Recommended Posts

I agree with dual booting but not on the same drive. 2 separate drives is the best way since Windows 7 modifies things in the Vista install. When installing on a lone drive with no other partitions, 7 creates a separate 200MB partition for boot files, ect.

What? it doesn't modify my vista install lol. ROFL. It just creates another option in the boot selection menu for 7. :)

What? it doesn't modify my vista install lol. ROFL. It just creates another option in the boot selection menu for 7. :)

Then why does it make a 200MB partition on a drive with no other partitions? Why does it not do that when a Vista partition is available? I'm not trying to bash 7 or Vista or anything, I was simply pointing out something I noticed when dual-booting.

I agree with dual booting but not on the same drive. 2 separate drives is the best way since Windows 7 modifies things in the Vista install. When installing on a lone drive with no other partitions, 7 creates a separate 200MB partition for boot files, ect.

Hmmm...I have two HDDs, but they're set up in a RAID0 configuration... I suppose I'll just stick Windows 7 on a partition, and when its time to get rid of it, format that partition, set the Vista one as the Active one, and fix the Vista bootloader. I've done it a lot of times already messing with and changing dual-boot configs with Vista/XP or Vista/Vista. ^_^ :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.