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Well first time I get to say this, but it's true.... WB 4.6 is faster than .msstyles Using 1,280k although it doesnt matter to me, with Hyperpaint enabled fully it's running great. Not to mention I'm using KoL's theme with his glow effects.... :D for once I gotta admit....it's better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts