ViperAFK Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 pretty glitchy, won't even play any of my songs Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/543540-songbird-025-final/page/2/#findComment-588374956 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Techno_Funky Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 If you were to consider the overhead of the sql database and web browsing capabilities of songbird then I think it would look more reasonable. Afterall opera.exe is using 70MB on its own! Plus songbird hasn't even reached 1.0 yet - its still in its infancy whereas wmp is a mature product. I am a long-standing user of foobar2000 but I must admit this looks interesting. What is your experience using the software like? Havent really used it for long ,but looks more like an itunes clone ,the browser is a nice idea although i would still stick to a standalone browser. In the end i would still stick to WMP11 or Winamp. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/543540-songbird-025-final/page/2/#findComment-588375359 Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Neo Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Songbird must be one of the most hideous applications on Mac OS X. Slow as hell too. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/543540-songbird-025-final/page/2/#findComment-588376813 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts