Google Instant Messenger? $100 Laptop?


Recommended Posts

We don't need another IM!

586416463[/snapback]

It's (rumored to be) based on Jabber, so it's not "another" IM.
What would their OS be based on?

586416463[/snapback]

Um, other than some very wild rumors, who said Google was going to offer an OS? No one except maybe a few people at Google know what the OS would be based on.
It might be just my computer that does this but when i type http://whatever.google.com it says it doesn't exist, but if i type http://talk.google.com it redirects me to googles own 404 page saying google.com/talk/ was no found on this server  :blink:

586416778[/snapback]

:o Interesting, you may be on to something there...

About talk.google.com, good guess. Look my Trillian connection log:

[23:35:46] *** Creating connection "tomservo@talk.google.com/Trillian"

[23:35:47] *** Server supports TLS encryption...

[23:35:47] *** Negotiating XMPP SSL connection...

[23:35:48] *** Connection established using EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (TLSv1/SSLv3)

[23:35:56] *** ERROR: iq error 405

[23:35:57] *** Connect: Account failure.

it would be great for MS to have some real competition, google could do that. i twould encourage microsoft to make a better product(s). say what you want apple fans, but microsoft doesnt worry a whole lot about macs right now, they can prettimuch do whatever they feel.

About talk.google.com, good guess. Look my Trillian connection log:

586416971[/snapback]

Very good find.

The problem is going to be getting enough people to want to use Google IM. I'm very happy using AIM for my friends and MSN for Neowin staff. How are they going to convince everyone to change over? What's going to be their selling point? That's what interests me. As it was stated, you need to have people on the network for it to entice other people. That's one of the main reasons YIM is so far behind the other clients in terms of general useage. No one knows anyone on it and therefore sees no need in using it.

They might offer transports to those services. But to have them look attractive, the Google IM client has to expose an user-friendly transport configuration interface.

Also, I've just remembered that the XMPP RFCs allow for your own SASL authentification mechanisms. So it might be possible, that even if Google uses Jabber for their potential IM services, that they might lock you into Google IM via proprietary SASL, if you want to use their service.

--edit:

As a sidenote, their XMPP server doesn't respond to the checkLogin IQ as supposed. Instead of replying with 403-Forbidden or telling the client whether it wants a plaintext password or a digest, it just tells straight away that it doesn't support plaintext. Whatever that means, probably their way keeping the service locked down until Wednesday.

Edited by Tom Servo
This topic is now closed to further replies.