apul Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 foobar2000 v0.9.4.3 beta Download - size 1.6MB Change Log What's new in 0.9.4.3 beta: * Fixed multiple bugs in ReplayGain Scanner * Musepack decoding bug fixes * Fixed a rare crash in the Properties dialog * Fixed bugs in File Types preferences page View: Homepage | Beta versions Source: Hydrogenaudio Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangbang023 Veteran Posted April 15, 2007 Veteran Share Posted April 15, 2007 I love foobar but the author is either swamped with his personal life or doesn't care much about the project anymore. Development has really slowed down recently. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588480453 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Futurix Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Bangbang023, development of foobar2000 always was erratic - first author releases quickly a bunch of updates, then half year wait, then again quick releases. It was the same between 0.7 and 0.8, between 0.8 and 0.9, and I expect it to be the same now - and with future 1.0 :rolleyes: Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588480636 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangbang023 Veteran Posted April 15, 2007 Veteran Share Posted April 15, 2007 It's just, disappointing, I guess. I started on the internet with my own connection in, what, 99, 2000ish and there was always exciting media player development to follow. Winamp, QCD, Sonique, etc and everything seems stagnant now. I like how foobar2000 gives me power to customize while still using the default Windows interface, but man, I hope he has something big planned. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588480652 Share on other sites More sharing options...
guru Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 ^^ honestly i cant see how Foobar could be better. everything you want is either in it or there is plugin Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588482980 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangbang023 Veteran Posted April 16, 2007 Veteran Share Posted April 16, 2007 ^^honestly i cant see how Foobar could be better. everything you want is either in it or there is plugin Personally, I'd love to see software take advantage of WPF and include functionality and visual appeal. Vista is here and this would be a huge advantage to the first team to get a pretty/functional app out the door enhanced for the OS. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588483298 Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceBrewedBeer Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 I'd have to agree with bangbang023. I'd like to see better OS integration with Vista. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588483327 Share on other sites More sharing options...
.AlleymaN Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 I doubt the developer is interested in prettying up the app natively. Foobar would lose its low memory advantage once it becomes more graphical. On the other hand, the plug ins that are responsible for customization can upgrade to Vista's standards. Also, building a native WPF app would leave users of older OSes in the dark right? Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588483355 Share on other sites More sharing options...
csabo2 Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Good news, I rarely upgrade though, it does everything i want it too. And everytime i upgrade, it wipes out my config. And even backing it up, i've had things break.. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588483365 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangbang023 Veteran Posted April 16, 2007 Veteran Share Posted April 16, 2007 I doubt the developer is interested in prettying up the app natively. Foobar would lose its low memory advantage once it becomes more graphical. On the other hand, the plug ins that are responsible for customization can upgrade to Vista's standards.Also, building a native WPF app would leave users of older OSes in the dark right? Yes, it would leave them in the dark, but the same happened with XP development and 9x users being left in the dark, though it, admittedly, happened later down the line. While I don't see foobar being the application to do it, I'm anxious for WPF support and use. This is where the visual appeal of Vista over, say, a themed XP install is suppsoed to shine through. My comments, in general, were aimed at the media player market, as a whole. There's been little innovation, as of late, and it bugs me. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588483443 Share on other sites More sharing options...
iOsiris Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Personally, I'd love to see software take advantage of WPF and include functionality and visual appeal. Vista is here and this would be a huge advantage to the first team to get a pretty/functional app out the door enhanced for the OS. That will probably never happened with Foobar, it goes against like the core concepts of FB2K or something lol.. But perhaps a 3rd party plugin developer may make those dreams come true as that has happened in the past Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588483583 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toology Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 I'm in no need of a bug fix or a radical new feature so I'm personally content with the pace of development. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553829-foobar2000-v0943-beta/#findComment-588483631 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts