Recommended Posts

Is this build a bit more usable on a pc with 288MB Ram (P3 1.4Ghz, SDRam PC133, Riva TNT2, but i don't care about the blingbling stuff like Aero)

It may run but you'd need at least 512 MB and that's absolute bare minimum, 1 GB for optimal performance but even then you should probably just not bother with it.

My desktop still has beta 2 on it...mainly since I've been out of town on business for 5 weeks. However I'll be installing this build when I get home next week. Pulling it off connect right now courtesy of my hotel's free wireless :)

Why? His processor is a few generations old.

Processor rating shouldn't be by generations, but instead by performance.

No one here is going to say that a P4 Prescott @ 2.4Ghz is the same as a P4 Northwood @ 2.4Ghz. The Northwood trashes the Prescott clock for clock but it's the older of the 2.

My general impression...I am very impressed. It just keeps getting faster (Y)

Overall definitely more responsive, quicker boot/shutdown, media center looks a lot more polished (also a lot more responsive), I like the new RSS widget and the new weather widget, ...I am just quite happy with this build.

Off to explore a bit more.

I like the new RSS widget and the new weather widget

All of which are available now for XP......... :rolleyes:

Cosmetics!!

I can see nothing in VISTA that makes me want to switch?.........seriously.......I cant believe all the 'hype' surrounding this OS!

It does nothing I cant do today! (there's my Microcrap catchphrase)

;)

I've installed it as well. Glass seems to be default set to be a bit more blueish... Now I have to figure out why my network connection is so flakey on this build... I can get to some sites, but not others...

This build took me just under 24minutes to install. A major improvement over 5472

I'd say its gone more turquoise.

wow...you must use both wordpad and the add font dialog quite a bit to care that much

One would assume that if one wished to add a font, they would have simply dragged and dropped the fonts into the font folder rather than using a convoluted add-font dialogue.

Resizing is STILL slow and ugly. I don't understand how they can accept black bars to show when you resize things like media player or white bars when you resize other windows like windows explorer. And the flickering that happens when you resize windows like windows dvd maker!

I can see nothing in VISTA that makes me want to switch?.........seriously.......I cant believe all the 'hype' surrounding this OS!

For someone complaining about cosmetics, you sure make a big deal about not "seeing" the things you want in Vista ;). What ARE you looking for? New built-in applications? Animations? Or a whole new way of working with windows?

Is the increased security not worth the switch? The increased performance in window handling? New audio and network stacks for increased performance?

He he... I've been bitching about that for ages. :whistle:

Anyone tried this on a ASRock 939Dual yet? Does the networking work?????

I'm about to install it and let you know, but off hand I can tell you that on the previous build, much like your experience, networking did not work for me, with either XP drivers or the Vista drivers off the ULI Integrated 2.20 drivers, but if you put your system on standby and then bring it back from standby, my router is recognized and the computer connects to the internet.

It probably sends some sort of wake up signal to the PCI devices and it's doing the trick for now. Yes it's a pain, but I'm not using Vista as my main OS anyway right now. Either way, NIC cards you can get for $10-20 and they work with standard network chipsets which have generic drivers available for every OS.

You do realise that Apple recycled a lot of icons from Mac OS 1 through to Mac OS 9.2 right?

Apple had redone the whole interface for Mac OS X because they had scrapped the whole code base from Mac OS 9.2 and started on a clean slate, and moved to a Unix-based OS. Since they had to recompile everything anyway, they had the chance to refresh everything. Unlike Microsoft who are only modifying their previous versions of Windows.

Even that is a bit of an exagguration; they replaced the DisplayPostscript with Display PDF; they took out the 'manual management' pieces from Classic and renamed it carbon; alot of crap that is in MacOS X is merely a rehash of what was already in NeXT Step, except changed around a bit to fit into the whole "Mac way of doing things".

The first version of MacOS X was merely Darwin + DisplayPost script with a desktop written in Cocoa using many parts of from NeXT Step:

Macosxserver1.png

So now that they've updated the icons in the Control Panel, we're bitching about the other 2 old things? :blink:

This from the same people that said MS wouldn't fix the icons in the CP. :rolleyes:

Na, the assumption is this; if there are 2 visible things that haven't been fixed/updated, there must be more around in Windows that could cause problems at a later date.

To which I said; Microsoft is a big multinational company, their focus is on improving the important things of Windows - the guts of it, the kernel, the API's, the drivers - all those important things, on their 'give a **** o metre' , a font dialogue and wordpad/notepad rank pretty low on it.

Oh, and btw, Services for UNIX is available in Windows Vista Ultimate, it is a full first class citizen next to win32, so there is no performance issues, so all those notepad whiners, you can scoot off to use Vi, which has been around for 25+ years :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.