Guy Fawkes Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 I cant say much more at this point now that i am under nda, but the stats speak for themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 NienorGT Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Ok... it's possible to have 129% CPU usage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 MasterC Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Ok... it's possible to have 129% CPU usage? Probably a dual core setup. Each core can have 100%, so two would have 200%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 User6060 Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Snapped before NDA but posted after :p Maybe the 129% is including CPU+GPU usuage :blink: looks pretty good, but the scene is getting crowded with formats...not that i think the current ones are perfect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Dazzla Veteran Posted March 9, 2007 Veteran Share Posted March 9, 2007 Or maybe there was frames dropped whilst utilising 100% of the CPU and they worked out the CPU requirement of a 1.8GHz AMD64 for that codec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guy Fawkes Posted March 9, 2007 Author Share Posted March 9, 2007 Or maybe there was frames dropped whilst utilising 100% of the CPU and they worked out the CPU requirement of a 1.8GHz AMD64 for that codec. That is correct. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Rudy Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 looks pretty good, can't wait to see how it compare quality wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Sheppard Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Ill believe it when i see it, there have been many codecs that claimed to be better than the rest. Nothing can touch H.264 at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guy Fawkes Posted March 10, 2007 Author Share Posted March 10, 2007 Investor Information. Well this may answer a few more of your questions. The benchmarks for Fairchild were based on converting a raw feed, into a live stream, with the snowstorm, and frostbite overhead included in the data rate. The codec is still alpha as there a few issues to iron out, but macroblocking eliminated, and the comparisons are for equal picture quality, by roughly the same standards as university of moscow uses. I am under nda, so anything more such as how exactly we achieve this in detail , unfortuneately can't be discussed, but i will answer questions, now that I have some leeway in regard to disclosing information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Guy Fawkes
I cant say much more at this point now that i am under nda, but the stats speak for themselves.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
8 answers to this question
Recommended Posts