Italian court: Downloading OK if not for profit


Recommended Posts

MILAN, Italy - Italy's top criminal court has ruled that downloading music, movies and software over the Internet isn't a crime if profit wasn't the motivation, though analysts questioned Monday whether the ruling would have much effect on copyright laws.The court's decision, issued earlier this month but reported over the weekend by the Italian media, overturns earlier convictions against two former Turin Polytechnic Institute students who set up in 1994 a peer-to-peer, file-sharing network that was shut down within months.

They were found guilty of illegal duplication and given a one-year sentence, which was reduced to three months on appeal, defense lawyer Carlo Blengino said.

The top criminal court in Rome threw out the convictions, ruling that it was not a crime to download computer files from such networks if there was no financial gain.

But analysts said violating a copyright, for example by breaking copy-protection technologies in place, remained illegal even if downloading the material had been decriminalized.

"I consider this sentence as a very intermediate step in clarifying what is legal and what is not legal," said analyst Carlo Alberto Carnevale Maffe, the president of Assodigitale, a think-tank on digital technology. "This sentence marks an important step in that peer-to-peer per se is not an illegal activity. What stays and remains illegal is copyright infringement by cracking copyright files, and distributing it for commercial purposes."

That could cover services that charge access or connectivity fees, he said.

The Italian agency that monitors copyright issues, known by the acronym SIAE, said in a statement that the ruling did not bring any "revolutions" in terms of author's rights because the case predates current legislation calling for a fine for anyone who shares protected material over the Internet, even without financial gain.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16756121/

It should be like this anyway, the companies don't loose any money from a guy downloading a movie/song/app, but they do if the guy starts selling it for profit.

Well thats not strictly true is it? If you download a film/app/game/song etc.... you aren't going to be then going out and buying it therefore, the company/artist etc.. are losing out by you not paying for it.

Well thats not strictly true is it? If you download a film/app/game/song etc.... you aren't going to be then going out and buying it therefore, the company/artist etc.. are losing out by you not paying for it.

It's not always a given, the person might hate it and delete it and not buy it, or they might love it and buy the album/app/etc.

I know i have found new artists and such via last.fm (they offer full length previews and free downloads), and stuff like that has made me money on albums i normally wouldn't buy.

It's not always a given, the person might hate it and delete it and not buy it, or they might love it and buy the album/app/etc.

I know i have found new artists and such via last.fm (they offer full length previews and free downloads), and stuff like that has made me money on albums i normally wouldn't buy.

Maybe but I would imagine that the majority of downloaders have no intention of making a purchase - they download stuff as an alternative to spending money. I suppose that it depends on the type of material, pirated games for instance are now hard or impossible to play online due to serial number validation etc... applications are going that way aswell. Music and films are different in that they can be watched/listened to as many times as you like without needing any form of activation etc...

Well I wonder what the cash cow a.k.a. European Union will have to say about it.

If something is downloaded, it may have not been installed, if it is installed, as long as not used to profit then the tax payers money should not be used to fight such actions.

It should be upto the authors to take action not thir parties.

Maybe but I would imagine that the majority of downloaders have no intention of making a purchase - they download stuff as an alternative to spending money. I suppose that it depends on the type of material, pirated games for instance are now hard or impossible to play online due to serial number validation etc... applications are going that way aswell. Music and films are different in that they can be watched/listened to as many times as you like without needing any form of activation etc...

According to the article, they can be given a fine, it just isn't criminal. Like a traffic violation. Its more realistic anyway.

Well thats not strictly true is it? If you download a film/app/game/song etc.... you aren't going to be then going out and buying it therefore, the company/artist etc.. are losing out by you not paying for it.

I know that many times, people who download music would have had no intention of purchasing it in the first place. I might download song X, and listen to it and enjoy it - but if I hadn't downloaded it, I wouldn't have purchased it either.

Therefore, how are they losing any money? The only thing that comes out of these particular situations is greater reach by the artist.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.