Recommended Posts

Couldn't see that coming from a mile away. Hell if it were between poking both your eyes out or using firefox you'd be blind tomorrow.

Anyway, use whatever browser you want to use. Most compatablity? you probably visit different sites that us, different sites have different compatability. Handy features? Try each, my personal opinions on why I like firefox isn't going to be the same as yours. You may hate the features of firefox. Nobody is going to be able to answer which one you are going to like more except for yourself.

Some one get this guy a medal! Thats what I try to tell people and I get the whole "well <insert browser name here> is better" crap over and over again.

I prefer Maxthon.

List of features I really like:

+Great implementation of tabs (and very customizable, you can even put them at the bottom)

+Tray icon is very useful.

+Super drag 'n' drop

+autohide sidebar

+RSS sidebar is the best and most useful implementation of RSS I've seen in any browser, it even plays podcasts.

+There are also plenty of really nice and useful plugins available for Maxthon. There is even a plugin to check if all your plugins are up to date.

+Also can save your current session and open it again when you start maxthon, and if Maxthon crashes it can still open your previous session. You can also save groups of windows which is often useful.

+Undo button can re-open a tab if you accidentally close it.

+Great compatability with IE.

How many of those features does firefox have?

opera or firefox for me i will never use IE unless for windows update or windows live mal or any microsoft specific site, i dun use maxthon because its just IE rebranded or we can say IE skin or frontend.

IE its proven to be very insecure and easy to gt spywares (not a big problem for me but for my family is it)

I've been trying to get Firefox up to Maxthon's speed, but it just can't compare. I tried loading an InvisionFree board in both to test (probably not the most accurate test, but couldn't find anything else). IE and Maxthon loaded in ~.01 seconds and Firefox took ~.05. Might not seem like a long time for Firefox, but it seems so slow after using Maxthon. I used to lecture about how FF is so much faster than IE, but Maxthon just loaded a lot faster. And after I just tried it in IE, it's even faster than Maxthon (it takes about .007 seconds for the same page). No, I won't go back to IE, because of it's lack of useful features, but Maxthon seems just right. According to this test (again, not the most accurate, perhaps, but still demonstrates the point), IE is 30% faster than Maxthon, although the difference isn't that noticable. However, Maxthon is 400% faster than Firefox.

*shrug* Maybe my comp is just screwed up for Firefox.

EDIT: Just retryed that page in Firefox; only takes .02-.03 seconds. I may switch back, since I did try optimizing Firefox for better performance. I doubt it will be as fast as IE/Maxthon, but Firefox does have better features and interface (although Maxthon also has some useful features that Firefox lacks). I'm not trying to be biased, just trying to find the best.

EDIT2: Ran this test: http://nontroppo.org/timer/ . Maxthon loads double or triple the speed of Firefox for each attribute. IE loads about 1/3 faster than Maxthon. About the same results as the InvisionFree board test.

Edited by chrislee149

unlucky, it is true, FF is slower than IE/Opera/Maxthon..

i use phpmyadmin on my website, 84 tables, and Opera is the fastest to display all, IE/Maxthon next, and FF is just taking too long, really too long, and too much cpu...

The only problem of switching away from FF is the adblock, none of them have a good adblock as firefox :( like the obj-tags...

Standards compliance is an illusion, the only standards that count are the ones webmasters follow, for which Maxthon/IE is better.

...

Now, i hear this a lot, and it doesn't really make sense to me. the problem is web-masters don't follow many standards, and tag soup isn't really a standard (and as such, IE can screw up on tag soup just as much as any other browser can), and even as MS move towards making IE a standards compliant browser, i still keep hearing this argument brought up in support of old IE (6 and lower), when it only means IE has a better tag soup parser.

Also, I don't think quirks mode is being updated any more (good thing, if they want to use new features, make it valid), as all enhancements i am hearing of from the IE Team only mention strict mode.

And when you think about it, only old, old pages would exhibit any problems moving forward, as most new sites are designed to work with standards compliant engines (e.g. Trident in IE7, Gecko, Presto, WebKit, etc.)

You forgot Mozilla, FF is slower than Mozilla as well. The whole FF is faster than anything is a Myth.

Of course you'd say so, given how you present anything and everything about Firefox in a negative light, without any evidence to support your claims. Your unfounded opinions are not facts, either.

Approaching 50 million downloads too. Even if you discard half of those for re-downloads etc, that's still a large download count.

Actually the download could be 3 or 4 times of this. It is extremely popular in China and tops all browser download in every Chinese download site (several dozens). Just 4 or 5 more popular unofficial Chinese download sites would already exceed the official number. :)

Of course you'd say so, given how you present anything and everything about Firefox in a negative light, without any evidence to support your claims. Your unfounded opinions are not facts, either.

What? Did you read my page and the Sources? I have all the evidence here.

Don't try to spin things when you know I have evidence for EVERYTHING I claim.

What? Did you read my page and the Sources? I have all the evidence here.

Don't try to spin things when you know I have evidence for EVERYTHING I claim.

How is this evidence? Browser statistics were determined using set hardware. The results could (and likely would) be different with varying types of hardware. Besides, according to this, only Firefox 1.5 Beta 2 was tested. I'm not saying 1.5 Final or 1.5.0.1 would be blazingly fast by comparison to Beta 2, but what you presented as evidence is nothing but conjecture.

Just unzip the folder from the .zip file to the plugins folder in the Maxthon directory. If you want to know what plugins you have installed, go to Options > Maxthon Options > Plugin.

As for what is the most useful plugins, only you can decide that. But I have found the Plugin Manager, More Options and BB Codes to be the most popular in my setup.

Just have a look at the Plugin Forum and the Plugin Database.

I prefer Maxthon.

List of features I really like:

+Great implementation of tabs (and very customizable, you can even put them at the bottom)

+Tray icon is very useful.

+Super drag 'n' drop

+autohide sidebar

+RSS sidebar is the best and most useful implementation of RSS I've seen in any browser, it even plays podcasts.

+There are also plenty of really nice and useful plugins available for Maxthon. There is even a plugin to check if all your plugins are up to date.

+Also can save your current session and open it again when you start maxthon, and if Maxthon crashes it can still open your previous session. You can also save groups of windows which is often useful.

+Undo button can re-open a tab if you accidentally close it.

+Great compatability with IE.

How many of those features does firefox have?

All of them. There is no feature listed here that either my firefox does not already do, or cannot easily do.

But yeah, choose what you like best and such... oh, and don't listen to Mastertech. He doesn't know what he's talking about. I've seen Firefox slower than IE on some machines, and faster than IE on other machines. The two are about the same as far as rendering speed on my machine.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.