modernponderer Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Hopefully, Windows 7 will not have any drastic changes to the UI and will instead focus on consuming fewer resources, more consistency (see the Battery and Previous Versions icons in Vista), and lots of minor features (tabs in Windows Explorer, DVD Maker improvements, image burning support, built-in antivirus scanning, etc.). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L3thal Veteran Posted January 17, 2008 Veteran Share Posted January 17, 2008 I think with Sinofsky at the helm you might just be surprised. That is the sole reason why I believe this time frame could be met. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goji Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I wonder how drastically the minimum tech specs will change if any by then. Surely nothing worse than what Vista is. :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted January 17, 2008 Veteran Share Posted January 17, 2008 Seems too soon, it's only giving Vista a year or two to mature. Maybe they'll pull it off though, who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Symphony Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Even if those mockups are real... that is just :sleep: . That is just a quicklaunch gadget, nothing more. After this "Vista is just a skinned XP" hype, they have to make something different. And I mean redesign the whole gui, change the whole experience of the OS. There should be .NET 3.5 all over the place, with animations, unusual skins, overlappabble (with per opacity) controls, i can even imagine bundling it with a small LCD panel for a SideShow 2.0 effect. Also the sidebar have to be redesigned: it is too big, way too much space wasted there. If they won't do the "wow" with Vienna, there won't be many Vista->Vienna switcher, not even XP->Vienna switchers. So in summary, i hope they manage to make the change. Under the hood changes are nice, but it won't make their software sell. Remember Vista. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argi Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Seems too soon, it's only giving Vista a year or two to mature.Maybe they'll pull it off though, who knows. Judging by Gates' response in the Gizmodo interview it'd seem pretty clear they want to put Vista behind as quickly as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristian Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Hopefully, Windows 7 will not have any drastic changes to the UI and will instead focus on consuming fewer resources, more consistency (see the Battery and Previous Versions icons in Vista), and lots of minor features (tabs in Windows Explorer, DVD Maker improvements, image burning support, built-in antivirus scanning, etc.). Microsoft will get sued if they include antivirus in Windows 7. There's really a limit to how advanced they can make any bundled app in the OS sadly, because competing software makers will see it as an attempt to destroy their market :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thugilex Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 more money ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamhook Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I eagerly await the 2013 release. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irkalla Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I say no sooner than Q4'10, considering how long it took from XP>Vista, and ontop of that, It's too soon. It's like when apple dropped the prices on the iPhone, it would only serve to annoy me :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linkinfamous Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I say no sooner than Q4'10, considering how long it took from XP>Vista, and ontop of that, It's too soon. It's like when apple dropped the prices on the iPhone, it would only serve to annoy me :p XP-> Vista was the exception, not the rule. And too soon? That'll make 3 years between the Vista and Seven release. That's what it should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CelticWhisper Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Microsoft will get sued if they include antivirus in Windows 7. There's really a limit to how advanced they can make any bundled app in the OS sadly, because competing software makers will see it as an attempt to destroy their market :angry: Then they should bundle as advanced an AV package as they want and then make it very, very easy to uninstall. Users who don't understand the specifics of AV will have protection out-of-the-box, and AV makers will be placated that users who prefer their products can easily remove the Microsoft solution and install McAfee, NOD32, Norton, or whatever else they want (ClamAV for me, thanks). As for when it will be released, it'll be out when it's out. Don't hold your breath, don't plan around it, just do what you have to do in the meantime and when 7 is released, give it some time to be vetted by early adopters and for the kinks to be ironed out. Look at XP and Vista - huge problems/complaints at the get-go, but in short order they became stable and usable with a lot of supporters singing their praises. Patience is a virtue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Mirumir Subscriber¹ Posted January 17, 2008 Subscriber¹ Share Posted January 17, 2008 Look at the down shots, the comments, it's only a prototype. Anyway, even if it was even real, there's no way that's even close to what the end build will look like. I don't need to read the comments to know that Windows 7 is at alpha stage ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt-DavidW Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Here we go again - people! people! it's too early for speculation! Compare what you know about Vienna to 2009 the same as you compare the Windows Longhorn alpha to Vista. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echilon Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 The GUI will more than likely look nothing like the original concepts. XP looked nothing like the early Whistler builds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xazac Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Hey mates. I want to thank anyone for the interest showed. They are just concepts made in Photoshop :D it's just my idea, maybe my dream, about the future UI of Windows Seven. See you soon, bye! :) PS: excuse my bad English, I'm Italian ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randomnut Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 It would make perfect sense for the new version to come that soon, considering what a huge failure Vista has been. Now before the fanboys scream "TROLL!", there is not one business I know of switching to Vista, it would be like suicide. The reasons are too numerous to go into now, but it's just not happening. I work in an IT dept and we have been evaluating Vista and found it simply not fit for purpose. Everyone else I know in a corporate IT environment is waiting until the next version of Vista to do fix what they messed up this time around. It's not trolling, it's the truth. Microsoft needs to get back into the corporate environment, and for that they need a new version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdrock Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Here we go again - people! people! it's too early for speculation!Compare what you know about Vienna to 2009 the same as you compare the Windows Longhorn alpha to Vista. Brings back memories lol good old days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 there was only a year between WinME and WinXP, but you have to consider that work on XP started after Win2k was released and not when ME was released Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I am Reid Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 there was only a year between WinME and WinXP, but you have to consider that work on XP started after Win2k was released and not when ME was released Windows me was only released 7 months after win2k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wst50 Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Windows me was only released 7 months after win2k. Yeah, but that is generally considered a failure, as this shows... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oceanmotion Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I think it would be ok if Microsoft updated that early as long as they start to price the OS at a reasonable price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt-DavidW Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 Yeah, but that is generally considered a failure, as this shows... Haha, that's hilarious! :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
primexx Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 if they charge another arm and a leg for it then it'll be a failure no matter how good it is. They should at the very least provide a cheap upgrade option for Vista owners if they're going to release it that soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trek Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 I want an overhaul of all legacy components: remove native support (registry, crazy dlls, etc.) for previous generation apps but allow them to be run using virtualization. That way, it'll be easier to build a componentized (sp?) OS and write programs which function correctly with non-adminstrative rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts